Pledge of rights land­lord / les­sor

Pledge of rights of the land­lord and les­sor

Used in a tar­ge­ted man­ner, sta­tu­to­ry pled­ges of rights offer the real estate indus­try a quick, cost-effi­ci­ent and legal­ly secu­re solu­ti­on:

  • in the event of the ten­an­t’s death,
  • for non-per­forming ren­tal agree­ments,
  • for the short-term cle­arance of blo­cked ren­tal pro­per­ties,
  • for the effec­ti­ve rea­liza­ti­on of receiv­a­bles.

Our com­pre­hen­si­ve mar­ket exper­ti­se and our exten­si­ve net­work of natio­nal and inter­na­tio­nal buy­ers ensu­re opti­mum rea­liza­ti­on pro­ceeds — far in excess of what is usual­ly achie­ved by bai­liffs or insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tors.

Insol­ven­cy and liqui­da­ti­on: cre­di­tors’ rights

Insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tors often urge land­lords or les­sors to include pled­ged items in the liqui­da­ti­on of assets — often via their own liqui­da­ti­on com­pa­nies. In doing so, they are obli­ged to inform the cre­di­tor in accordance with § Sec­tion 168 InsO about the time, place and pri­ce of the sale. The cre­di­tor can pro­po­se a more advan­ta­ge­ous rea­liza­ti­on within one week, for exam­p­le through a publicly appoin­ted auc­tion­eer.

While publicly appoin­ted auc­tion­eers are obli­ged to make the best pos­si­ble sale, insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tors can sell by pri­va­te trea­ty and in a non-trans­pa­rent man­ner — often to the detri­ment of cre­di­tors.

For lia­bi­li­ty reasons, mana­ging direc­tors are obli­ged to avert eco­no­mic dama­ge to the com­pa­ny and to secu­re the most finan­ci­al­ly advan­ta­ge­ous solu­ti­on. They may not accept pri­va­te purcha­se offers at unre­ason­ab­ly low pri­ces.

We car­ry out:

Ten­ant does not vaca­te?

Are you at the end of your tether becau­se your pro­per­ties are blo­cked due to the ten­an­t’s ina­bi­li­ty to pay, death or insol­ven­cy? As a com­mer­cial land­lord, are you won­de­ring why, in the event of insol­ven­cy, a lar­ge pro­por­ti­on of your ren­tal claims are used up by the expen­si­ve pro­cee­dings?

We enable simp­le solu­ti­ons for the real estate indus­try
legal­ly com­pli­ant and cost-effec­ti­ve

on the basis of § 562 BGB, in the case of rent deb­tors, in the event of insol­ven­cy and in the event of the death of ten­ants.

For many years, we have been con­duc­ting public land­lord lien auc­tions accor­ding to the so-cal­led “Ber­lin model”. We pro­vi­de a legal­ly secu­re alter­na­ti­ve to expen­si­ve evic­tions by bai­liffs and their appoin­ted agents.

With the amend­ment of ten­an­cy law, the tried-and-tes­ted “Ber­lin evic­tion” model was incor­po­ra­ted into the law in Sec­tion 885a of the Ger­man Code of Civil Pro­ce­du­re (ZPO). Despi­te years of resis­tance, our legal opi­ni­on has now found its legal basis.

Your advan­ta­ges

  1. We enable prompt and con­sider­a­b­ly more cost-effec­ti­ve cle­arance than the usu­al bai­liff-com­mis­sio­ned for­war­ding agen­cy
  2. On request, we can con­duct the auc­tion in the ren­tal pro­per­ty
  3. Our fees are almost exclu­si­ve­ly based on the pre­mi­um that we recei­ve from the buy­er. In this way, you avo­id the bai­lif­f’s fees.
  4. In the case of com­mer­cial ten­an­ci­es, not all is lost even in the event of insol­ven­cy. We know how to achie­ve the best pos­si­ble rea­liza­ti­on result for you vis-à-vis the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor.

Lea­se deb­tor does not vaca­te?

Are you at the end of your tether becau­se your pro­per­ties are blo­cked due to the ten­an­t’s ina­bi­li­ty to pay, death or insol­ven­cy? As a com­mer­cial land­lord, are you won­de­ring why, in the event of insol­ven­cy, a lar­ge pro­por­ti­on of your rent claims are used up by the expen­si­ve pro­cee­dings?

We enable simp­le solu­ti­ons for the real estate indus­try:
legal­ly com­pli­ant and cost-effec­ti­ve

on the basis of § 592 BGB, for ten­ants, in the event of insol­ven­cy and in the event of the death of ten­ants

For many years, we have been car­ry­ing out public land­lord and ten­ant lien auc­tions in accordance with the so-cal­led “Ber­lin evic­tion”. We pro­vi­de a legal­ly secu­re alter­na­ti­ve to expen­si­ve evic­tions by bai­liffs and their appoin­ted for­war­ding agents.

Your advan­ta­ges

  1. We enable prompt and con­sider­a­b­ly more cost-effec­ti­ve cle­arance than the for­war­ding agen­cy usual­ly com­mis­sio­ned by the bai­liffs
  2. On request, we can con­duct the auc­tion at the lea­sed pro­per­ty
  3. Our remu­ne­ra­ti­on is based on the pre­mi­um we recei­ve from the buy­er.
  4. In the case of com­mer­cial ten­an­ci­es, not all is lost even in the event of insol­ven­cy. We know how to achie­ve an opti­mal rea­liza­ti­on result for you vis-à-vis the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor.

With the amend­ment of ten­an­cy law, the tried-and-tes­ted “Ber­lin evic­tion” model was incor­po­ra­ted into the law in Sec­tion 885a of the Ger­man Code of Civil Pro­ce­du­re (ZPO). Despi­te years of resis­tance, our legal opi­ni­on final­ly found its legal basis. The advan­ta­ge for land­lords: Com­pared to the so-cal­led Prus­si­an evic­tion, it can be cle­ared con­sider­a­b­ly more cost-effec­tively.

The bai­liff arran­ges for a key ser­vice com­mis­sio­ned by him to gain access, asks the ten­ant to lea­ve the pro­per­ty and puts the owner back in pos­ses­si­on of his pro­per­ty. He docu­ments the items left behind by the ten­ant. This is done by means of pho­to­gra­phic docu­men­ta­ti­on.
The bai­liff demands an advan­ce pay­ment for locks­mit­hs and pho­to­graph­ers.

In some loca­ti­ons in Ger­ma­ny, we can help land­lords to redu­ce cos­ts at this point. The locks­mit­hs we recom­mend are usual­ly che­a­per. Pho­to docu­men­ta­ti­on can also usual­ly be car­ri­ed out more cost-effec­tively by our uti­liza­ti­on con­sul­tants. It is one of their dai­ly tasks to car­ry out invent­ories with pho­to docu­men­ta­ti­on pro­fes­sio­nal­ly.

It is important to note that in accordance with Sec­tion 885 a ZPO, the pro­per­ty is rea­li­zed due to default of accep­tance. This means that no claims can be made by third par­ties due to reten­ti­on of title.

Dis­po­sal: Accor­ding to § 885 a ZPO , obvious­ly wort­hl­ess items can be dis­po­sed of by the land­lord. Alt­hough it is the bai­lif­f’s task to docu­ment the inven­to­ry found, he will not make any state­ment on the value of the inven­to­ry for reasons of offi­ci­al lia­bi­li­ty.

As a lea­ding ser­vice pro­vi­der in the field of lien rea­liza­ti­on, we have been car­ry­ing out land­lord lien rea­liza­ti­ons accor­ding to the so-cal­led Ber­lin model (also known as Ber­lin evic­tion) for many years. We help land­lords to clear their ren­ted pro­per­ties — espe­ci­al­ly in com­pa­ri­son to the tra­di­tio­nal pro­cess car­ri­ed out by the bai­liff in con­junc­tion with cle­arance by a for­war­ding agent com­mis­sio­ned by the bai­liff — at short noti­ce, with legal cer­tain­ty and at low cost. The use of § 885 a ZPO is the­r­e­fo­re the opti­mal solu­ti­on to the pro­blem of clea­ring blo­cked pro­per­ties.

If the realization of collateral
is time-critical and confidential:
Contact us.