Rea­liza­ti­on of com­pa­ny shares — Sale of shares: Public auc­tion of New­Co shares

Sale of shares: public auc­tion of com­pa­ny shares as a legal­ly com­pli­ant end­ga­me pro­ce­du­re for col­la­te­ral enforce­ment: speed, fina­li­ty and eco­no­mic effi­ci­en­cy

Deal Cer­tain­ty — Pri­ce Dis­co­very — Time-to-Clo­se

Insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tors are regu­lar­ly faced with the decis­i­on of how best to rea­li­ze shares — for exam­p­le in a New­Co as part of a res­truc­tu­ring. Tra­di­tio­nal­ly, this is often done through a pri­va­te sale, in cer­tain cases also through a struc­tu­red M&A pro­cess. Howe­ver, both methods have limi­ta­ti­ons: Sel­ling by pri­va­te trea­ty cau­ses con­sidera­ble work and lia­bi­li­ty risks, while a full-sca­le M&A set-up is regu­lar­ly dis­pro­por­tio­na­te for smal­ler pro­cee­dings.

The public auc­tion offers an inde­pen­dent and incre­asing­ly prac­ti­cal alter­na­ti­ve here: a legal­ly com­pli­ant, trans­pa­rent, fast and extre­me­ly cost-effec­ti­ve pro­ce­du­re that is par­ti­cu­lar­ly useful for smal­ler and con­flict-pro­ne pro­cee­dings.

The pri­va­te sale — free­dom of design with lia­bi­li­ty risk

The pri­va­te sale initi­al­ly appears attrac­ti­ve becau­se the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor reta­ins full con­trol and no exter­nal cos­ts are incur­red. In prac­ti­ce, howe­ver, it invol­ves con­sidera­ble effort: Inte­res­ted par­ties must be iden­ti­fied and approa­ched, expo­sés pre­pared, infor­ma­ti­on pro­vi­ded, offers com­pared and final­ly nego­tia­ti­ons con­duc­ted. Each of the­se steps is open to attack — espe­ci­al­ly if cre­di­tors later cla­im that hig­her pro­ceeds could have been achie­ved.
Alle­ga­ti­ons of underva­lua­ti­on are the­r­e­fo­re a con­stant com­pa­n­ion. Ren­ego­tia­ti­ons delay the con­clu­si­on and increase the risk of claims being made against the admi­nis­tra­tor ex post in accordance with sec­tion 60 InsO. Added to this is the per­so­nal bur­den: the admi­nis­tra­tor bears the main bur­den of mar­ke­ting and has to jus­ti­fy hims­elf in case of doubt.

M&A — the usu­al way, but not always pro­por­tio­na­te

A struc­tu­red M&A pro­cess can make sen­se for sub­stan­ti­al tar­gets with broad stra­te­gic inte­rest. Alt­hough the M&A tran­sac­tion enables the inter­na­tio­nal search for inves­tors within an open time­frame, it requi­res com­pre­hen­si­ve, com­plex and resour­ce-inten­si­ve pre­pa­ra­ti­on. At the same time, the­se pro­ces­ses are time-con­sum­ing and cost-inten­si­ve: retai­ners, suc­cess fees, data rooms and long due dili­gence pha­ses are a bur­den on the mas­ses and often drag out the pro­cess for months. High sepa­ra­te cos­ts are incur­red for the vir­tu­al data room (VDR) and the con­tract alo­ne, which — depen­ding on the dura­ti­on and volu­me — can be in the mid five-figu­re ran­ge. Both the VDR and the con­tract are ful­ly included in the Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tung pro­cess. Legal­ly com­pli­ant recy­cling is the­r­e­fo­re mana­geable in terms of time, trans­pa­rent and cal­culable wit­hout addi­tio­nal cos­ts right from the start.

Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tun­g’s public auc­tions pro­vi­de access to inter­na­tio­nal inves­tors in the same way as M&A — but in a lean, cle­ar­ly struc­tu­red and legal­ly com­pli­ant pro­ce­du­re within a short peri­od of time with final accep­tance of the bid wit­hout ren­ego­tia­ti­on.

For smal­ler and medi­um-sized com­pa­nies in par­ti­cu­lar, a com­pre­hen­si­ve M&A set­up is the­r­e­fo­re usual­ly not pro­por­tio­na­te. This crea­tes a con­flict bet­ween effort, cos­ts and the goal of quick­ly achie­ving a relia­ble result for the cre­di­tors.

The public auc­tion as an opti­on — legal­ly com­pli­ant, fast, open to the mar­ket and value-opti­mi­zing

The public auc­tion crea­tes an effec­ti­ve balan­ce here. It reli­e­ves the admi­nis­tra­tor becau­se the pro­cess is stan­dar­di­zed, trans­pa­rent and legal­ly com­pli­ant. The accep­tance of the bid in accordance with sec­tion 156 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB) repres­ents the legal­ly final end point: The con­tract comes into effect when the bid is accept­ed; ren­ego­tia­ti­ons are excluded.

The com­ple­te docu­men­ta­ti­on, the public announce­ment (§ 1237 BGB) and the open bidder approach crea­te tracea­bi­li­ty. Alle­ga­ti­ons of underva­lua­ti­on are regu­lar­ly rejec­ted by courts, as the auc­tion is con­side­red an open mar­ket and legal­ly per­mis­si­ble method of rea­liza­ti­on (see BGH, judgment of 11.05.2006 — IX ZR 247/03, ZIP 2006, 1209; Uhlen­bruck, InsO, § 159 mar­gi­nal num­ber 17 ff.).

In addi­ti­on, Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tung con­tri­bu­tes spe­ci­fic mar­ke­ting know-how and spe­cial exper­ti­se in gene­ra­ting buy­ers: from approa­ching sui­ta­ble groups of inves­tors to the tar­ge­ted posi­tio­ning of the assets on the mar­ket. In addi­ti­on, tax struc­tu­ring opti­ons can also be taken into account as part of the tran­sac­tion struc­tu­re so that an eco­no­mic­al­ly opti­mi­zed result can be achie­ved. An addi­tio­nal advan­ta­ge: the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor bene­fits indi­rect­ly via his remu­ne­ra­ti­on sys­tem in accordance with the Insol­ven­cy Remu­ne­ra­ti­on Ordi­nan­ce (InsVV, Sec­tions 1 et seq., in par­ti­cu­lar Sec­tions 2 and 3) if hig­her pro­ceeds result in a lar­ger dis­tri­bu­ti­on frame­work.

The time aspect is cru­cial: in prac­ti­ce, an auc­tion pro­ce­du­re can usual­ly be car­ri­ed out in a legal­ly com­pli­ant man­ner within just four to six weeks. This short dura­ti­on pre­vents pro­gres­si­ve loss of value, redu­ces ope­ra­tio­nal risks in the com­pa­ny and pro­vi­des a clear, final con­clu­si­on. This ensu­res both legal cer­tain­ty and eco­no­mic value reten­ti­on. The cost struc­tu­re is trans­pa­rent and regu­lar­ly neu­tral for the admi­nis­tra­tor, except for inter­nal pro­ces­sing cos­ts, as the pre­mi­um is bor­ne by the purcha­ser.

Advan­ta­ges for insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tors and inves­tors

The public auc­tion is not only legal­ly con­vin­cing, but also prac­ti­cal:

  • It expands the cir­cle of poten­ti­al buy­ers through digi­tal reach.
  • It makes the pri­cing pro­cess trans­pa­rent and com­pre­hen­si­ble.
  • It pre­vents accu­sa­ti­ons of favo­ri­tism towards indi­vi­du­al inves­tors.
  • It pro­vi­des the admi­nis­tra­tor with a legal­ly docu­men­ted basis for decis­i­on-making.
  • It mini­mi­zes the risk of loss of value due to the short dura­ti­on.

Espe­ci­al­ly in con­flict-pro­ne cre­di­tor con­stel­la­ti­ons, this approach pro­ves to be an effec­ti­ve way of avo­i­ding later dis­pu­tes. It crea­tes accep­tance for insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tors and a clear pro­ce­du­re with fixed dead­lines for inves­tors. Howe­ver, public auc­tions are not only appro­pria­te in such con­flict situa­tions: Espe­ci­al­ly in smal­ler or medi­um-sized pro­cee­dings, it offers an advan­ta­ge­ous alter­na­ti­ve due to lower tran­sac­tion cos­ts and the fina­li­ty of the award pro­vi­ded for by law (sec­tion 156 et seq. BGB, sec­tion 445 BGB).

Con­clu­si­on for prac­ti­ce

The public auc­tion is far more than just a fall­back opti­on. It is an inde­pen­dent explo­ita­ti­on method reco­gni­zed by case law and lite­ra­tu­re that com­bi­nes legal con­for­mi­ty, trans­pa­ren­cy, effi­ci­en­cy and speed.

This means for insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tors:

  • Lia­bi­li­ty avo­id­ance: You signi­fi­cant­ly redu­ce your per­so­nal lia­bi­li­ty in accordance with Sec­tion 60 InsO, as accu­sa­ti­ons of underva­lua­ti­on are prac­ti­cal­ly excluded.
  • Speed and value pro­tec­tion: you end the pro­cess within 4–6 weeks, pre­vent loss of value and crea­te cla­ri­ty.
  • Remu­ne­ra­ti­on advan­ta­ge: Hig­her reve­nues increase the dis­tri­bu­ti­on frame­work and at the same time increase your remu­ne­ra­ti­on in accordance with InsVV.
  • Effi­ci­en­cy: You save time and resour­ces becau­se the pro­cess is struc­tu­red and stan­dar­di­zed.

The bot­tom line is this: While M&A remains sen­si­ble for sub­stan­ti­al tar­gets with inter­na­tio­nal inves­tor inte­rest, a pri­va­te sale by the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor is hard­ly effi­ci­ent on clo­ser con­side­ra­ti­on and rare­ly opti­mi­zes pro­ceeds. The public auc­tion is the more expe­di­ent solu­ti­on, espe­ci­al­ly for smal­ler and con­flict-pro­ne pro­cee­dings: fas­ter, less cos­t­ly and legal­ly final. Tho­se who con­scious­ly inte­gra­te it into their liqui­da­ti­on stra­tegy com­bi­ne com­pli­ance with insol­ven­cy law with legal con­for­mi­ty — and gain the free­dom to focus on the cru­cial issues of con­duc­ting the pro­cee­dings.

We are publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eers (auc­tion­eers) with over 15 years of expe­ri­ence in the rea­liza­ti­on of legal and con­trac­tu­al pled­ges of rights in legal­ly com­pli­ant online auc­tions with live stream.

Do you have a spe­ci­fic case? Then get in touch with us: TO THE CONT­ACT FORM.

Cont­act us — tog­e­ther for a suc­cessful result!

Fur­ther artic­les on the topic

Pfand­rech­te an Geschäfts­an­tei­len: opti­mier­tes Ver­wer­tungs­in­stru­ment in der For­de­rungs­rea­li­sie­rung durch Anteils­ver­kauf

Pledge of rights — ever­y­thing you need to know explai­ned. A pledge of rights can rela­te to things, i.e. phy­si­cal objects, as well as to rights of any kind, such as com­pa­ny shares, patents, secu­ri­ties, IP rights, domains, licen­ses or trade­mark rights.

Public Auc­tion (Gover­nan­ce & Audit‑Trail) vs. Work­out vs. Distres­sed M&A: opti­mier­ter Anteils­ver­kauf
Public Auc­tion Pledge of rights Com­pa­ny shares, busi­ness shares, rights of all kinds (IP rights, domains) and their rea­liza­ti­on in pledge auc­tions Auc­tions as online auc­tions Online auc­tion Online auc­tion Pledge rea­liza­ti­on Public auc­tion by publicly appoin­ted sworn auc­tion­eer Auc­tion­eer

Share post:

Facebook
X
LinkedIn

Further contributions: