Pledge of rights of for­war­ders, warehouse kee­pers, car­ri­ers, ship­pers

Infor­ma­ti­on on the pledge of rights of for­war­ders, warehouse kee­pers, car­ri­ers and ship­pers

Effi­ci­ent rea­liza­ti­on of receiv­a­bles through legal rea­liza­ti­on

Legal col­la­te­ral enforce­ment is the most eco­no­mic­al­ly and legal­ly advan­ta­ge­ous method of enfor­cing claims. For­war­ders, warehouse kee­pers, car­ri­ers and ship­pers are pri­vi­le­ged under the Ger­man Com­mer­cial Code (HGB) and the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB): They are entit­led by law to a right of lien and rea­liza­ti­on on the debtor’s goods in their pos­ses­si­on (Sec­tions 464, 475b, 495, 440 HGB). Our com­pre­hen­si­ve mar­ket exper­ti­se and our exten­si­ve net­work of natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal buy­ers ensu­re opti­mum rea­liza­ti­on pro­ceeds — far in excess of what is usual­ly achie­ved by bai­liffs or insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tors.

Insol­ven­cy and liqui­da­ti­on: cre­di­tors’ rights

Insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tors often urge logi­stics com­pa­nies to include pled­ged items in the liqui­da­ti­on of assets — often via their own liqui­da­ti­on com­pa­nies. Howe­ver, they are obli­ged to inform the cre­di­tor in accordance with § Sec­tion 168 InsO about the time, place and pri­ce of the sale. The cre­di­tor can pro­po­se a more advan­ta­ge­ous rea­liza­ti­on within one week, for exam­p­le through a publicly appoin­ted auc­tion­eer.

While publicly appoin­ted auc­tion­eers are obli­ged to make the best pos­si­ble sale, insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tors can sell by pri­va­te trea­ty and in a non-trans­pa­rent man­ner — often to the detri­ment of cre­di­tors.

For lia­bi­li­ty reasons, mana­ging direc­tors are obli­ged to avert eco­no­mic dama­ge to the com­pa­ny and to secu­re the most finan­ci­al­ly advan­ta­ge­ous solu­ti­on. They may not accept pri­va­te purcha­se offers at unre­ason­ab­ly low pri­ces.

Advan­ta­ges of the public auc­tion

Sta­tu­to­ry col­la­te­ral enforce­ment eli­mi­na­tes the time and cos­ts of court dun­ning pro­cee­dings. The cre­di­tor saves:

  • Legal and court cos­ts
  • Wai­ting times and enforce­ment cos­ts
  • Advan­ces to the court cas­hier and bai­liff
  • Own work and time expen­dit­u­re

Legal advice can be useful, but is not essen­ti­al.

Direct uti­liza­ti­on accor­ding to old ADSP (until 2015)

The ADSPs in force until 2015 allo­wed for pri­va­te sale, but ent­ail­ed con­sidera­ble risks:

  • Unclear mar­ket pri­ce: No pro­ven value → Poten­ti­al for dis­pu­te
  • Sales tax lia­bi­li­ty: Sales pro­ceeds were sub­ject to sales tax
  • No acqui­si­ti­on in good faith: buy­ers could not acqui­re owner­ship in accordance with Sec­tion 935 (2) BGB
  • Lia­bi­li­ty risks: War­ran­ty claims were not excluded
  • Delays: Judi­cial review of equi­ta­ble devia­ti­ons (§ 1246 BGB)

For this reason, the ADSP, which has been in force sin­ce 2015, once again recom­mends sta­tu­to­ry col­la­te­ral enforce­ment in accordance with the HGB and BGB.

Insol­ven­cy risks: Con­te­sta­ti­on and risk of dama­ges

Liqui­da­ti­on on the open mar­ket ent­ails con­sidera­ble risks in the event of insol­ven­cy:

  • Con­te­sta­ti­on by insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor for mass reco­very
  • Con­test­ing the appro­pria­ten­ess of the pro­ceeds → Claims for dama­ges
  • Lack of mar­ket value docu­men­ta­ti­on → Lia­bi­li­ty risks for logi­stics pro­vi­ders

Alter­na­ti­ve: Auc­tion in accordance with § 825 ZPO

A publicly appoin­ted auc­tion­eer can also act in place of the bai­liff in the case of enforceable claims. Advan­ta­ges:

  • Fas­ter pro­ces­sing: bai­liffs are often over­loa­ded
  • Hig­her reve­nues: Broad net­work of buy­ers — natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal
  • Effi­ci­en­cy for the cre­di­tor: fas­ter liqui­da­ti­on redu­ces los­ses

Fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on: Blog post “Ship­ping lien law — so that the cri­sis does not beco­me a cata­stro­phe”.

We car­ry out:

(1) If a mer­chant sells or pled­ges a mova­ble pro­per­ty not belon­ging to him in the cour­se of his busi­ness, the pro­vi­si­ons of the Civil Code shall app­ly in favor of tho­se who deri­ve rights from a non-entit­led per­son even if the good faith of the acqui­rer con­cerns the aut­ho­ri­ty of the sel­ler or pled­gor to dis­po­se of the pro­per­ty on behalf of the owner.

(2) If the object is encum­be­red with the rights of a third par­ty, the pro­vi­si­ons of the Civil Code shall app­ly in favor of tho­se who deri­ve rights from a non-entit­led par­ty even if the good faith con­cerns the aut­ho­ri­ty of the sel­ler or pled­gor to dis­po­se of the object wit­hout reser­va­ti­on of the right.

(3) The sta­tu­to­ry pledge of rights of the com­mis­si­on agent, the car­ri­er or ship­per, the for­war­der and the warehouse kee­per shall be equi­va­lent to a pledge of rights acqui­red by con­tract in accordance with para­graph 1 with regard to the pro­tec­tion of good faith. Howe­ver, sen­tence 1 shall not app­ly to the sta­tu­to­ry pledge of rights to goods which are not the sub­ject of the con­tract from which the cla­im to be secu­red by the pledge ari­ses.

Accor­ding to § 446 HGB, the freight for­war­der has a legal pledge of rights to the goods, inclu­ding freight, com­mis­si­on, expen­ses and use. The pre­re­qui­si­te for this is that he is in pos­ses­si­on of the goods, in par­ti­cu­lar that he can dis­po­se of them by means of bills of lading, con­sign­ment bills or warehouse receipts.

(Cf. Marx/Arens: Der Auk­tio­na­tor, 2004, p. 274)

Accor­ding to § 475 b HGB, the warehouse kee­per has a legal pledge of rights to the goods due to the sto­rage cos­ts. The pre­re­qui­si­te for this is that he is in pos­ses­si­on of the goods, in par­ti­cu­lar that he can dis­po­se of them by means of bills of lading, con­sign­ment bills or warehouse receipts (see Marx/Arens Der Auk­tio­na­tor, 2004, p. 274).

Detail­ed infor­ma­ti­on on the sub­ject of warehouse liens can be found on our web­site spe­ci­fi­cal­ly for freight for­war­ders and warehouse kee­pers: www.speditionspfandrechtsversteigerung.de

(Web­site curr­ent­ly under con­s­truc­tion) — Cont­act for ques­ti­ons: Tel. 0827 908 9928.

Accor­ding to § 440 HGB, the car­ri­er has a sta­tu­to­ry lien on the car­go for all claims ari­sing from the con­tract of car­ria­ge and cus­toms duties as well as accor­ding to §§ 26 and 27 BinSchG in con­junc­tion with § 440 HGB. § 440 HGB a sta­tu­to­ry pledge of rights. The pre­re­qui­si­te for this is that he is in pos­ses­si­on of the goods, in par­ti­cu­lar that he can dis­po­se of them by means of bills of lading, con­sign­ment bills or warehouse receipts (see Marx/Arens Der Auk­tio­na­tor, 2004, p. 274).

Detail­ed infor­ma­ti­on on the sub­ject of warehouse liens can be found on our spe­cia­list web­site: www.speditionspfandrechtsversteigerung.de

(Web­site curr­ent­ly under con­s­truc­tion) — Cont­act for ques­ti­ons: Tel. 0827 908 9928.

If the realization of collateral
is time-critical and confidential:
Contact us.