Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tung — Our exper­ti­se and ser­vices in lien law.

Why Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tung?

Exe­cu­ti­on Cer­tain­ty for Com­plex Col­la­te­ral Struc­tures

The rea­liza­ti­on of pled­ged equi­ty inte­rests and IP rights by way of public auc­tion is a cle­ar­ly struc­tu­red and effi­ci­ent exe­cu­ti­on path. Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tung pro­vi­des an end-to-end pro­cess through to regis­tra­ti­on-rea­dy com­ple­ti­on. It is cle­ar­ly struc­tu­red, fast, final and robust.

For the pled­gee and its legal coun­sel, the requi­red invol­vement remains limi­t­ed. In prac­ti­cal terms, coun­sel to the pled­gee is only requi­red to take the fol­lo­wing steps:

  1. com­ple­te the online Enforce­ment Pre­re­qui­si­tes Con­fir­ma­ti­on Form to con­firm that the civil law pre­re­qui­si­tes for rea­liza­ti­on have been satis­fied;
  2. pro­vi­de the rele­vant case data and sup­port­ing docu­men­ta­ti­on for case assess­ment and data room set­up; and
  3. exe­cu­te the auc­tion agree­ment, eit­her direct­ly or through the cli­ent.

Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tung then mana­ges the pro­cess through to com­ple­ti­on of the auc­tion in accordance with appli­ca­ble law.
This includes, in par­ti­cu­lar, the pro­cess and com­pli­ance frame­work, the digi­tal public auc­tion, the award, pay­ment and com­ple­ti­on secu­ri­ty, and trans­fer docu­men­ta­ti­on in regis­tra­ble form.

The public auc­tion of pled­ged equi­ty inte­rests and IP rights is con­duc­ted pur­su­ant to Sec­tions 1235 and 383 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB), as amen­ded. The pro­vi­si­ons of the Ger­man Code of Civil Pro­ce­du­re (ZPO) and the Ger­man Act on Forced Sale and Recei­ver­ship (ZVG) do not app­ly to publicly appoin­ted and sworn auc­tion­eers.

Public Auc­tion as a Sta­tu­to­ry Enforce­ment Mecha­nism with Clear Legal Fina­li­ty

In situa­tions whe­re ren­ego­tia­ti­on, matu­ri­ty exten­si­on, or a pri­va­te sale pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 1245 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB) do not pro­vi­de a via­ble path to com­ple­ti­on, Ger­man law pro­vi­des for a public auc­tion as a stan­dar­di­zed, trans­pa­rent, and final rea­liza­ti­on mecha­nism. Such pro­cess is con­duc­ted through publicly appoin­ted and sworn auc­tion­eers. For secu­red cre­di­tors, this crea­tes a struc­tu­red and exe­cu­ti­on-cer­tain exit with clear legal fina­li­ty.

In share pledge enforce­ment and time-cri­ti­cal distres­sed situa­tions, we act as a dis­creet, legal­ly com­pli­ant exe­cu­ti­on part­ner. We ope­ra­te cross-bor­der for len­ding syn­di­ca­tes, inter­cre­di­tor struc­tures, and inter­na­tio­nal finan­cings within Ger­man juris­dic­tion.

Stan­dar­di­zed Enforce­ment Frame­work — Ful­ly Docu­men­ted Exe­cu­ti­on

As publicly appoin­ted and sworn auc­tion­eers, we exe­cu­te pledge enforce­ments in our sta­tu­to­ry capa­ci­ty pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 383 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB).

The award of the auc­tion clo­ses the pro­cess with legal effect; sig­ning and clo­sing occur simul­ta­neous­ly. The result is a clear time­line and sta­tu­to­ry as well as eco­no­mic fina­li­ty.

Ger­man law pro­vi­des a stream­li­ned, low-fric­tion, and mar­ket-ori­en­ted pro­cess. Our dif­fe­ren­tia­tor is the stan­dar­di­zed end-to-end exe­cu­ti­on frame­work we have deve­lo­ped for com­plex collateral—delivery and docu­men­ta­ti­on within the sta­tu­to­ry peri­me­ter. We deploy GDPR-com­pli­ant (i.e. DSGVO in Euro­pe) AI to sup­port valua­ti­on, bidder out­reach, and pro­cess acce­le­ra­ti­on. The result: fast to exe­cu­te, trans­pa­rent in pro­cess, robust­ly docu­men­ted, lia­bi­li­ty-light, and final.

Public auc­tion con­sti­tu­tes the sta­tu­to­ry default mecha­nism for pledge enforce­ment under Sec­tions 1235 et seq. BGB; it estab­lishes legal cla­ri­ty and fina­li­ty. Valua­ti­on is effec­ted pur­su­ant to the prin­ci­ple of sub­sti­tu­ti­on (Sur­ro­ga­ti­ons­prin­zip) by sove­reign act.

Rele­vant for Pri­va­te Cre­dit, Risk Advi­so­ry, Res­truc­tu­ring Advi­sors, and Tran­sac­tion Coun­sel

IRR-Rele­vant Para­me­ters (Time-to-Cash / Risk / Fina­li­ty)
Redu­ced dura­ti­on of capi­tal at risk through a pre­dic­ta­ble, short exe­cu­ti­on time­line; miti­ga­ti­on of clo­sing, re-tra­ding, and ren­ego­tia­ti­on risk; and defen­si­ble valua­ti­on through com­pe­ti­ti­ve pri­ce for­ma­ti­on and a docu­men­ted decis­i­on frame­work.

Exit Opti­ons / Work­out Capa­bi­li­ty
Pre­dic­ta­ble exit and work­out struc­tures pro­vi­ding a defen­si­ble basis for cre­dit, reco­very, and com­mit­tee decis­i­on-making. Public auc­tion as a cle­ar­ly delinea­ted, sta­tu­to­ry rea­liza­ti­on mechanism—particularly whe­re bila­te­ral solu­ti­ons (nego­tia­ti­on, matu­ri­ty exten­si­on, or a pri­va­te sale) are not via­ble.

Time­line / Time-to-Cash
Acce­le­ra­ted pro­cess imple­men­ta­ti­on from man­da­te (typi­cal dura­ti­on: 3–6 weeks) with cle­ar­ly defi­ned mile­sto­nes: vir­tu­al data room set­up, public noti­ce pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 1237 BGB, bidder qua­li­fi­ca­ti­on, auc­tion pro­cess, and for­mal award.

Repu­ta­ti­on / Stake­hol­der Expo­sure / Lia­bi­li­ty Miti­ga­ti­on
Inde­pen­dent and non-direc­ted con­duct of the pro­cess; a non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry bidder uni­ver­se; full infor­ma­ti­on pari­ty; and a robust docu­men­ta­ti­on trail. This redu­ces vul­nerabi­li­ty to chall­enge, alle­ga­ti­ons of underva­lue, and claims of sel­ec­ti­ve bidder stee­ring.

Key Con­side­ra­ti­ons

The public auc­tion is not a nego­tia­ti­on pro­cess, but a legal­ly com­pli­ant, sove­reig­n­ly legi­ti­mi­zed pro­ce­du­re; the knock­down ends the pro­ce­du­re in a legal­ly bin­ding man­ner and excludes any ren­ego­tia­ti­on. Sig­ning and clo­sing coin­ci­de in one act (§ 156 BGB) and bring about a rea­liza­ti­on with clear tem­po­ral and eco­no­mic fina­li­ty:

  • Cle­ar­ly defi­ned, legal­ly pro­vi­ded reco­very mecha­nism; clear sepa­ra­ti­on bet­ween the con­duct of pro­cee­dings and legal advice
  • Plan­nable exit and work­out struc­tures; relia­ble basis for cre­dit, reco­very and com­mit­tee decis­i­ons
  • Cos­ts: Full bur­den of cos­ts on the deb­tor as the initia­tor of the pro­cee­dings.
  • Irre­vo­ca­ble valua­ti­on by vir­tue of a sove­reign act
  • Final award ins­tead of open nego­tia­ti­on pro­ces­ses
  • No ren­ego­tia­ti­on, no clo­sing risk; no re-tra­ding risk
  • No ongo­ing con­trac­tu­al or exe­cu­ti­on risks
  • Objec­ti­ve, mar­ket-based pri­cing; mar­ket pri­ce deter­mi­na­ti­on through com­pe­ti­ti­on ins­tead of bila­te­ral nego­tia­ti­on
  • In the con­text of enforce­ment through a public auc­tion of cor­po­ra­te inte­rests, inclu­ding shares in a Ger­man GmbH, the auc­tion pro­to­col and the trans­fer decla­ra­ti­on recor­ded the­r­ein replace the nota­ri­al form other­wi­se requi­red under § 23 GmbHG. The auc­tion docu­men­ta­ti­on the­r­e­fo­re con­sti­tu­tes the legal basis for the trans­fer of title and for the sub­se­quent regis­tra­ti­on of the chan­ge in share­hol­ding in the com­mer­cial regis­ter.
  • Trans­pa­rent risk struc­tu­re (“as is”)
  • Redu­ced poten­ti­al for lia­bi­li­ty and dis­pu­tes
  • No right of rea­liza­ti­on of the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor for pled­ged rights (no appli­ca­ti­on of Sec­tion 166 (1) InsO for rights; BGH 27.02.2022 IX ZR 145/21). Rea­liza­ti­on is the respon­si­bi­li­ty of the pled­gee — ther­eby exclu­ding lia­bi­li­ty for pos­si­ble claims by indi­vi­du­al cre­di­tors or the cre­di­tors’ mee­ting
  • Docu­men­ted decis­i­on-making and award logic; high con­nec­ti­vi­ty to inter­nal decis­i­on-making and audi­ting pro­ces­ses, com­ple­te docu­men­ta­ti­on for com­pli­ance and audi­ting.

Our func­tion

We are publicly appoin­ted and aut­ho­ri­zed to con­duct public auc­tions (“Public Auc­tions”) and, in that capa­ci­ty, ope­ra­te as part of the jus­ti­ce sys­tem in a func­tion­al sen­se. We are sworn to inde­pen­dence, free­dom from ins­truc­tion, dili­gent per­for­mance, and con­fi­den­tia­li­ty vis-à-vis third par­ties. This is essen­ti­al becau­se the owner of the auc­tion­ed pro­per­ty has no con­trol over the sale pri­ce or the reser­ve (mini­mum bid) and must the­r­e­fo­re be able to rely on the auc­tion­eer to pro­tect his pro­prie­ta­ry inte­rests to a par­ti­cu­lar­ly qua­li­fied stan­dard. Public Auc­tions are con­duc­ted under the appli­ca­ble pro­vi­si­ons of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB), Com­mer­cial Code (HGB), Limi­t­ed Lia­bi­li­ty Com­pa­nies Act (GmbHG), Stock Cor­po­ra­ti­on Act (AktG), Anti-Money Laun­de­ring Act (GwG), Trade Regu­la­ti­on Act (GewO), and the Auc­tion­eers’ Ordi­nan­ce (VerstV). The Ger­man Code of Civil Pro­ce­du­re (ZPO), the Act on Com­pul­so­ry Auc­tion and Recei­ver­ship (ZVG), and the Court Bai­liffs’ Ser­vice Ins­truc­tions (GVGA) do not app­ly to publicly appoin­ted auc­tion­eers.

With the amend­ment of Sec­tion 383 BGB as of 01.01.2025, the legis­la­tor is cle­ar­ly focu­sing on the publicly appoin­ted and sworn auc­tion­eer. The group of per­sons aut­ho­ri­zed to con­duct public auc­tions is defi­ned and qua­li­ta­tively focu­sed. This means that the auc­tion­eer is not only de fac­to, but also ful­ly ancho­red in the law as a regu­lar actor. The legis­la­tor has thus made a clear eva­lua­ti­on decis­i­on. In the case of non-per­forming con­trac­tu­al rela­ti­onships, the legis­la­tor deli­bera­te­ly intends to bring about an effi­ci­ent, mar­ket-ori­en­ted and com­mer­ci­al­ly-ori­en­ted solu­ti­on to the sett­le­ment bet­ween cre­di­tor and deb­tor by appoin­ting a publicly appoin­ted and sworn auc­tion­eer.

Public auc­tion, as the sta­tu­to­ry default mecha­nism for pledge enforce­ment under Sec­tions 1235 et seq. BGB, pro­vi­des legal cla­ri­ty and fina­li­ty. Value is deter­mi­ned under the sub­sti­tu­ti­on prin­ci­ple (Sur­ro­ga­ti­ons­prin­zip) by sove­reign act through the public auc­tion pro­cess.

In spe­cial situa­tions, len­ders requi­re a robust, time-effi­ci­ent, and legal­ly com­pli­ant rea­liza­ti­on path that deli­vers a final out­co­me wit­hout post-clo­sing renegotiation—particularly whe­re pri­or nego­tia­ti­ons, exten­si­ons, or an attempt­ed pri­va­te sale under Sec­tion 1245 BGB have fai­led.

Legal requi­re­ments gover­ning the pro­per con­duct of a public auc­tion.

(1) Exis­tence of a Spe­ci­fic Pledge Right
A public auc­tion requi­res the valid exis­tence of a spe­ci­fic pledge right that entit­les the pled­gee to rea­li­ze the col­la­te­ral.

(2) Con­fir­ma­ti­on of Legal Pre­con­di­ti­ons
Pri­or to accep­ting the man­da­te, the auc­tion­eer must obtain the pledgee’s express con­fir­ma­ti­on that the civil law and regu­la­to­ry requi­re­ments for enforce­ment have been satis­fied.

(3) Trans­pa­ren­cy
Trans­pa­ren­cy is ensu­red through a vir­tu­al data room (in par­ti­cu­lar for rights and sen­si­ti­ve or high-value assets) con­tai­ning the rea­liza­ti­on-rele­vant docu­men­ta­ti­on curr­ent­ly known to and made available to the auc­tion­eer.
In the case of rights, this includes dis­clo­sure of all value-rele­vant cir­cum­s­tances known to the auc­tion­eer, in par­ti­cu­lar lia­bi­li­ties, legal and cor­po­ra­te rest­ric­tions, and other value-impai­ring factors—subject in all cases to full infor­ma­ti­on pari­ty among all bidders.

(4) Mar­ket Crea­ti­on
The auc­tion­eer is not requi­red to gua­ran­tee a mar­ket; howe­ver, the pro­cess must not be con­duc­ted whe­re it is evi­dent ex ante that com­pe­ti­ti­ve bid­ding is inten­tio­nal­ly pre­cluded. Public auc­tion requi­res appro­pria­te and pur­po­se-dri­ven noti­ce pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 1237 BGB direc­ted at the rele­vant purcha­ser uni­ver­se. The decisi­ve fac­tor is the actu­al crea­ti­on of com­pe­ti­ti­on.
The sta­tu­te does not defi­ne any mini­mum stan­dard as to spe­ci­fic publi­ca­ti­on media or reach. Com­men­ta­ry on Sec­tion 1237 BGB refers to pro­per noti­ce, appro­pria­ten­ess of publi­ca­ti­on, and the effec­ti­ve gene­ra­ti­on of com­pe­ti­ti­ve bid­ding.

(5) Inde­pen­dence of the Auc­tion­eer
The auc­tion­eer must act inde­pendent­ly and non-direc­ted; the pro­cess must not be stee­red or pre-shaped by indi­vi­du­al stake­hol­der interests—whether through the scope and man­ner of public noti­ce, the set­ting of the ope­ning bid, the pro­cess design, the for­mat, time or venue of the auc­tion, or the award decis­i­on.

(6) Appro­pria­te Ope­ning Bid (Avo­id­ance of Underva­lue Risk)
The ope­ning bid ser­ves sole­ly to faci­li­ta­te an order­ly pri­ce dis­co­very pro­cess and must not be set as an arti­fi­ci­al mini­mum value. Any pri­ce pre-deter­mi­na­ti­on that cons­trains com­pe­ti­ti­on crea­tes expo­sure to chall­enge and poten­ti­al lia­bi­li­ty based on alle­ga­ti­ons of rea­liza­ti­on at an underva­lue.

Our core exper­ti­se

Our publicly appoin­ted and sworn auc­tion­eers specialize—strategically and operationally—in the rea­liza­ti­on of col­la­te­ral based on con­trac­tu­al or sta­tu­to­ry pledge rights in distres­sed and enforce­ment situa­tions, with par­ti­cu­lar focus on the auc­tion of equi­ty inte­rests and IP rights such as trade­marks, patents, licen­ses, domains, as well as high-value tan­gi­ble assets.

Our strengths and capa­bi­li­ties

  • Legal­ly Com­pli­ant Exe­cu­ti­on:
    Each step of the pro­cess is docu­men­ted, traceable, and struc­tu­red to meet the expec­ta­ti­ons of courts and secu­red cre­di­tors; this miti­ga­tes lia­bi­li­ty expo­sure and enhan­ces pro­ce­du­ral defen­si­bi­li­ty and stake­hol­der accep­tance.
  • Pro­ven Pro­cess Struc­tu­re & Expe­ri­ence:
    Exten­si­ve, prac­ti­ce-tes­ted rea­liza­ti­on of rights of all kinds, com­bi­ned with tran­sac­tion-spe­ci­fic auc­tion design exper­ti­se.
  • Acce­le­ra­ted Pro­cess Exe­cu­ti­on:
    Pro­cess exe­cu­ti­on com­men­cing upon man­da­te, with a typi­cal time­line of 3–6 weeks.
  • Cross-Bor­der Enforce­ment Exper­ti­se:
    Exten­si­ve track record in struc­tu­ring and imple­men­ting cross-bor­der secu­ri­ty enforce­ment and col­la­te­ral mone­tiza­ti­on stra­te­gies, ali­gned with local law and len­der requi­re­ments.
  • Pro­ven Docu­men­ta­ti­on Suite:
    Prac­ti­ce-tes­ted con­trac­tu­al docu­men­ta­ti­on across all pro­cess pha­ses, inclu­ding the trans­fer agree­ment requi­red for imple­men­ta­ti­on on the com­mer­cial regis­ter (Han­dels­re­gis­ter).
  • Eva­lua­ti­on of Pro­s­pec­ti­ve Acqui­rers / Bidders:
    We con­duct a rigo­rous qua­li­fi­ca­ti­on pro­cess cove­ring finan­cial spon­sors, stra­te­gic buy­ers, oppor­tu­ni­stic inves­tors, and purcha­sers acting pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 1239 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB). Our struc­tu­red assess­ment frame­work ensu­res tran­sac­tion­al cer­tain­ty, enforcea­bi­li­ty, and ali­gnment with cre­di­tor inte­rests in distres­sed and spe­cial situa­ti­on sce­na­ri­os.
  • Inter­na­tio­nal Reach:
    Struc­tu­red digi­tal mar­ke­ting and disci­pli­ned inter­na­tio­nal bidder out­reach expand demand—particularly for IP rights, equi­ty inte­rests, and loca­ti­on-bound assets—while ensu­ring trans­pa­rent pri­ce dis­co­very, pro­ce­du­ral inte­gri­ty, and a defen­si­ble mar­ket pro­cess.
  • Non-Dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry Bidder Uni­ver­se & Com­pli­ance:
    We inte­gra­te cre­di­tor-nomi­na­ted pro­s­pects and ope­ra­te a con­trol­led bidder onboar­ding process—registration, KYC/AML and sanc­tions checks, and cre­dit­wort­hi­ness assessment—supporting pro­ce­du­ral inte­gri­ty and a defen­si­ble tran­sac­tion out­co­me.
  • Deb­tor Coope­ra­ti­on & Infor­ma­ti­on Access:
    For­mal request for the pro­vi­si­on of up-to-date docu­men­ta­ti­on to popu­la­te the vir­tu­al data room (VDR) in accordance with con­trac­tu­al coope­ra­ti­on obli­ga­ti­ons and appli­ca­ble covenants, ensu­ring trans­pa­ren­cy, pro­cess inte­gri­ty, and infor­med bidder par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on.
  • Online Live Auc­tion (Sec­tion 383 BGB n.F.):
    Legal­ly com­pli­ant live-stream auc­tion hos­ted on Ger­man ser­vers with low-laten­cy infra­struc­tu­re, pro­vi­ding docu­men­ted bid trans­pa­ren­cy, exe­cu­ti­on cer­tain­ty, and a defen­si­ble enforce­ment frame­work.
  • End-to-End Trans­pa­ren­cy:
    Clear time­line and pro­ceeds plan­ning within short exe­cu­ti­on win­dows; public noti­ce in accordance with Sec­tion 1237 BGB; regu­lar report­ing; a struc­tu­red, robust data room hos­ted on Ger­man ser­vers (VDR/NDA); and a com­pre­hen­si­ve, defen­si­ble docu­men­ta­ti­on trail through clo­sing.

Insti­tu­tio­nal Stan­dard of Pro­cess Gover­nan­ce

The publicly appoin­ted and sworn auc­tion­eer acts dili­gent­ly, duty-bound, neu­tral, and as an inde­pen­dent expert. The gover­ning stan­dard is a careful, mar­ket-con­sis­tent, trans­pa­rent, and ful­ly docu­men­ted pro­cess, safe­guar­ding the legi­ti­ma­te inte­rests of all stake­hol­ders. The auc­tion­eer is requi­red to con­duct the pro­ce­du­re on an arm’s‑length, non-dis­cri­mi­na­to­ry basis and must neither cau­se an evi­dent­ly immo­ral underva­lua­ti­on (Sec­tion 138 BGB) nor enga­ge in col­lu­si­ve con­duct or sys­te­ma­ti­cal­ly rest­rict bidder access. The start­ing bid, set on the basis of a plau­si­bi­li­ty assess­ment, ser­ves as a pro­ce­du­ral tool; the ham­mer pri­ce deter­mi­nes the mar­ket value.

Effi­ci­ent pro­ces­ses and inno­va­ti­ve solu­ti­ons

Opti­mi­zed and pro­ven pro­ces­ses deve­lo­ped by us gua­ran­tee effi­ci­ent and legal­ly com­pli­ant recy­cling — quick­ly and at short noti­ce.

We inte­gra­te AI into our pro­ces­ses.

We use legal­ly com­pli­ant, modern methods for online live auc­tions,

Vir­tu­al data room (NDA), ser­ver in Ger­ma­ny

Legal cer­tain­ty

The exclu­si­on of any war­ran­ty at the auc­tion pro­tects cre­di­tors from sub­se­quent claims.

Acqui­si­ti­on in good faith when sel­ling pled­ged pro­per­ty pro­vi­des secu­ri­ty against third-par­ty claims.

The value is irre­vo­ca­bly deter­mi­ned by a sove­reign act.

Legal­ly com­pli­ant pro­ces­sing in all pro­ce­du­ral steps.

Mar­ket exper­ti­se

Our exper­ti­se includes the ana­ly­sis of natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal mar­kets for rights, com­pa­ny shares, patents, trade­marks and objects of all kinds.

As export mer­chants, we cor­re­spond mul­ti­l­in­gual­ly via inter­na­tio­nal sales chan­nels.

As pro­ven experts in the field, we offer a good price/performance ratio.

Net­work and cus­to­mer base

We com­bi­ne tra­di­tio­nal print com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on with inno­va­ti­ve stra­te­gies that com­bi­ne video, audio and text for­mats to reach a broad natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal tar­get group.

Our exten­si­ve net­work, estab­lished cus­to­mer base for goods and rights of all kinds and inten­si­ve case-rela­ted rese­arch enable us to crea­te mar­kets for (new) pro­s­pec­ti­ve buy­ers at short noti­ce.

How we work with cre­di­tors

Our func­tion
We are not an enforce­ment body of the sta­te. As publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eers, we are part of the admi­nis­tra­ti­on of jus­ti­ce in col­la­te­ral enforce­ment. We help to sol­ve pro­blems. In doing so, we fol­low the com­mer­cial approach, becau­se the default on con­tracts almost always has com­mer­cial cau­ses. It is the­r­e­fo­re the most effec­ti­ve cour­se of action to sol­ve the pro­blem fair­ly. This results in the best pos­si­ble rea­liza­ti­on of claims for cre­di­tors and a reduc­tion in lia­bi­li­ties for deb­tors. We act inde­pendent­ly and impar­ti­al­ly. We are not a ser­vice pro­vi­der for the cre­di­tor, but an aut­ho­ri­ty sworn to inde­pen­dence in the rea­liza­ti­on pro­ce­du­re. We are cal­led in to pro­tect pro­per­ty rights, inclu­ding tho­se of the deb­tor, due to the sta­te pro­hi­bi­ting self-help.

Spe­cial exper­ti­se
Legis­la­ti­on sti­pu­la­tes that a publicly appoin­ted and sworn auc­tion­eer must have spe­cial exper­ti­se. This is unders­tood to mean abo­ve-avera­ge spe­cia­list know­ledge and exten­si­ve prac­ti­cal expe­ri­ence. An auc­tion­eer to be appoin­ted has sound legal and spe­cia­list know­ledge, many years of pro­fes­sio­nal expe­ri­ence and par­ti­cu­lar trust­wort­hi­ness and stands out from his pro­fes­sio­nal col­le­agues.

We com­bi­ne com­pre­hen­si­ve exper­ti­se with the hig­hest pro­fes­sio­nal qua­li­fi­ca­ti­ons to enforce liens in a tar­ge­ted and effi­ci­ent man­ner — with the aim of achie­ving eco­no­mic­al­ly opti­mal solu­ti­ons for both cre­di­tors and deb­tors in the short term. Our many years of expe­ri­ence enable us to pre­cis­e­ly ana­ly­ze natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal mar­kets and deve­lop opti­mal sales oppor­tu­ni­ties for rights such as com­pa­ny shares or patents and objects of all kinds in a tar­ge­ted man­ner. Depen­ding on the task at hand, we put tog­e­ther inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry teams from our net­work to deve­lop tail­or-made solu­ti­ons. Our aim is to help cre­di­tors to enforce their claims prompt­ly and at the same time help to redu­ce deb­tors’ lia­bi­li­ties.

What we stand for

Our pro­fes­si­on in Ger­ma­ny has its ori­g­ins in the days of the Han­sea­tic League, an era cha­rac­te­ri­zed by the fun­da­men­tal values of the Han­sea­tic mer­chant. The­se values — inte­gri­ty, relia­bi­li­ty and the pur­su­it of com­mer­cial solu­ti­ons — form the foun­da­ti­on of our cor­po­ra­te cul­tu­re. For the free Han­sea­tic mer­chant, it is a mat­ter of cour­se to sol­ve pro­blems by com­mer­cial means first. We are com­mit­ted to this tra­di­ti­on. It cha­rac­te­ri­zes not only the way we work as publicly appoin­ted and sworn auc­tion­eers, but also the part­ner­ship-based coope­ra­ti­on with our cli­ents.

Empa­thy
The rea­liza­ti­on of claims due to liens is often an unu­su­al and stressful situa­ti­on for cre­di­tors and deb­tors. For us, howe­ver, the rea­liza­ti­on of liens is part of our dai­ly prac­ti­ce. We do not see our­sel­ves as an enforce­ment body, but as a part­ner who respectful­ly con­siders the inte­rests of both sides.

We address the under­ly­ing pro­blems with empa­thy and deve­lop indi­vi­du­al, tail­or-made solu­ti­ons. Tole­rance and respect form the basis of our actions. By put­ting our­sel­ves in the shoes of ever­yo­ne invol­ved, we crea­te a frame­work in which demands can be balan­ced respon­si­bly and out­stan­ding lia­bi­li­ties can be redu­ced — always in a spi­rit of mutu­al app­re­cia­ti­on.

In some cases, we encoun­ter dif­fi­cult deb­tors who behave obs­truc­tively and irra­tio­nal­ly, often acting against their own inte­rests. Our many years of expe­ri­ence enable us to de-esca­la­te such situa­tions pro­fes­sio­nal­ly and bring com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on from an emo­tio­nal­ly aggres­si­ve to a fac­tu­al level.

In most cases, the legi­ti­ma­cy of the claims is bey­ond ques­ti­on. Nevert­hel­ess, attempts are often made to pre­vent the public auc­tion by loo­king for for­mal errors. Our top prio­ri­ty is the­r­e­fo­re com­ple­te and pre­cise com­pli­ance with all legal requi­re­ments.

Entre­pre­neu­ri­al spi­rit

We under­stand the chal­lenges of entre­pre­neu­ri­al acti­vi­ty and know what makes com­pa­nies suc­cessful. For us, being an entre­pre­neur also means taking respon­si­bi­li­ty — for decis­i­ons, solu­ti­ons and their con­se­quen­ces.
With this under­stan­ding, we deve­lop inno­va­ti­ve and sus­tainable stra­te­gies to enable cre­di­tors to rea­li­ze their claims quick­ly and effi­ci­ent­ly. Our approach com­bi­nes fore­sight with prag­ma­tism and aims to shape eco­no­mic inte­rests in a respon­si­ble and future-ori­en­ted man­ner.

Excel­lence

Excel­lence and inno­va­ti­on — for suc­cess at the hig­hest level: We stand for out­stan­ding results and set stan­dards for mea­sura­ble and sus­tainable suc­cess. Our com­mit­ment to excel­lence shapes ever­y­thing we do, from stra­te­gic plan­ning to working with cre­di­tors and deb­tors.
We always aim to achie­ve the best — through pre­cis­i­on, com­mit­ment and a con­sis­tent focus on the hig­hest stan­dards. For us, excel­lence is not just a cla­im, but our pro­mi­se.

If you are affec­ted by a cla­im.

The “one-size-fits-all” approach is often not expe­di­ent when rea­li­zing receiv­a­bles through con­trac­tu­al or sta­tu­to­ry liens. Each case requi­res an indi­vi­du­al approach and tail­or-made solu­ti­ons.

We would be plea­sed to offer you an initi­al, com­pli­men­ta­ry 30-minu­te con­sul­ta­ti­on to dis­cuss your mat­ter.
During this call, we will out­line the key legal pre­re­qui­si­tes of a public auc­tion, explain our sta­tu­to­ry role and func­tion, and invi­te you to brief­ly pre­sent the rele­vant facts of your case. Tog­e­ther we will ana­ly­ze your situa­ti­on and cla­ri­fy whe­ther a col­la­bo­ra­ti­on makes sen­se. Fol­lo­wing the dis­cus­sion, we will pro­vi­de you with a con­cise hand­out sum­ma­ri­zing the prin­ci­pal para­me­ters of the pro­cess, tog­e­ther with a descrip­ti­on of our ser­vices.

Would you like us to pro­po­se spe­ci­fic time slots for the initi­al call?

We look for­ward to hea­ring from you > cont­act us.

If the rea­liza­ti­on of col­la­te­ral
is time-cri­ti­cal and con­fi­den­ti­al:
Cont­act us.