Loss of receiv­a­bles is immi­nent! Act befo­re it’s too late. Pled­ges of rights and their rea­liza­ti­on.

Cri­sis types and their sym­ptoms are the ear­ly war­ning sys­tems in receiv­a­bles manage­ment — tho­se who reco­gni­ze them must act imme­dia­te­ly.

Some time ago, a visi­bly angry cre­di­tor cont­ac­ted us. He descri­bed how he had felt — as he put it — cold­ly dis­pos­s­es­sed. Wit­hout war­ning, he was forced to wai­ve a six-figu­re cla­im as part of a so-cal­led Sta­RUG pro­ce­du­re — i.e. a judi­cial res­truc­tu­ring wit­hout insol­ven­cy. The deb­tor in ques­ti­on had hard­ly attrac­ted any nega­ti­ve atten­ti­on before­hand, apart from minor dif­fe­ren­ces in pay­ment terms. Despi­te regu­lar cre­dit checks via a lea­ding cre­dit agen­cy, the blow came as a com­ple­te sur­pri­se.

This exam­p­le shows: Cre­dit agen­ci­es can only work with what they know — and that means the past. Their assess­ments are like loo­king in the rear-view mir­ror — hel­pful for ori­en­ta­ti­on, but unsui­ta­ble for avo­i­ding impen­ding col­li­si­ons.

The cal­ler cont­ac­ted us after wat­ching our video “Freight for­war­der’s lien — pre­ven­ting the cri­sis from beco­ming a dis­as­ter”, which we have lin­ked below. He was par­ti­cu­lar­ly inte­res­ted in our recom­men­da­ti­on to be proac­ti­ve and proac­ti­ve at the first signs of impen­ding pay­ment defaults. He asked for advice on how to bet­ter mana­ge simi­lar risks in the future.

This is an important topic that will beco­me incre­asing­ly important in the coming years. An asto­nis­hing num­ber of com­pa­nies have not yet reco­gni­zed the serious­ness of the impen­ding situa­ti­on and are still in “fair wea­ther mode”. If you want to avo­id fin­ding yours­elf in the smo­king ruins of an insol­vent com­pa­ny, you as an entre­pre­neur should urgen­tly and imme­dia­te­ly prepa­re for the impen­ding tur­bu­lence.

Sin­ce we now know that we can no lon­ger pre­vent pay­ment defaults using con­ven­tio­nal methods, it is neces­sa­ry to use new instru­ments to pre­vent pay­ment defaults.

But how can impen­ding pay­ment defaults be reco­gni­zed in prac­ti­ce?

The dete­rio­ra­ti­on of a com­pany’s sol­ven­cy can be pre­cis­e­ly defi­ned using busi­ness manage­ment methods. We app­ly the IDW S 6 stan­dards of the Insti­tu­te of Public Audi­tors in Ger­ma­ny.

Let’s look at the inter­nal cau­ses of cri­ses among deb­tors. Even if legis­la­tors and affec­ted deb­tors repea­ted­ly try to invol­ve cre­di­tors in their pro­blems, it is not the task of cre­di­tors to cor­rect the fai­lings of their deb­tors. The­r­e­fo­re, it is not expe­di­ent to deal with the cau­ses of the cri­sis on the deb­tors’ side at this point. To put it blunt­ly: cre­di­tors should not put on this shoe, as they are not respon­si­ble for the plight of their deb­tors. For the cre­di­tor, the cau­ses of the cri­sis are less rele­vant with regard to his cre­dit decis­i­on; what is more important are the indi­ca­tors that can be deri­ved from them. Accor­ding to cur­rent busi­ness manage­ment theo­ry in rela­ti­on to receiv­a­bles manage­ment, a distinc­tion is made bet­ween ele­ven cau­ses of cri­ses and their sym­ptoms.

First­ly, cri­ses that are roo­ted in com­pa­ny manage­ment.
Typi­cal sym­ptoms of a cri­sis are:
Dis­pu­tes at share­hol­der level
Dif­fe­ren­ces of opi­ni­on within the com­pa­ny that lead to open and hid­den con­flicts
Unclear com­pa­ny and per­son­nel manage­ment.

Second­ly, cri­ses that are roo­ted in the orga­niza­ti­on.
The cri­sis sym­ptoms here are:
Com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on and trans­pa­ren­cy defi­ci­ts
Incre­asing workload in admi­nis­tra­ti­on and manage­ment
Time delays due to incre­asing orga­niza­tio­nal and admi­nis­tra­ti­ve effort

Third­ly: Cri­ses in plan­ning and con­trol­ling.
The sym­ptoms of a cri­sis are:
Delay­ed pro­vi­si­on of data for cost accoun­ting and target/actual com­pa­ri­sons
Lack of com­pre­hen­si­ble cost cal­cu­la­ti­ons for pro­duct or ser­vice vari­ants
Sup­p­ly pro­blems due to ina­de­qua­te inven­to­ry manage­ment.

Fourth: Cri­ses in sales.
The sym­ptoms include:
Decli­ne in inco­ming orders and loss of mar­ket share
Cus­to­mers secu­re new busi­ness rela­ti­onships
Cus­to­mers demand grea­ter pri­ce con­ces­si­ons becau­se they have the impres­si­on that the sup­pli­er is weak and com­pli­ant
Increase in recalls and com­plaints
Lack of inco­ming orders, later the trans­fer of alre­a­dy pla­ced orders to other sup­pli­ers
Decli­ne in requests for quo­ta­ti­ons.

Fifth­ly: cri­ses in purcha­sing.
The sym­ptoms of the cri­sis are:
Sup­pli­ers are reluc­tant to deli­ver or only deli­ver against advan­ce pay­ment
Remin­ders are beco­ming more fre­quent, dun­ning is gene­ral­ly fas­ter
Pay­ment terms are being redu­ced, sup­pli­ers’ cre­dit lines are being cut

Trade cre­dit insu­r­ers can­cel or redu­ce their cre­dit limits.

Sixth: Cri­ses in the pro­duc­tion sec­tor.
The sym­ptoms of a cri­sis are:
Unde­r­uti­liza­ti­on of machi­nery and equip­ment
Rising invent­ories
Deli­very pro­blems
Non-com­pli­ance with qua­li­ty stan­dards and deli­very dead­lines.

Seventh: HR cri­ses.
The cri­sis sym­ptoms include:
Good, qua­li­fied employees lea­ve; the fluc­tua­ti­on rate increa­ses
Increase in absen­te­eism (e.g. due to sick lea­ve)
High time and men­tal bur­den on manage­ment
Staff sur­plu­s­es, but usual­ly only in the pro­duc­ti­ve area
Good appli­cants lea­ve or can only be recrui­ted with exces­si­ve sala­ry pro­mi­ses.

Eighth: Cri­ses in the invest­ment area.
Sym­ptoms of a cri­sis are:
Imple­men­ta­ti­on of une­co­no­mic­al invest­ments
Invest­ments are not finan­ced with matching matu­ri­ties
Invest­ment back­log, which leads to an incre­asing sus­cep­ti­bi­li­ty to dis­rup­ti­ons in the pro­cess chain.

Ninth: Cri­ses in rese­arch and deve­lo­p­ment
The sym­ptoms of a cri­sis are:
Lack of or insuf­fi­ci­ent inno­va­ti­ve strength
Pro­ducts and ser­vices that do not meet cus­to­mer needs
Decli­ning com­pe­ti­ti­ve­ness due to out­da­ted pro­ducts.

Tenth: Cri­ses in finan­cing
The sym­ptoms of a cri­sis are:
Banks demand real or per­so­nal col­la­te­ral
Chan­ge of bank advi­sor (sup­port is pro­vi­ded by the Spe­cial Cre­dit Manage­ment or Inten­si­ve Care depart­ment)
Cre­dit lines are fro­zen, redu­ced or cal­led in.

Ele­venth: Cri­ses in pay­ment beha­vi­or
The sym­ptoms of a cri­sis are:
Slug­gish pay­ment beha­vi­or; pay­ment tar­gets are regu­lar­ly excee­ded
Delays in pay­ment due to dis­pu­tes about the legi­ti­ma­cy of receiv­a­bles based on alle­ged com­plaints or sup­po­sed for­mal errors in invoi­cing.

If cre­di­tors noti­ce seve­ral of the­se sym­ptoms of cri­sis in their deb­tors, it is time to demand addi­tio­nal col­la­te­ral.

You can find out more about this in our video “Buil­ding a fire­wall to secu­re receiv­a­bles”, which is lin­ked below. Or it makes sen­se to end a busi­ness rela­ti­onship. The tried-and-tes­ted com­mer­cial insight that the best deals are some­ti­mes the ones you don’t make appli­es.

Plea­se cont­act us if you have a spe­ci­fic case for a public auc­tion: To the cont­act form

We have pro­vi­ded an expl­ana­to­ry video to pro­vi­de infor­ma­ti­on about the assign­ment: To the expl­ana­to­ry video for cli­ents

Infor­ma­ti­on on the auc­tion pro­cess: To the expl­ana­to­ry video for bidders

More vide­os on the topic:

Freight for­war­ding lien law: So that the cri­sis does not beco­me a dis­as­ter for logi­stics com­pa­nies.

Build a fire­wall to secu­re receiv­a­bles!

Opti­ons for hedging receiv­a­bles — plan­ning secu­ri­ty in advan­ce

Lite­ra­tu­re: Cro­ne, Andre­as / Hen­ning, Wer­ner (ed.), Moder­nes Sanie­rungs­ma­nage­ment, Munich: 2021

Pho­to col­la­ge using pho­tos from enva­to ele­ments: Pho­to­grapher bil­a­nol Licen­se code V23B5PWUHQ + Pho­to­grapher RLT­heis Licen­se code FN7PHQYUM3

Share post:

Facebook
X
LinkedIn

Further contributions: