“Snail jus­ti­ce”? — Risk for com­pa­nies when rea­li­zing claims in court

The num­ber of over­due pay­ments and insol­ven­ci­es is rising rapidly.

Com­pa­nies are ree­ling. Some entre­pre­neurs think to them­sel­ves: I’ll ins­truct my lawy­er to sue the defaul­ting deb­tors. Howe­ver, this comes at a time when the courts are com­ple­te­ly over­loa­ded.

In its artic­le on 02.08.2024, “Die Welt” wro­te about the defi­ci­ts in the Ger­man jus­ti­ce sys­tem. Ger­ma­ny needs to impro­ve its rule of law, the EU Com­mis­si­on con­cluded in its “Rule of Law Report 2024”, accor­ding to the artic­le in Die Welt. Its legal experts iden­ti­fied short­co­mings in the Ger­man jus­ti­ce sys­tem. As a result, Ger­ma­ny has some home­work to do in the area of the rule of law when it comes to the staf­fing and effi­ci­en­cy of the courts. The “Neue Zür­cher Zei­tung” wro­te in 2023: “The­re is too much paper and too few staff in Ger­many’s courts”. Accor­ding to the news­pa­per, this is incre­asing­ly due to the increase in pro­cee­dings for citi­zens’ bene­fits at the social court, the wave of asyl­um claims and rising crime. As a result, the­re is less and less capa­ci­ty for the court pro­cee­dings that com­pa­nies are brin­ging in dun­ning and legal pro­cee­dings.

What is important for you as an entre­pre­neur is that Ger­ma­ny must — despi­te pro­gress in the past year — signi­fi­cant­ly increase the num­ber of jud­ges and public pro­se­cu­tors in order to achie­ve Euro­pean stan­dards. As the news­pa­per “Die Welt” notes, the­re is one point in par­ti­cu­lar that citi­zens in Ger­ma­ny also find incre­asing­ly annoy­ing: Many court cases do not take place at all or take place much later, often years later. Or court pro­cee­dings drag on fore­ver becau­se the­re are too few jud­ges and public pro­se­cu­tors.

Espe­ci­al­ly in times of high infla­ti­on, prompt judgment and reco­very of out­stan­ding claims can be of exis­ten­ti­al importance for entre­pre­neurs.

As a rule, non-per­forming con­tracts have com­mer­cial cau­ses. It is in the natu­re of things that the best way to find a prompt and fair solu­ti­on to a pro­blem bet­ween busi­ness peo­p­le is through com­mer­cial chan­nels.

We do not have a poli­ti­cal blog and the­r­e­fo­re do not com­ment on the poli­ti­cal cir­cum­s­tances that have led to this mise­ry. We use our many years of exper­ti­se to pro­vi­de prac­ti­cal advice on how to save your own com­pa­ny in tur­bu­lent times.

What many peo­p­le don’t know or no lon­ger have on their radar: The­re is a simp­le ans­wer to the pro­blem. In order to obtain a legal hea­ring, the arbi­tra­ti­on pro­ce­du­re of the Cham­ber of Indus­try and Com­mer­ce can be used as an alter­na­ti­ve to con­ven­tio­nal legal pro­cee­dings. A final, legal­ly bin­ding decis­i­on can usual­ly be rea­ched much more quick­ly in this way than through the con­ven­tio­nal dun­ning and legal pro­cee­dings in court. Inter­na­tio­nal­ly acti­ve com­pa­nies very often use this opti­on. Entre­pre­neurs can obtain infor­ma­ti­on and per­so­nal advice via the IHK web­site. This is the right of IHK mem­bers. They also bene­fit from the cham­ber fees they have paid over the years. Medi­um-sized com­pa­nies can also make the invol­vement of an IHK arbi­tra­ti­on tri­bu­nal a con­di­ti­on. It sim­ply has to be included as a con­di­ti­on of the legal sta­tus in the agree­ment on the place of juris­dic­tion. The legis­la­tor con­ti­nues to pro­vi­de for this pos­si­bi­li­ty of dis­pu­te reso­lu­ti­on. This reli­e­ves the bur­den on the courts. We are incre­asing­ly fin­ding that our cli­ents hand­le it this way

But the­re is ano­ther effec­ti­ve and effi­ci­ent way.

The prompt and con­sider­a­b­ly more cost-effec­ti­ve rea­liza­ti­on of receiv­a­bles can be imple­men­ted at short noti­ce and out of court via con­trac­tu­al or sta­tu­to­ry pled­ges of rights.

Taking a pledge is the com­mer­cial solu­ti­on ins­tead of the very leng­thy enforce­ment pro­ce­du­re via the bai­liff, who works in accordance with the Code of Civil Pro­ce­du­re and the bai­liff enforce­ment regu­la­ti­ons.

The law also pro­vi­des for valuable assets to be depo­si­ted with an inde­pen­dent cus­to­di­an. In the event of default, the assets can then be liqui­da­ted at short noti­ce. In any sub­se­quent insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings, the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor then has no access to the pled­ged items. In our capa­ci­ty as publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eers, we are sworn to our inde­pen­dence in the pro­cee­dings. As a neu­tral aut­ho­ri­ty, we also offer safe­kee­ping ser­vices.

Entre­pre­neurs are thus regai­ning some of their com­mer­cial free­dom.

Plea­se cont­act us if you have a spe­ci­fic case for a public auc­tion: To the cont­act form

We have pro­vi­ded an expl­ana­to­ry video to pro­vi­de infor­ma­ti­on about the assign­ment: To the expl­ana­to­ry video for cli­ents

Infor­ma­ti­on on the auc­tion pro­cess: To the expl­ana­to­ry video for bidders

More vide­os on the topic:

Build a fire­wall to secu­re receiv­a­bles!

Opti­ons for hedging receiv­a­bles — plan­ning secu­ri­ty in advan­ce

Pho­to col­la­ges using pho­tos from enva­tor ele­ments: pho­to­grapher Rex­ca­n­or licen­se 86HY97KT3Z, pho­to­grapher ves­vo­crea licen­se TZP4U7HR93, Light­Field­Stu­di­os licen­se W3PQX2BCVR, pho­to­grapher jir­kae­jc licen­se WY6CQMSEB4.

Share post:

Facebook
X
LinkedIn

Further contributions: