Opti­ons for hedging receiv­a­bles — plan­ning secu­ri­ty in advan­ce thanks to the dou­ble fidu­cia­ry model

Dou­ble fidu­cia­ry model — secu­re con­trol, enable uti­liza­ti­on

The dual trus­tee model is a stra­te­gic instru­ment that has pro­ven its­elf in prac­ti­ce when cre­di­tors want to secu­re con­trol over com­pa­ny shares or rights and at the same time prepa­re the eco­no­mic rea­liza­ti­on effi­ci­ent­ly, wit­hout blo­cka­des and in com­pli­ance with the law.
We show why this model offers real advan­ta­ges, par­ti­cu­lar­ly in cri­sis situa­tions — such as pro­tec­tion against third-par­ty access, the abili­ty to act despi­te con­flicts and dis­cre­ti­on in imple­men­ta­ti­on.

In many uti­liza­ti­on situa­tions, a simp­le secu­ri­ty struc­tu­re is not suf­fi­ci­ent.

Espe­ci­al­ly not if a com­pa­ny is to be saved from insol­ven­cy, a GmbH share is to be rea­li­zed in accordance with the law or a com­plex cre­di­tor inte­rest is to be safe­guard­ed.

It is pre­cis­e­ly in such cases that we rely on the dual fidu­cia­ry model in prac­ti­ce — a fle­xi­ble yet high­ly effec­ti­ve instru­ment that ensu­res con­trol and crea­tes lee­way.

What is the dou­ble fidu­cia­ry model?

Essen­ti­al­ly, this invol­ves two coor­di­na­ted fidu­cia­ry rela­ti­onships:

- The inner trus­tee is the for­mal owner of the assets — for exam­p­le, the regis­tered share­hol­der of a limi­t­ed lia­bi­li­ty com­pa­ny or the owner of an IP right.

- The outer trus­tee con­trols the inner trus­tee — typi­cal­ly on behalf of one or more cre­di­tors or as part of a res­truc­tu­ring or liqui­da­ti­on con­cept.

In this way, the assets remain legal­ly pro­tec­ted — and at the same time eco­no­mic­al­ly con­troll­able.

In prac­ti­ce, the model is often imple­men­ted by lawy­ers, res­truc­tu­ring con­sul­tants or eco­no­mic­al­ly neu­tral trust com­pa­nies — espe­ci­al­ly when it comes to con­flict-laden share­hol­dings or secu­red rea­liza­ti­ons.

Why should you use this model?

The dual fidu­cia­ry model is not a theo­re­ti­cal con­s­truct — it sol­ves real pro­blems when it mat­ters.

Here are the six most important bene­fits from recy­cling prac­ti­ce:

1. ensu­re con­trol — wit­hout per­so­nal lia­bi­li­ty

Cre­di­tors recei­ve de fac­to power of dis­po­sal over shares, rights or claims — wit­hout them­sel­ves acting as share­hol­ders or incur­ring per­so­nal lia­bi­li­ty.

2. secu­ri­ty through legal con­for­mi­ty in uti­liza­ti­on

The model allows GmbH shares, IP rights or receiv­a­bles to be rea­li­zed in a legal­ly com­pli­ant man­ner — even in the case of blo­cked share­hol­der struc­tures or situa­tions clo­se to insol­ven­cy. The rea­liza­ti­on can be car­ri­ed out by a publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer — on behalf of the trus­tee.

3. pro­tec­tion against indi­vi­du­al enforce­ment

Once secu­red in trust, the assets are pro­tec­ted from uncoor­di­na­ted indi­vi­du­al access by other cre­di­tors. The liqui­da­ti­on is struc­tu­red — in the inte­rests of all par­ties invol­ved.

4. fle­xi­bi­li­ty in res­truc­tu­ring and M&A

The model can be com­bi­ned with debt-to-equi­ty swaps, pre­pa­ra­to­ry mea­su­res for a com­pa­ny sale or inves­tor solu­ti­ons. The exter­nal trus­tee can deci­de at any time — wit­hout being blo­cked by out­side share­hol­ders.

5. dis­cre­ti­on and free­dom of nego­tia­ti­on

The bene­fi­ci­al owner does not appear extern­al­ly. This crea­tes room for nego­tia­ti­on — for exam­p­le in res­truc­tu­ring, inves­tor dis­cus­sions or distres­sed M&A.

6. asser­ting cre­di­tor inte­rests — even in dif­fi­cult situa­tions

Par­ti­cu­lar­ly in the case of com­pa­ny shares, rights or com­plex cre­di­tor pools, the dou­ble fidu­cia­ry model can be the basis for a rea­liza­ti­on of value at all.

A con­cre­te exam­p­le

A cre­di­tor has a con­trac­tu­al pledge of rights to the shares of a GmbH.

The aim is short-term rea­liza­ti­on — wit­hout the debtor’s con­sent.

The shares are trans­fer­red to an inter­nal trus­tee — this is ente­red in the com­mer­cial regis­ter.

At the same time, an exter­nal, neu­tral trus­tee is given the right to issue ins­truc­tions and the liqui­da­ti­on man­da­te.

In the next step, a publicly appoin­ted auc­tion­eer is com­mis­sio­ned — for exam­p­le for an auc­tion in accordance with § 23 GmbHG.

The auc­tion is trans­pa­rent and legal­ly com­pli­ant — and the pro­ceeds are used to repay the secu­red cla­im.

The enti­re pro­cess remains con­troll­able, unblo­cked and eco­no­mic­al­ly via­ble.

Our con­clu­si­on

The dual fidu­cia­ry model enables eco­no­mic con­trol with full legal pro­tec­tion.

It ensu­res the rea­liza­bi­li­ty of com­pa­ny shares, rights and assets — even in dif­fi­cult and blo­cked con­stel­la­ti­ons.

And it crea­tes a clear basis for public auc­tions — as an order­ly and trans­pa­rent form of uti­liza­ti­on.

If you are con­fron­ted with a non-per­forming invest­ment or a share to be liqui­da­ted: Talk to your legal advi­sor or an expe­ri­en­ced trus­tee at an ear­ly stage.

Com­pared to other designs, the pro­cess can be imple­men­ted quick­ly and cost-effec­tively.

As publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eers, we are hap­py to sup­port you in the rea­liza­ti­on of the sale — dis­creet­ly, effi­ci­ent­ly and in com­pli­ance with the law.

> We look for­ward to hea­ring from you! To the cont­act form.

Pic­tu­re cre­dits: Pho­to­grapher kelvn_photo, enva­to ele­ments Y57LZ9TKAN

Share post:

Facebook
X
LinkedIn

Further contributions: