Pled­ges of rights on shares: opti­mi­zed rea­liza­ti­on instru­ment in the rea­liza­ti­on of receiv­a­bles through the sale of shares

Pled­ges of rights for rea­liza­ti­on are an unde­re­sti­ma­ted instru­ment in the secu­ring and rea­liza­ti­on of receiv­a­bles.

Pled­ges of rights on busi­ness shares should have long been a stan­dard instru­ment of modern cre­dit pro­tec­tion — but their actu­al rea­liza­ti­on has so far remain­ed a rare­ly used opti­on. This para­dox is due less to legal or eco­no­mic obs­ta­cles than to a wide­spread stra­te­gic defi­cit in receiv­a­bles manage­ment and a wide­spread lack of know­ledge about the pos­si­bi­li­ties of using pled­ges of rights.

The tar­ge­ted rea­liza­ti­on of share liens offers an eco­no­mic­al­ly sen­si­ble and — with careful pre­pa­ra­ti­on — legal­ly secu­re alter­na­ti­ve to tra­di­tio­nal debt coll­ec­tion.

Ins­tead of losing them­sel­ves in pro­tra­c­ted legal action and sub­se­quent reco­very pro­cee­dings with an often uncer­tain out­co­me, secu­red cre­di­tors can gain direct influence over the debtor’s assets through a stra­te­gi­cal­ly plan­ned rea­liza­ti­on of GmbH shares or other busi­ness shares con­trac­tual­ly pled­ged to them. This opens up the pos­si­bi­li­ty of trans­fer­ring claims into com­pa­ny par­ti­ci­pa­ti­ons and rea­li­zing poten­ti­al for value app­re­cia­ti­on by actively sha­ping the busi­ness stra­tegy.

Cre­di­tors gene­ral­ly seek a com­pre­hen­si­ve insight into com­pa­ny tran­sac­tions and docu­ments. This makes it pos­si­ble to iden­ti­fy poten­ti­al grounds for lia­bi­li­ty for a per­so­nal cla­im against the pre­vious manage­ment. In many cases, the debtor’s direc­tors’ and offi­cers’ lia­bi­li­ty insu­rance can then be uti­li­zed or alter­na­ti­ve finan­cial resour­ces acti­va­ted.

Rea­liza­ti­on due to pledge of rights: legal­ly ancho­red, eco­no­mic­al­ly requi­red

Many com­pa­nies still rely on out­da­ted, resour­ce-inten­si­ve pro­ces­ses that thwart the actu­al pur­po­se — the quick and eco­no­mic­al rea­liza­ti­on of out­stan­ding receiv­a­bles.

While cre­di­tors and deb­tors labo­rious­ly wrest­le over pay­ment pro­mi­ses and fur­ther exten­si­ons, a far more direct and effec­ti­ve way often remains unu­sed — the tar­ge­ted rea­liza­ti­on of secu­red com­pa­ny shares. The rea­liza­ti­on of share liens offers a con­vin­cing alter­na­ti­ve to tra­di­tio­nal receiv­a­bles manage­ment: an eco­no­mic­al­ly sen­si­ble, legal­ly secu­re and plan­nable way of trans­forming receiv­a­bles into valuable com­pa­ny shares.

Why is this opti­on often not reco­gni­zed? The ans­wer lies in a com­bi­na­ti­on of uncer­tain­ty, pos­si­ble lack of pre­ce­dent, stra­te­gic iner­tia and igno­rance. Many cre­di­tors unde­re­sti­ma­te the enforcea­bi­li­ty of share liens and shy away from actively influen­cing the deb­tor. Yet the legal frame­work has long been estab­lished — and pro­fes­sio­nal auc­tions by publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eers have pro­ven their worth.

With the amend­ment of Sec­tion 383 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB) as of 01.01.2025, the legis­la­tor has not only mani­fes­ted the publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer as the cen­tral aut­ho­ri­ty for col­la­te­ral enforce­ment, but has also crea­ted the basis for a signi­fi­cant expan­si­on of the mar­ket. The pos­si­bi­li­ty of expan­ding the cir­cle of poten­ti­al purcha­sers in a tar­ge­ted man­ner leads direct­ly to hig­her rea­liza­ti­on pro­ceeds — an effect that infor­med cre­di­tors should use stra­te­gi­cal­ly.

Mar­ket dyna­mics through online live auc­tions

The per­sis­tent pre­con­cep­ti­on that public auc­tions ine­vi­ta­b­ly lead to sell-off pri­ces is pri­ma­ri­ly the result of out­da­ted ide­as of local face-to-face auc­tions with a limi­t­ed num­ber of par­ti­ci­pan­ts. The rea­li­ty has long sin­ce chan­ged: Vir­tu­al live public auc­tions take mar­ket dyna­mics to a who­le new level by enab­ling broa­der natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal bid­ding com­pe­ti­ti­on and thus achie­ving signi­fi­cant­ly bet­ter liqui­da­ti­on results. Anyo­ne who over­looks this is was­ting eco­no­mic poten­ti­al.

Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tung — Spe­cia­list for auc­tions of com­pa­ny shares

A key play­er in this area is Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tung Oster­may­er & Dr. Gold GbR, which spe­cia­li­zes in the pro­fes­sio­nal liqui­da­ti­on of com­pa­ny shares. Through trans­pa­rent, GDPR-com­pli­ant online auc­tions (live online auc­tion), it ensu­res that the shares are sold at fair mar­ket pri­ces and that cre­di­tors achie­ve an eco­no­mic­al­ly via­ble rea­liza­ti­on of their col­la­te­ral. Its many years of expe­ri­ence and broad net­work of poten­ti­al buy­ers make Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tung a relia­ble part­ner for the struc­tu­red and legal­ly com­pli­ant liqui­da­ti­on of GmbH shares.

This artic­le out­lines the cen­tral advan­ta­ges of col­la­te­ral enforce­ment, cle­ars up com­mon mis­con­cep­ti­ons and shows why the rea­liza­ti­on of GmbH shares or other rights should not be a last resort, but a stra­te­gi­cal­ly sen­si­ble opti­on for secu­red cre­di­tors. If you hold pled­ges of rights, you should use them — any­thing else is was­ted poten­ti­al.

Using pled­ges of rights stra­te­gi­cal­ly — effi­ci­ent rea­liza­ti­on ins­tead of loss of value

The aim is to be at the fore­front of non-per­forming loan com­mit­ments and to bring about a rapid solu­ti­on through a legal­ly com­pli­ant pro­ce­du­re.

Trust may be good, but con­trol is bet­ter. Tho­se who actively mana­ge their inte­rests not only secu­re a stra­te­gic advan­ta­ge, but also pre­vent unex­pec­ted los­ses. Take advan­ta­ge of oppor­tu­ni­ties — by swit­ching sides.

Expan­ding room for maneu­ver — tar­ge­ted uti­liza­ti­on of col­la­te­ral

The rea­liza­ti­on of con­trac­tual­ly agreed pled­ges of rights offers far-rea­ching oppor­tu­ni­ties to switch from a pas­si­ve cre­di­tor posi­ti­on to an acti­ve owner­ship role. The con­ver­si­on of receiv­a­bles into par­ti­ci­pa­ti­ons(debt-to-equi­ty) or assets(debt-to-asset) repres­ents an effec­ti­ve alter­na­ti­ve to the sale of non-per­forming loans(NPL) or leng­thy and cost-inten­si­ve M&A pro­ces­ses.

Your oppor­tu­ni­ty:
Sha­ping ins­tead of hesi­ta­ting — tho­se who show initia­ti­ve beco­me acti­ve owners and secu­re their eco­no­mic scope for action.

Your advan­ta­ges of col­la­te­ral rea­liza­ti­on by the publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer

The use of a public auc­tion enables the hig­hest pri­ces to be achie­ved through trans­pa­rent bid­ding com­pe­ti­ti­on, wher­eby set­backs in the event of insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings can be avo­ided by acting in good time. In addi­ti­on, the appli­ca­ti­on of Sec­tion 166 (1) InsO does not app­ly to pled­ged com­pa­ny shares and other rights, as the BGH ruling of 27.10.2022 (IX ZR 145/21) shows.

An expert opi­ni­on is not requi­red, and the public auc­tion rules out a rescis­si­on of the purcha­se con­tract, as the acqui­si­ti­on is made by vir­tue of an act of sta­te. In addi­ti­on, Sec­tion 935 (2) BGB gua­ran­tees acqui­si­ti­on in good faith.

Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tung spe­cia­li­zes in non-per­forming loan expo­sures

As publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eers, we are equip­ped with sove­reign rights to rea­li­ze con­trac­tual­ly agreed pled­ges of rights in accordance with the law. Our exper­ti­se includes the rea­liza­ti­on of com­pa­ny shares as well as secu­ri­ties, trade­mark rights, domains and patents wit­hout the need for time-con­sum­ing and cost-inten­si­ve dun­ning or legal pro­cee­dings.

We are part of a net­work of high­ly spe­cia­li­zed lawy­ers and tax advi­sors who ensu­re legal­ly com­pli­ant and eco­no­mic­al­ly opti­mi­zed rea­liza­ti­on. Exis­ting con­tracts can be quick­ly adapt­ed to indi­vi­du­al requi­re­ments, while tax-opti­mi­zed auc­tion designs are used for share deals. Based on our many years of expe­ri­ence, we can recom­mend spe­cia­list lawy­ers for the draf­ting of tried and tes­ted pledge agree­ments.

Our access to natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal pro­s­pec­ti­ve buy­ers, inclu­ding ven­ture capi­ta­lists, enables us to achie­ve the hig­hest auc­tion pro­ceeds. Our tech­ni­cal­ly pro­ven infra­struc­tu­re enables legal­ly com­pli­ant online live auc­tions with live strea­ming, ensu­ring maxi­mum bid­ding com­pe­ti­ti­on. The legal­ly regu­la­ted public auc­tion mini­mi­zes lia­bi­li­ty risks for all par­ti­ci­pan­ts.

Con­clu­si­on for len­ders with non-per­forming loans

Plan­ning secu­ri­ty for receiv­a­bles is cru­cial through for­ward-loo­king con­trac­tu­al arran­ge­ments in advan­ce. Mista­kes can be avo­ided if action is taken in good time. Col­la­te­ral pro­vi­si­on and con­trol can be opti­mi­zed through indi­vi­du­al­ly defi­ned opti­ons for action.

Note from the uti­liza­ti­on prac­ti­ce (no legal advice):

Can a pledge of rights be trans­fer­red? — Legal clas­si­fi­ca­ti­on for the sale of NPLs

Pled­ges of rights are gene­ral­ly trans­fera­ble — but almost never in iso­la­ti­on. As a rule, they are acces­so­ry, i.e. inse­pa­ra­b­ly lin­ked to the secu­red cla­im. If such a cla­im is sold or auc­tion­ed as part of an NPL pro­cess, for exam­p­le, the pledge of rights is auto­ma­ti­cal­ly trans­fer­red (Sec­tion 401 BGB). This appli­es in par­ti­cu­lar to sta­tu­to­ry pled­ges of rights such as the for­war­ding or warehouse lien (Sec­tions 464, 475 HGB), but also to mor­tga­ges or con­trac­tual­ly agreed col­la­te­ral.

The Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tung enables the legal­ly com­pli­ant trans­fer of a cla­im and an exis­ting pledge of rights to a new purcha­ser at a public auc­tion. The pre­re­qui­si­te is that the cla­im is assi­gnable and the pledge of rights has effec­tively ari­sen — for exam­p­le through pos­ses­si­on, regis­tra­ti­on or a pledge agree­ment — and that the trans­fer of all rights takes place in a for­mal­ly effec­ti­ve man­ner.

The pledge of rights the­r­e­fo­re fol­lows the cla­im. This gives cre­di­tors and purcha­sers clear, eco­no­mic­al­ly via­ble scope for action — even in com­plex liqui­da­ti­on situa­tions.

Excur­sus: What is the dif­fe­rence bet­ween acces­so­ry and non-acces­so­ry col­la­te­ral?

Acces­so­ry col­la­te­ral (e.g. pledge of rights) only exists tog­e­ther with a cla­im. They cea­se to exist when the cla­im expi­res and are auto­ma­ti­cal­ly trans­fer­red with the assign­ment. Non-acces­so­ry col­la­te­ral such as a land char­ge or trans­fer of owner­ship by way of secu­ri­ty, on the other hand, is legal­ly inde­pen­dent and can also be trans­fer­red or remain in exis­tence wit­hout a cla­im. In prac­ti­ce, this distinc­tion is important for rea­liza­ti­on and trans­fera­bi­li­ty in the con­text of NPL tran­sac­tions.

Cont­act us — tog­e­ther for a suc­cessful result!

Fur­ther artic­les on the topic

Pledge of rights: sei­ze oppor­tu­ni­ties, avo­id mista­kes! Cre­di­tors can expand their scope of action by pled­ging and legal­ly com­pli­ant rea­liza­ti­on of con­trac­tual­ly agreed pled­ges of rights to com­pa­ny shares.

Auc­tio­ning com­pa­ny shares in the real estate sec­tor: the effec­ti­ve stra­tegy for mez­za­ni­ne finan­ciers in shaky pro­ject com­pa­nies

Dan­ger with the nota­ry? Auc­tion of com­pa­ny shares by the nota­ry: What cli­ents need to know.

Pledge of rights — ever­y­thing you need to know explai­ned. A pledge of rights can rela­te to things, i.e. phy­si­cal objects, as well as to rights of any kind, such as com­pa­ny shares, patents, secu­ri­ties, IP rights, domains, licen­ses or trade­mark rights.

Pledge of rights to shares and their rea­liza­ti­on in pledge auc­tions Auc­tions as online auc­tions Online auc­tion Lien rea­liza­ti­on Public auc­tion by publicly appoin­ted sworn auc­tion­eer Auc­tion­eer

Share post:

Facebook
X
LinkedIn

Further contributions: