When Market Practice Misreads Legal Frameworks and Process Integrity: Why the Public Auction Remains Undervalued
In the enforcement of equity interests in German companies, the market often assesses public auction by reference to misplaced benchmarks. In distressed and special situations, however, it continues to prove a tested, efficient and comparatively low-liability mechanism for definitive realization—both in domestic German cases and in cross-border structures.
Persistent Market Prejudices
Certain market characterizations have proved particularly persistent: public auction is often regarded as slow, bureaucratic, operationally burdensome and economically inferior. That view falls short. It fails to reflect both the governing legal framework and the actual procedural reality.
What is notable, however, is that these prejudices do not stem from unfamiliarity alone. They are frequently repeated without being subjected to independent scrutiny. In practice, moreover, they are often reinforced by prevailing market conventions and embedded deal logic.
Institutionally Anchored Process Preferences
In restructuring and special situations, there is often a structural affinity for bilateral M&A processes. These offer greater scope for individualized process control, selective buyer outreach and transaction design shaped through close negotiation.
That is precisely why they are often preferred in practice. The preference is understandable. It also means, however, that alternative procedures with a clear legal architecture—such as public auction—are not assessed on a neutral basis, but instead measured against standards derived from a different process logic.
The result is a distortion: a process designed to ensure market exposure, objective price formation and a final award is assessed by reference to criteria centered on negotiating flexibility and procedural control.
Legal Framework and Procedural Reality
Public auction under the German Civil Code is neither a subset of compulsory enforcement nor a simplified M&A process. It is a distinct, statutorily structured realization mechanism.
Its strength lies in the combination of:
- open-market price formation,
- clear legal positions and defined rules,
- a process supported by robust documentation,
- a final award, and
- valuation findings capable of withstanding judicial scrutiny.
It is precisely this structure that makes the process not only legally robust, but also practically efficient.
Effectiveness in Distressed Enforcement
In distressed and special situations, the decisive consideration is not maximum negotiating flexibility, but execution certainty. Public auction is designed to produce completion. It delivers a final, legally conclusive outcome—typically within a matter of weeks.
In doing so, public auction reduces a number of core risk factors:
- timing delays, and value erosion,
- renegotiation risk,
- re-trading risk,
- ex post challenge risk.
Gerade bei obstruktiven Schuldnerkonstellationen oder komplexen Intercreditor-Strukturen zeigt sich dieser Vorteil besonders deutlich.
This advantage is particularly evident in obstructive debtor scenarios and in complex intercreditor structures.Preisbildung und Haftungsprofil
Public auction generates market price through competition. It does not merely assert it. That gives rise to a decisive advantage: the resulting valuation is grounded in an objective process, fully documented and capable of withstanding judicial scrutiny.
By contrast, bilaterally managed private sale processes are generally more vulnerable to challenge. The more selective the buyer access, the distribution of information and the price formation process, the greater the risk of subsequent disputes—particularly where allegations of undervalue arise or the transaction takes place in a near-insolvency context.
Public auction structurally mitigates those concerns and, for that reason, generally presents a lower liability profile.
Relevance in Domestic and Cross-Border Structures
This is particularly significant in cross-border settings. Where London-based lenders, international funds or intercreditor structures are dealing with German-law collateral, the decisive consideration is not familiarity with Anglo-American process norms, but actual enforceability under German law.
In this context, public auction provides a clear and legally ordered transition from the security position to definitive realization. It reduces execution risk and creates a robust basis for decision-making.
The fact that these issues are now being addressed in the institutional credit market is reflected in the specialist press, particularly in private debt publications.
Conclusion
Public auction is neither an exceptional remedy nor a relic. It is a proven, efficient and comparatively low-liability mechanism for the structured resolution of complex security positions.
The fact that it is nevertheless still frequently underestimated does not stem from lack of familiarity alone. More importantly, the market has developed procedural preferences that continue to shape how it is assessed.
That is precisely why a precise analytical framework is required: not one based on familiar market routines, but one grounded in the governing legal framework and the actual quality of the process.
Contact us — together for a successful result!
Further articles on the topic
M&A‑Abbruch bei Insolvenzeröffnung: zwingend bei Absonderungen verpfändeter Unternehmensanteile und IP-Rechten
Verwertung von verpfändeten Unternehmensanteilen oder Rechten im Insolvenzfall
Sonderrechte des Gläubigers bei Insolvenz des Schuldners
Pfandrechte an Geschäftsanteilen: optimiertes Verwertungsinstrument in der Forderungsrealisierung durch Anteilsverkauf
Pledge of rights — everything you need to know explained. A pledge of rights can relate to things, i.e. physical objects, as well as to rights of any kind, such as company shares, patents, securities, IP rights, domains, licenses or trademark rights.
