Land­lord lien auc­tion, Ber­lin evic­tion: Fre­quent­ly asked ques­ti­ons and indi­vi­du­al advice

We are hap­py to offer you indi­vi­du­al advice.

Qua­li­fied advice on the imple­men­ta­ti­on of lien rea­liza­ti­on is based on many years of prac­ti­cal expe­ri­ence and legal requi­re­ments as well as exten­si­ve know-how in various sub­ject are­as and pro­duct clas­ses.

Advice on indi­vi­du­al cases is usual­ly time-con­sum­ing. We ask for your under­stan­ding that we can­not pro­vi­de such advice free of char­ge.

If you would like an indi­vi­du­al tele­pho­ne con­sul­ta­ti­on, plea­se send us the order form with your signa­tu­re by fax or e‑mail.

We char­ge 300 euros plus VAT per hour of work or part the­reof. The amount will be cre­di­ted when a reco­very order is pla­ced. We will call you short­ly after your bank trans­fer to car­ry out the con­sul­ta­ti­on.

Land­lor­d’s lien and Ber­lin evic­tion.

We have pro­vi­ded ans­wers to the most fre­quent­ly asked prac­ti­cal ques­ti­ons below. We the­r­e­fo­re ask you to first fami­lia­ri­ze yours­elf with this infor­ma­ti­on here. Plea­se also refer to the web­site on the sub­ject of “Ber­lin evic­tion”:

The decis­i­on of the Fede­ral Court of Jus­ti­ce of 17.11.2005 (AZ I ZB 45/05 — known as the “Ber­lin model” — ope­ned up a favorable alter­na­ti­ve for land­lords to the pre­vious cost-inten­si­ve “Prus­si­an evic­tion”. Sin­ce 01.05.2013, the “Ber­lin evic­tion” has been enshri­ned in law via Sec­tion 885 a ZPO. Through the invol­vement of a publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer, the evic­tion of com­mer­cial and pri­va­te resi­den­ti­al lea­ses is now signi­fi­cant­ly more cost-effec­ti­ve.

The gene­ral­ly publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer is ent­rus­ted with car­ry­ing out the sove­reign act of rea­li­zing the lien. The auc­tion­eer is to be unders­tood as part of the legal sys­tem that can be cal­led in to car­ry out this task. The work of the auc­tion­eer con­tri­bu­tes both to the rea­liza­ti­on of the cre­di­tor’s cla­im and to the best pos­si­ble reduc­tion of the rent debtor’s lia­bi­li­ties. This also makes a social con­tri­bu­ti­on.

Com­pared to con­ven­tio­nal cle­arance by a bai­liff, the finan­cial out­lay for a Ber­lin cle­arance is signi­fi­cant­ly lower. This is becau­se the­re are no con­sidera­ble cos­ts that the bai­liff esti­ma­tes for coll­ec­tion and sto­rage cos­ts with a for­war­ding agent.

Land­lords with a small num­ber of resi­den­ti­al units some­ti­mes have exag­ge­ra­ted expec­ta­ti­ons with regard to redu­cing the cos­ts of a “Ber­lin evic­tion”. Even if an auc­tion­eer is invol­ved, the legal­ly com­pli­ant rea­liza­ti­on can­not be car­ri­ed out for vir­tual­ly not­hing. A (pri­va­te) land­lord assu­mes an entre­pre­neu­ri­al risk through his acti­vi­ty, just like any other entre­pre­neur. Pay­ment defaults and coll­ec­tion cos­ts must first be bor­ne by the cre­di­tor befo­re recour­se can be taken against the deb­tor. Howe­ver, with the sta­tu­to­ry land­lor­d’s lien or evic­tion cla­im, the legis­la­tor pri­vi­le­ges the land­lord and the per­son entit­led to evict at this point. In the inte­rests of cre­di­tors and deb­tors, this means that evic­tion claims can be obtai­ned con­sider­a­b­ly fas­ter and more cost-effec­tively than the enforce­ment cla­im via legal action and enforce­ment pro­cee­dings.

The legis­la­tor sti­pu­la­tes that, pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 1235 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB), objects taken in pledge or objects to be cle­ared (Sec­tion 383 BGB default of accep­tance) must be sold by public auc­tion. For the land­lord con­cer­ned, default of pay­ment is a spe­cial situa­ti­on in which we can sup­port him in rea­li­zing the cla­im in accordance with the law thanks to our many years of expe­ri­ence.

Note: The­se texts were pre­pared by Deut­sche Pfand­ver­werr­tung Oster­may­er & Dr. Gold GbR for infor­ma­ti­on pur­po­ses only. Any state­ments on legal and tax mat­ters con­tai­ned the­r­ein should not be regard­ed as legal or tax advice. Alt­hough this web­site has been com­pi­led with care, it can­not be ruled out that it is incom­ple­te or con­ta­ins errors. Fur­ther­mo­re, Oster­may­er & Dr. Gold GbR would like to point out that they hold the copy­right to all con­tent.

A con­tract is con­cluded at an auc­tion in accordance with § 156 BGB, § 18 VerstV by repea­ting the hig­hest bid three times by kno­cking it down at the hig­hest bid. The bid is accept­ed if the auc­tion­eer estab­lishes that the­re are no hig­her bids from the bidders pre­sent at the auc­tion venue on the auc­tion date.

Rea­liza­ti­on is gover­ned by the rele­vant pro­vi­si­ons of the BGB, HGB and Ver­steiV.

The reasons for this are as fol­lows: legal­ly com­pli­ant cle­arance at short noti­ce, legal cer­tain­ty, time savings and savings on fol­low-up cos­ts, unbu­reau­cra­tic, simp­le initia­ti­on of the digi­ti­zed reco­very pro­cess, short-term pro­ces­sing, exten­si­ve addi­tio­nal ser­vices, the best pos­si­ble reco­very pro­ceeds, the fas­test pos­si­ble re-let­ting and, last but not least, social respon­si­bi­li­ty. The­se advan­ta­ges are what make our repu­ta­ti­on, which is why cli­ents choo­se Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tung.