Sta­RUG meets Pledge Law: Whe­re Res­truc­tu­ring Ends and the Right of Enforce­ment Beg­ins

Why Ful­ly Pled­ged GmbH Shares Set Legal Limits to Sta­RUG – a Res­truc­tu­ring and Reor­ga­niza­ti­on Frame­work

Sta­RUG is a powerful instru­ment for out-of-court res­truc­tu­ring. Its limits, howe­ver, beco­me appa­rent whe­re ful­ly pled­ged shares in a Ger­man limi­t­ed lia­bi­li­ty com­pa­ny (GmbH) are invol­ved. In such con­stel­la­ti­ons, eco­no­mic and legal con­trol over the shares no lon­ger lies with the deb­tor, but with the pled­gee. Any attempt by Sta­RUG to inter­fe­re with the pledgee’s right of enforce­ment encoun­ters clear dog­ma­tic, con­sti­tu­tio­nal, and lia­bi­li­ty-rela­ted boun­da­ries.

In prac­ti­ce, the Cor­po­ra­te Sta­bi­liza­ti­on and Res­truc­tu­ring Act (Sta­RUG) has estab­lished its­elf as a fle­xi­ble tool to address immi­nent insol­ven­cy out­side for­mal insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings. Its scope of appli­ca­ti­on is nevert­hel­ess often ove­re­sti­ma­ted. This beco­mes par­ti­cu­lar­ly evi­dent in res­truc­tu­rings of com­pa­nies who­se shares are con­trac­tual­ly pled­ged in their enti­re­ty. In the­se cases, the debtor’s res­truc­tu­ring inte­rest direct­ly col­l­i­des with the pledgee’s in rem secu­red legal posi­ti­on.

The start­ing point of any legal ana­ly­sis is the natu­re of the col­la­te­ral. GmbH shares are rights, not tan­gi­ble assets. Their enforce­ment is gover­ned by a distinct legal regime under §§ 1228 et seq. of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB) in con­junc­tion with § 15 of the GmbH Act (GmbHG). The Fede­ral Court of Jus­ti­ce (Bun­des­ge­richts­hof) has cla­ri­fied that the insol­ven­cy-law power of rea­liza­ti­on under § 166(1) of the Insol­ven­cy Code (InsO) does not app­ly to rights. This assess­ment extends sys­te­mi­cal­ly into the Sta­RUG frame­work. Whe­re even in ope­ned insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings no power of rea­liza­ti­on exists for the admi­nis­tra­tor, such power can­not a for­tio­ri be fic­tion­a­li­zed in a pre-insol­ven­cy res­truc­tu­ring pro­cee­ding.

The Posi­ti­on of the Pled­gee in the Case of Full Col­la­te­ra­liza­ti­on

If a GmbH share is ful­ly pled­ged, its eco­no­mic value is allo­ca­ted to the pled­gee. The debtor’s sta­tus as share­hol­der under cor­po­ra­te law is, in this situa­ti­on, lar­ge­ly hol­lo­wed out. The share no lon­ger func­tions as res­truc­tu­ring sub­s­tance, but as col­la­te­ral. Res­truc­tu­ring mea­su­res that tar­get such a share the­r­e­fo­re risk not achie­ving a res­truc­tu­ring, but mere­ly tem­po­r­a­ri­ly blo­cking third-par­ty assets.

While Sta­RUG does pro­vi­de for sta­bi­liza­ti­on orders that may tem­po­r­a­ri­ly pro­hi­bit enforce­ment and rea­liza­ti­on mea­su­res, such inter­ven­ti­ons are sub­ject to strict requi­re­ments. They must be pro­por­tio­na­te and must not result in an imper­mis­si­ble impair­ment of col­la­te­ral. In cases of one-hundred-per­cent pled­ging, the­re is typi­cal­ly no over­ri­ding res­truc­tu­ring inte­rest capa­ble of jus­ti­fy­ing such inter­fe­rence. The res­truc­tu­ring would not be car­ri­ed out on the basis of the debtor’s own eco­no­mic sub­s­tance, but at the expen­se of the secu­red cre­di­tor.

Limits of Plan Effects in Res­truc­tu­ring Pro­cee­dings

Auch der Restruk­tu­rie­rungs­plan bie­tet kei­ne Mög­lich­keit, die­se struk­tu­rel­le Schief­la­ge zu über­brü­cken. Die Ein­be­zie­hung eines voll­stän­dig besi­cher­ten Pfand­gläu­bi­gers in einen Plan setzt vor­aus, dass des­sen Rechts­po­si­ti­on gewahrt bleibt. Das Prin­zip, dass kein Gläu­bi­ger durch den Plan schlech­ter gestellt wer­den darf als ohne ihn, gewinnt hier beson­de­re Bedeu­tung. Wird der Pfand­gläu­bi­ger an der Ver­wer­tung gehin­dert oder auf eine zeit­lich gestreck­te Quo­te ver­wie­sen, obwohl ihm die sofor­ti­ge Pfand­ver­wer­tung offen­steht, liegt regel­mä­ßig eine Schlech­ter­stel­lung vor.

In addi­ti­on, com­pa­ny valua­tions in the Sta­RUG con­text are often based on going-con­cern assump­ti­ons. The­se assump­ti­ons lose their foun­da­ti­on whe­re the shares are no lon­ger eco­no­mic­al­ly attri­bu­ta­ble to the deb­tor. Wit­hout con­trol over the shares, the cen­tral basis for a via­ble going-con­cern pro­gno­sis is lack­ing.

Public Auc­tion as the Legal End Point

Sta­tu­to­ry pledge enforce­ment desi­gna­tes public auc­tion under § 1235 BGB as the stan­dard method. The knock­down con­sti­tu­tes a rights-crea­ting sove­reign act that defi­ni­tively deter­mi­nes value and con­cludes the rea­liza­ti­on pro­cess. It is pre­cis­e­ly this fina­li­ty that stands in ten­si­on with res­truc­tu­ring-law delay mecha­nisms. Whe­re the legis­la­tu­re has предусмотрено a clear end­ga­me situa­ti­on, Sta­RUG must not crea­te a per­ma­nent pro­vi­sio­nal sta­te.

Attempts to post­po­ne the public auc­tion of ful­ly pled­ged GmbH shares through res­truc­tu­ring mea­su­res the­r­e­fo­re amount, in sub­s­tance, to a de fac­to expro­pria­ti­on. They shift insol­ven­cy risk uni­la­te­ral­ly onto the pled­gee and under­mi­ne the sys­te­ma­tic cohe­rence of secu­ri­ty law.

Prac­ti­cal Con­clu­si­on

Sta­RUG is not a uni­ver­sal reme­dy. In the case of ful­ly pled­ged GmbH shares, its reach ends whe­re the pledgee’s right of enforce­ment beg­ins. Res­truc­tu­ring must not dege­ne­ra­te into a mere delay of lawful pledge rea­liza­ti­on. For cre­di­tors, this means taking a clear posi­ti­on at an ear­ly stage and con­sis­t­ent­ly chal­len­ging imper­mis­si­ble inter­ven­ti­ons. For deb­tors and advi­sers, it con­ver­se­ly means that res­truc­tu­ring con­cepts must remain rea­li­stic. Whe­re no inde­pen­dent eco­no­mic sub­s­tance remains, Sta­RUG does not replace realization—it mere­ly post­po­nes it, at the cost of signi­fi­cant legal and lia­bi­li­ty risks.

If you, as a cre­di­tor, want to sell your pro­per­ty secu­re­ly and in com­pli­ance with the law, make sure that a public bid is accept­ed by an auc­tion­eer — whe­ther in per­son or live online.

Fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on on col­la­te­ral enforce­ment — prac­ti­cal, stra­te­gic and legal­ly com­pli­ant — can be found on our web­site:
www.deutsche-pfandverwertung.de

We are publicly appoin­ted and sworn auc­tion­eers with many years of expe­ri­ence in the field of col­la­te­ral enforce­ment.

Cont­act us — tog­e­ther for a suc­cessful result!

Fur­ther artic­les on the topic

M&A‑Abbruch bei Insol­venz­er­öff­nung: zwin­gend bei Abson­de­run­gen ver­pfän­de­ter Unter­neh­mens­an­tei­le und IP-Rech­­ten

Ver­wer­tung von ver­pfän­de­ten Unter­neh­mens­an­tei­len oder Rech­ten im Insol­venz­fall

Son­der­rech­te des Gläu­bi­gers bei Insol­venz des Schuld­ners

Pfand­rech­te an Geschäfts­an­tei­len: opti­mier­tes Ver­wer­tungs­in­stru­ment in der For­de­rungs­rea­li­sie­rung durch Anteils­ver­kauf

Pledge of rights — ever­y­thing you need to know explai­ned. A pledge of rights can rela­te to things, i.e. phy­si­cal objects, as well as to rights of any kind, such as com­pa­ny shares, patents, secu­ri­ties, IP rights, domains, licen­ses or trade­mark rights.

Public Auc­tion Pledge of rights Com­pa­ny shares, busi­ness shares, rights of all kinds (IP rights, domains) and their rea­liza­ti­on in pledge auc­tions Auc­tions as online auc­tions Online auc­tion Online auc­tion Pledge rea­liza­ti­on Public auc­tion by publicly appoin­ted sworn auc­tion­eer Auc­tion­eer

Share post:

Facebook
X
LinkedIn

Further contributions: