Col­la­te­ral enforce­ment for finan­cial insti­tu­ti­ons.

Dis­clai­mer of lia­bi­li­ty: We do not pro­vi­de legal or tax advice, only prac­ti­cal infor­ma­ti­on. The con­tent of this web­site is a pre­sen­ta­ti­on of our acti­vi­ties and not an adver­ti­se­ment.

Col­la­te­ral rea­liza­ti­on of com­pa­ny shares, secu­ri­ties, patents, trade­mark rights, licen­sing rights, IP rights and domains based on con­trac­tu­al lien agree­ments or sta­tu­to­ry pro­vi­si­ons

Pled­ges of rights as a stra­te­gic finan­cial instru­ment for sus­tainable liqui­di­ty

In a capi­tal-inten­si­ve eco­no­my cha­rac­te­ri­zed by vola­ti­li­ty, pled­ges of rights are not just defen­si­ve col­la­te­ral. Used cor­rect­ly, they act as a stra­te­gic liqui­di­ty and risk lever: they mobi­li­ze tied-up capi­tal, sta­bi­li­ze the balan­ce sheet and redu­ce default risks.

Com­pa­nies, finan­ciers and cre­di­tors can make tar­ge­ted use of con­trac­tu­al or sta­tu­to­ry pled­ges of rights to rea­li­ze claims quick­ly and secu­re their finan­cial capa­ci­ty to act. The decisi­ve fac­tor is not the mere exis­tence of the col­la­te­ral, but its pro­fes­sio­nal, value-pre­ser­ving rea­liza­ti­on. In an envi­ron­ment of incre­asing pro­cess dura­ti­on, plan­ning uncer­tain­ty and mar­gin pres­su­re, time beco­mes an eco­no­mic risk fac­tor. Delays regu­lar­ly lead to los­ses in value and con­tra­dict the duty to mini­mi­ze los­ses (Sec­tion 43 (1) GmbG).

Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tung imple­ments pled­ges of rights in a legal­ly com­pli­ant, tran­sac­tion-effi­ci­ent and mar­ket-ori­en­ted man­ner. As publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eers, we rea­li­ze col­la­te­ral in trans­pa­rent pro­ce­du­res that are geared towards maxi­mi­zing pro­ceeds and a rapid inflow of funds. The result: pre­dic­ta­ble liqui­di­ty with clear risk limi­ta­ti­on.

Public auc­tion as an effi­ci­ent alter­na­ti­ve to M&A pro­ces­ses
The rea­liza­ti­on of pled­ged com­pa­ny shares or other rights by public auc­tion offers struc­tu­ral advan­ta­ges over tra­di­tio­nal M&A tran­sac­tions: The legal­ly com­pli­ant pro­cess (Sec­tion 1235 BGB) is fas­ter, more cost-effi­ci­ent and avo­ids leng­thy purcha­se pri­ce and con­tract nego­tia­ti­ons. Due dili­gence can be car­ri­ed out as a sup­port­i­ve mea­su­re, but is not a pre­re­qui­si­te for the legal effect of the final award (Sec­tion 156 BGB).

The fixed auc­tion date also streng­thens the nego­tia­ting posi­ti­on vis-à-vis deb­tors or insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tors. The knock­down results in an irre­vo­ca­ble, legal­ly com­pli­ant trans­fer; typi­cal tran­sac­tion uncer­tain­ties such as earn-out clau­ses or MAC reser­va­tions no lon­ger app­ly. The purcha­se pri­ce is bin­din­gly deter­mi­ned as part of the knock­down; sub­se­quent adjus­t­ments are excluded. Pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 445 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB), the purcha­se is sub­ject to the exclu­si­on of any war­ran­ty.

Pro­ven fields of appli­ca­ti­on
The public auc­tion is par­ti­cu­lar­ly sui­ta­ble for

  • the rea­liza­ti­on of pled­ged rights (IP, com­pa­ny shares) and high-value assets in the event of immi­nent or actu­al insol­ven­cy,

  • Con­stel­la­ti­ons such as cadu­ca­ti­on or aban­don­ment,

  • as well as all cases in which a fast, fair and mar­ket-based rea­liza­ti­on of rights is requi­red.

Exe­cu­ti­on strength and mar­ket approach
We have many years of expe­ri­ence in the pre­pa­ra­ti­on of com­plex struc­tures. We explain the legal and eco­no­mic para­me­ters to poten­ti­al buy­ers in a pre­cise and com­pre­hen­si­ble man­ner so that the num­ber of bidders is increased and the suc­cess of the sale is maxi­mi­zed. Our aim is a rea­liza­ti­on that meets the stan­dards of pro­fes­sio­nal capi­tal mar­ket play­ers, both eco­no­mic­al­ly and pro­ce­du­ral­ly.

We spe­cia­li­ze in the explo­ita­ti­on of rights of all kinds

Solid inves­tor net­work

Part of a net­work of high­ly spe­cia­li­zed lawy­ers, audi­tors and tax con­sul­tants as well as res­truc­tu­ring and reor­ga­niza­ti­on con­sul­tants.

Iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on and sel­ec­tion

Com­mer­cial exper­ti­se in gene­ra­ting sui­ta­ble pro­s­pec­ti­ve buy­ers, natio­nal­ly and inter­na­tio­nal­ly, for the hig­hest auc­tion pro­ceeds.

Pool of pro­s­pec­ti­ve buy­ers

Ongo­ing cont­act with ven­ture capi­ta­lists, fami­ly offices and pri­va­te inves­tors through our inves­tor regis­ter.

Trans­pa­ren­cy and new opti­ons for action

In rela­ti­on to the pre­vious mana­ging direc­tors, also with regard to pos­si­ble cri­mi­nal mis­con­duct when chan­ging from cre­di­tor to acti­ve owner.

Many years of expe­ri­ence

For over fif­teen years, we have been ent­rus­ted with the explo­ita­ti­on of rights — secu­ri­ties, com­pa­ny shares, patents, IP rights, trade­mark rights, domains.

Time and cost savings

No time-con­sum­ing and cost-inten­si­ve dun­ning and legal pro­cee­dings neces­sa­ry.

Auc­tions of com­pa­ny shares and rights based on sta­tu­to­ry pled­ges of rights:

Auc­tion § 65 para. 3 AktG

Accor­ding to Sec­tion 65 (3) of the Ger­man Stock Cor­po­ra­ti­on Act (AktG), the com­pa­ny must sell the shares of share­hol­ders excluded due to non-pay­ment of the con­tri­bu­ti­on. In accordance with Sec­tion 214 AktG, the com­pa­ny must sell the new shares issued from share­hol­der funds after the capi­tal increase that have not been coll­ec­ted by the share­hol­ders after one year. In the event of a capi­tal reduc­tion through a con­so­li­da­ti­on of shares, the stock cor­po­ra­ti­on must sell the new shares issued in place of the shares declared null and void (226 para. 3 AktG).

In all cases, the shares must be sold at the offi­ci­al stock exch­an­ge pri­ce through a bro­ker. If the­re is no stock exch­an­ge pri­ce, the shares must be sold by public auc­tion. (Com­pul­so­ry exclu­si­on of share­hol­ders of a GmbH or AG.

§ Sec­tion 23 GmbHG Auc­tion of the share

If pay­ment of the amount in arre­ars can­not be obtai­ned from legal tran­sac­tions, the com­pa­ny may have the share sold by public auc­tion. Any other type of sale is only per­mit­ted with the con­sent of the excluded share­hol­der.

Vol­un­t­a­ry auc­tion of com­pa­ny shares

The sale of com­pa­ny shares such as stocks, limi­t­ed lia­bi­li­ty com­pa­nies or limi­t­ed part­ner­ship shares can some­ti­mes gene­ra­te bet­ter pro­ceeds than the sale via the usu­al tra­ding venues.

Debt-to-equi­ty swap

Share deals are play­ing an incre­asing­ly important role. Cre­di­tors can be forced to con­vert their claims into shares (debt-to-equi­ty) even against their will. As a rule, cre­di­tors have no inte­rest in beco­ming share­hol­ders. We offer the desi­red exit by sel­ling the shares at auc­tion.

Out of insol­ven­cy

The­re are advan­ta­ges to acqui­ring com­pa­ny shares out of insol­ven­cy. The buy­er then does not have to assu­me respon­si­bi­li­ty for the insol­vent com­pany’s exis­ting tax obli­ga­ti­ons or other lia­bi­li­ties under com­mer­cial law. The sale can be arran­ged in such a way that all exis­ting lia­bi­li­ties remain with the insol­vent com­pa­ny.

The pri­va­te sale of com­pa­ny shares in insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings can also be car­ri­ed out by a publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer.

The insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor must sell the com­pa­ny at the best pos­si­ble pri­ce. If he uses the gene­ral­ly publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer for the sale, this is legal­ly valid due to the sur­ro­ga­te prin­ci­ple. The insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor does not need to obtain appr­oval from the cre­di­tors’ com­mit­tee, as con­trol is ensu­red by the public auc­tion becau­se the gene­ral­ly publicly appoin­ted auc­tion­eer is sworn to per­form his task con­sci­en­tious­ly and impar­ti­al­ly.

Aban­don­ment right (right to sell) § 27 GmbHG

The share­hol­der of a limi­t­ed lia­bi­li­ty com­pa­ny has the right of aban­don­ment if he is unwil­ling or unable to ful­fill an obli­ga­ti­on to make an unli­mi­t­ed addi­tio­nal pay­ment. He can then release his share in the com­pa­ny.

Accor­din­gly, in the event of an unli­mi­t­ed obli­ga­ti­on to make addi­tio­nal con­tri­bu­ti­ons, the share­hol­der can exempt hims­elf from pay­ing the addi­tio­nal con­tri­bu­ti­on deman­ded by making his share available to the com­pa­ny. The share must be sold by public auc­tion

Kadu­zie­rung § 21 GmbHG and (com­pul­so­ry exclu­si­on of share­hol­ders of a GmbH or a § 64 AktG)

1) In the event of delay­ed pay­ment, the defaul­ting share­hol­der may be issued with a new request for pay­ment within a grace peri­od to be deter­mi­ned, under thre­at of exclu­si­on from the share to which pay­ment is to be made. The request shall be sent by regis­tered let­ter. The grace peri­od must be at least one month.

(2) If the dead­line expi­res wit­hout result, the defaul­ting share­hol­der shall be declared to have for­fei­ted his share and the par­ti­al pay­ments made in favor of the com­pa­ny. The decla­ra­ti­on shall be made by regis­tered let­ter.

(3) The excluded share­hol­der shall remain lia­ble to the com­pa­ny for the loss suf­fe­r­ed by the com­pa­ny in respect of the amount in arre­ars or the amounts of the capi­tal con­tri­bu­ti­on sub­se­quent­ly clai­med on the share.

Sett­le­ment § 2042 BGB

(1) Each co-heir may demand sett­le­ment at any time, unless other­wi­se pro­vi­ded for in sec­tions 2043 to 2045.

(2) The pro­vi­si­ons of sec­tion 749 (2), (3) and sec­tions 750 to 758 shall app­ly. Each heir may at any time demand the sett­le­ment of the com­mu­ni­ty of heirs, unless the sett­le­ment is excluded in the will or the­re are reasons for post­po­ning it. If the heirs fail to reach an agree­ment on the sett­le­ment, the com­mu­ni­ty shall be dis­sol­ved by sel­ling the com­mon pro­per­ty in accordance with the pro­vi­si­ons on the sale of pled­ges.

Can­cel­la­ti­on of the enti­re estate § 1922 BGB

(1) Upon the death of a per­son (suc­ces­si­on), their assets (inhe­ri­tance) shall pass in their enti­re­ty to one or more other per­sons (heirs).

(2) The pro­vi­si­ons rela­ting to the inhe­ri­tance shall app­ly to the share of a co-heir (inhe­ri­tance share).

Pledge § 1293 BGB on bea­rer secu­ri­ties

The pro­vi­si­ons on the pledge of rights to mova­ble pro­per­ty also app­ly to the pledge of rights to bea­rer secu­ri­ties.

Rea­liza­ti­on of lien on the basis of § 825 ZPO

Bai­liffs work exclu­si­ve­ly in their assi­gned dis­trict and have many dif­fe­rent tasks to per­form. Con­duc­ting public auc­tions is only a small part of their work. In prac­ti­ce, bai­liffs refu­se such an assign­ment — due to func­tion­al incom­pe­tence (alter­na­tively accor­ding to § 191 No. 1 GVGA) — also with the refe­rence that sui­ta­ble publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eers are available. Bai­liffs may refu­se wit­hout giving reasons, sec­tion 191 (1) GVGA. See also: OLG Colo­gne, decis­i­on 30.12.1999 — AZ: 7 VA 2/99.

The short-term and best pos­si­ble rea­liza­ti­on of objects or rights of all kinds sei­zed by the bai­liff on the basis of a judgment is often not pos­si­ble or sen­si­ble on site. The requi­re­ment to keep cos­ts to a mini­mum alre­a­dy pre­vents the judi­cial offi­cer from adver­ti­sing the pled­ged object appro­pria­te­ly. On the other hand, attrac­ting natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal buy­ers and car­ry­ing out col­la­te­ral enforce­ment is cle­ar­ly within the core com­pe­tence of the publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer. The enforce­ment court aut­ho­ri­zes the auc­tion by ano­ther per­son (the auc­tion­eer) at the cre­di­tor’s request. The appli­ca­ti­on must be made by the cre­di­tor. Plea­se cont­act us if you have any ques­ti­ons. We can give you valuable advice from our prac­ti­cal expe­ri­ence.

§ Sec­tion 825 ZPO Other type of rea­liza­ti­on

(1) At the request of the cre­di­tor or the deb­tor, the judi­cial offi­cer may rea­li­ze an atta­ched object in a man­ner or at a place other than that spe­ci­fied in the pre­ce­ding para­graphs. The judi­cial offi­cer must inform the defen­dant of the inten­ded rea­liza­ti­on. Wit­hout the con­sent of the defen­dant, he may not rea­li­ze the object befo­re the expiry of two weeks after ser­vice of the noti­fi­ca­ti­on.
(2) The enforce­ment court may order the auc­tio­ning of a sei­zed item by a per­son other than the bai­liff at the request of the cre­di­tor or the deb­tor.

Auc­tions accor­ding to § 825 ZPO

Pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 825 (2) ZPO, the enforce­ment court may, at the cre­di­tor’s request, order that the auc­tion of pled­ged items be con­duc­ted by a per­son other than the bai­liff. The gene­ral­ly publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer may be appoin­ted to con­duct the auc­tion. The pur­po­se of sec­tion 825 (2) ZPO is, among other things, to enable the auc­tio­ning of a pled­ged pro­per­ty by the gene­ral­ly publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer if the auc­tion by the bai­liff can­not be expec­ted to yield pro­ceeds cor­re­spon­ding to the true value of the pro­per­ty.

Auc­tions of com­pa­ny shares and rights based on con­trac­tu­al pled­ges of rights:

pur­su­ant to § 793 BGB Bonds to bea­rer
(1) If someone has issued a docu­ment in which he pro­mi­ses the hol­der of the docu­ment a per­for­mance (bond on the hol­der), the hol­der may demand per­for­mance from him in accordance with the pro­mi­se, unless he is not entit­led to dis­po­se of the docu­ment. Howe­ver, the issuer is also released by the per­for­mance to a hol­der who is not entit­led to dis­po­se of the docu­ment.
(2) The vali­di­ty of the signa­tu­re may be made depen­dent on the obser­van­ce of a spe­cial form by a pro­vi­si­on included in the docu­ment. A signa­tu­re made by mecha­ni­cal repro­duc­tion shall be suf­fi­ci­ent for sig­ning.

Bea­rer bonds are bank bonds, savings bank bonds, savings bank cer­ti­fi­ca­tes, savings bonds, regis­tered bonds, public bonds, indus­tri­al bonds, con­ver­ti­ble bonds, cer­ti­fi­ca­tes, mor­tga­ge bonds, indus­tri­al bonds, etc.

The issuers of bea­rer bonds are com­pa­nies from trade, indus­try, trans­port and the ban­king sec­tor that are eli­gi­ble to issue bonds. They have been admit­ted to regu­la­ted stock exch­an­ge tra­ding in accordance with Sec­tion 32 et seq. of the Ger­man Stock Exch­an­ge Act.

Bea­rer bonds are secu­ri­ties that secu­ri­ti­ze claims against bor­ro­wers. They are issued as bea­rer secu­ri­ties for trans­fer. Each hol­der may demand the pro­mi­sed per­for­mance from the deb­tor.

The hol­der of a bea­rer bond is also pre­su­med to be its owner. Sec­tion 935 (2) BGB sti­pu­la­tes that the deb­tor must make pay­ment to the hol­der of bea­rer bonds that have been sto­len, lost or other­wi­se come into cir­cu­la­ti­on wit­hout the debtor’s con­sent.

The issuer’s obli­ga­ti­on to pay is trig­ge­red by the pre­sen­ta­ti­on of the cer­ti­fi­ca­te. The issuer may only refu­se pay­ment if the issue of the cer­ti­fi­ca­te is inva­lid or if the­re are objec­tions (such as lack of matu­ri­ty). Due to their infor­mal trans­fera­bi­li­ty, bea­rer instru­ments are high­ly fun­gi­ble. Their legal sta­tus is regu­la­ted in accordance with § 793 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB) and the owner of this docu­ment is not named. With the libe­ra­liza­ti­on of the capi­tal mar­ket in 1990, the appr­oval requi­re­ment was abo­lished.

Bonds may be sold by way of auc­tion by the gene­ral­ly publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer.

in accordance with § 1195 BGB bea­rer land char­ge cer­ti­fi­ca­te

A land char­ge may be crea­ted in such a way that the land char­ge cer­ti­fi­ca­te is issued to the bea­rer. The pro­vi­si­ons on bea­rer bonds app­ly accor­din­gly to such a let­ter.

The land char­ge cer­ti­fi­ca­tes can be sold by auc­tion by a gene­ral­ly publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer.

in accordance with § 1199 BGB Ren­ten­schuld­brief

(1) A land char­ge can be crea­ted in such a way that a cer­tain sum of money is to be paid from the pro­per­ty at regu­lar­ly recur­ring inter­vals (annui­ty debt).

(2) When the annui­ty debt is crea­ted, the amount must be deter­mi­ned by the pay­ment of which the annui­ty debt can be rede­e­med. The redemp­ti­on amount must be spe­ci­fied in the land regis­ter.

In prac­ti­ce, this land char­ge is used as a life annui­ty for the pur­po­se of reti­re­ment pro­vi­si­on. A fixed sum of money is to be paid at regu­lar inter­vals from an encum­be­red pro­per­ty.
This con­s­truct is also used in agri­cul­tu­re. Far­mers are thus able to satis­fy their cre­di­tors from cur­rent inco­me.

pur­su­ant to § 1204 — 1208 BGB mova­ble pro­per­ty (Lom­bard tran­sac­tions)

§ Sec­tion 1204 Legal con­tent of the pledge of rights to mova­ble pro­per­ty

(1) A mova­ble pro­per­ty may be encum­be­red to secu­re a cla­im in such a way that the cre­di­tor is entit­led to seek satis­fac­tion from the pro­per­ty (pledge of rights).
(2) The pledge of rights may also be crea­ted for a future or con­di­tio­nal cla­im.

§ Sec­tion 1205 Crea­ti­on
(1) In order to crea­te a pledge, the owner must hand over the object to the cre­di­tor and both par­ties must agree that the cre­di­tor is to be entit­led to the pledge of rights. If the cre­di­tor is in pos­ses­si­on of the object, agree­ment on the crea­ti­on of the pledge of rights is suf­fi­ci­ent.

(2) The trans­fer of an item in the indi­rect pos­ses­si­on of the owner may be repla­ced by the owner trans­fer­ring the indi­rect pos­ses­si­on to the pled­gee and noti­fy­ing the owner of the pledge.

§ Sec­tion 1206 Sub­sti­tu­ti­on of sur­ren­der by gran­ting joint pos­ses­si­on
Ins­tead of the sur­ren­der of the object, the gran­ting of joint pos­ses­si­on is suf­fi­ci­ent if the object is under the joint con­trol of the cre­di­tor or, if it is in the pos­ses­si­on of a third par­ty, the sur­ren­der can only be made joint­ly to the owner and the cre­di­tor.

§ Sec­tion 1207 Pled­ging by a non-entit­led par­ty
If the object does not belong to the pled­ger, the pro­vi­si­ons of sec­tions 932, 934 and 935 appli­ca­ble to the acqui­si­ti­on of owner­ship shall app­ly muta­tis mut­an­dis to the pledge.

§ Sec­tion 1208 Acqui­si­ti­on of prio­ri­ty in good faith
If the item is encum­be­red with the right of a third par­ty, the pledge of rights shall take pre­ce­dence over the right, unless the pled­gee is not in good faith with regard to the right at the time of acqui­ring the pledge. The pro­vi­si­ons of sec­tion 932 (1) sen­tence 2, sec­tion 935 and sec­tion 936 (3) shall app­ly accor­din­gly.

Auc­tion of mova­ble pro­per­ty pled­ged as secu­ri­ty
The con­di­ti­ons for the effec­ti­ve crea­ti­on of a con­trac­tu­al pledge of rights are set out in the

§§ Sec­tions 1204 to 1208 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB) . This is important for lom­bard tran­sac­tions of cre­dit insti­tu­ti­ons and other len­ders and for com­mer­cial pawn­bro­kers.

Short-term loans are gran­ted against mova­ble, fun­gi­ble assets (e.g. secu­ri­ties, bills of exch­an­ge, receiv­a­bles, goods and pre­cious metals) as col­la­te­ral. The amount of the Lom­bard loans ran­ges from 50% to 90% of the pled­ged assets and rights.

In the event of default under the loan agree­ment, this col­la­te­ral can be sold by the publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer by way of auc­tion or pri­va­te sale.

in accordance with § 1293 BGB Bea­rer secu­ri­ties

Pledge of rights to bea­rer secu­ri­ties in accordance with § 1293 BGB: The pro­vi­si­ons on the pledge of rights on mova­ble pro­per­ty also app­ly to the pledge of rights on bea­rer secu­ri­ties. This appli­es to bea­rer bonds (§ 793 BGB), bea­rer land char­ge cer­ti­fi­ca­tes (§ 1195 BGB), annui­ty bonds (§ 1199 BGB), bea­rer shares (§ 10 para. 1 AktG) and invest­ment cer­ti­fi­ca­tes.

§ Sec­tion 793 BGB rights from the bond to the bea­rer

(1) If someone has issued a docu­ment in which he pro­mi­ses the hol­der of the docu­ment a per­for­mance (bond on the hol­der), the hol­der may demand per­for­mance from him in accordance with the pro­mi­se, unless he is not entit­led to dis­po­se of the docu­ment. Howe­ver, the issuer is also released by the per­for­mance to a hol­der who is not entit­led to dis­po­se of the docu­ment.

(2) The vali­di­ty of the signa­tu­re may be made depen­dent on the obser­van­ce of a spe­cial form by a pro­vi­si­on included in the docu­ment. A signa­tu­re made by mecha­ni­cal repro­duc­tion shall be suf­fi­ci­ent for sig­ning.

§ Sec­tion 1195 BGB Bea­rer land char­ge

A land char­ge may be crea­ted in such a way that the land char­ge cer­ti­fi­ca­te is issued to the bea­rer. The pro­vi­si­ons on bea­rer bonds app­ly accor­din­gly to such a let­ter.

§ Sec­tion 1199 Legal con­tent of the annui­ty debt

(1) A land char­ge can be crea­ted in such a way that a cer­tain sum of money is to be paid from the pro­per­ty at regu­lar­ly recur­ring inter­vals (annui­ty debt).
(2) When the annui­ty debt is crea­ted, the amount must be deter­mi­ned by the pay­ment of which the annui­ty debt can be rede­e­med. The redemp­ti­on amount must be spe­ci­fied in the land regis­ter.

in accordance with § 5 SchG bea­rer check
The prac­ti­ce of pled­ging bea­rer checks, which is com­mon in other count­ries, is rare­ly used in Ger­ma­ny.
pur­su­ant to § 18 (1) KAGG Invest­ment unit cer­ti­fi­ca­te
Invest­ment units may be sold by the publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer by way of over-the-coun­ter sale or auc­tion.

Ques­ti­ons about:

Cos­ts

Mana­geable cos­ts

We are obli­ged to car­ry out the valua­ti­on and rea­liza­ti­on at reasonable cos­ts, taking into account the rights of all par­ties invol­ved. The amount is based on the type of pledge and the effort requi­red to achie­ve ade­qua­te rea­liza­ti­on pro­ceeds in the inte­rests of the deb­tor. As remu­ne­ra­ti­on for his expen­ses and acti­vi­ties, the auc­tion­eer recei­ves a lump sum from the cli­ent and a so-cal­led pre­mi­um on the ham­mer pri­ce from the buy­ers. In order to avo­id any accu­sa­ti­on of squan­de­ring, the pledge should be adver­ti­sed in an appro­pria­te form. The grea­ter the demand for the pled­ged item, the lower the flat fee.

Important to know: The deb­tor bears the cos­ts of the pro­cee­dings. Unrea­lizable cos­ts can be clai­med as expen­ses for tax pur­po­ses by the cre­di­tor.

The Auc­tion­eer shall have unli­mi­t­ed and per­so­nal lia­bi­li­ty for cul­pa­ble brea­ches of duty. The cli­ent can­not release the auc­tion­eer from this lia­bi­li­ty for dama­ges. The auc­tion­eer’s remu­ne­ra­ti­on is the­r­e­fo­re always also a lia­bi­li­ty remu­ne­ra­ti­on.

Spe­cial situa­ti­on insol­ven­cy

Quick gui­de for finan­cial insti­tu­ti­ons and funds
Rea­liza­ti­on of pled­ged com­pa­ny shares or rights in the event of insol­ven­cy

What it’s all about

  • Pledge on rights ≠ Pledge on tan­gi­ble assets; rights are not eli­gi­ble for pos­ses­si­on. § Sec­tion 166 InsO is the­r­e­fo­re not appli­ca­ble.
  • The right of rea­liza­ti­on lies sole­ly with the pled­gee.
  • Sta­tu­to­ry stan­dard form: public auc­tion in accordance with §§ 1228 ff., 1235 BGB.
  • Sale by pri­va­te trea­ty (§ 1245 BGB) after the ope­ning of insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings is inadmissible/void becau­se neither the pled­ger nor the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor can effec­tively con­sent.

Do’s — what to do imme­dia­te­ly

  • Actively assu­me the role of pled­gee; no dele­ga­ti­on of rea­liza­ti­on to insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor or M&A advi­sor.
  • Appoint a publicly appoin­ted and sworn auc­tion­eer (§ 34b GewO). This is the only way to crea­te a legal­ly bin­ding award (§ 156 BGB).
  • Initia­te reco­very imme­dia­te­ly; delay may result in dama­ge and lia­bi­li­ty.
  • Defi­ne pro­cess set­up: Announce­ment of the auc­tion with core data (§ 1237 BGB); con­fi­den­ti­al infor­ma­ti­on exclu­si­ve­ly via data room accor­ding to NDA.
  • Request coope­ra­ti­on and docu­ments from the debtor/administrator; secu­ri­ty agree­ment regu­lar­ly con­ta­ins cor­re­spon­ding obli­ga­ti­ons.

Don’ts — typi­cal lia­bi­li­ty traps

  • No M&A “auc­tion sale”/bidding pro­ce­du­re ins­tead of the sta­tu­to­ry auc­tion. This is legal­ly not an auc­tion.
  • No sale by pri­va­te trea­ty after the ope­ning of insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings — not even on the basis of an ear­lier con­trac­tu­al clau­se (Sec­tion 1245 BGB)
  • No sub­se­quent agree­ments with the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor on the type of rea­liza­ti­on, pro­cess or pri­ce.

When excep­tio­nal­ly market/broker rea­liza­ti­on?

  • Only if an objec­ti­ve mar­ket or stock exch­an­ge pri­ce exists: Rea­liza­ti­on via a com­mer­cial bro­ker or a per­son aut­ho­ri­zed to con­duct public auc­tions (§ 1221 BGB).
  • In the case of com­pa­ny shares, the­re is usual­ly no objec­ti­ve mar­ket pri­ce → public auc­tion remains man­da­to­ry.

Lia­bi­li­ty risks in the event of devia­ti­on

  • Insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor: Lia­bi­li­ty pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 60 InsO in the event of unaut­ho­ri­zed or delay­ed liqui­da­ti­on.
  • M&A advisors/law firms: Tor­tious lia­bi­li­ty (Sec­tions 823 (2), 826 BGB) for invol­vement in unaut­ho­ri­zed explo­ita­ti­on struc­tures.
  • Pledgee/creditor’s repre­sen­ta­ti­ve: Lia­bi­li­ty for orga­niza­ti­on and advice (§ 280 BGB) in the event of unlawful action.
  • Cri­mi­nal risk: breach of trust (§ 266 StGB) in the event of asset manage­ment in breach of duty.

Prac­ti­cal recom­men­da­ti­on (work­flow)

  • Insol­ven­cy signal (application/preliminary admi­nis­tra­tor) → inter­nal switch to “col­la­te­ral enforce­ment right”.
  • Man­da­te a publicly appoin­ted auc­tion­eer.
  • Set up data room/NDA; defi­ne auc­tion infor­ma­ti­on.
  • Sche­du­le and announ­ce the auc­tion.
  • Award, reve­nue reco­gni­ti­on and com­ple­te docu­men­ta­ti­on for audit trail.

If the rea­liza­ti­on of col­la­te­ral
is time-cri­ti­cal and con­fi­den­ti­al:
Cont­act us.

Ele­ment #1
Ele­ment #1