FAQ Cre­di­tors

A sales method. It is an old form of tra­ding that has not chan­ged signi­fi­cant­ly to this day. An auc­tion — also known as a sale by auc­tion or licen­sing — is a way of con­clu­ding a sales con­tract. Inte­res­ted buy­ers (bidders) place bin­ding bids on an auc­tion­ed item. They make an offer to the sel­ler or the auc­tion­eer or auc­tion­eer acting on the sel­ler’s behalf. It is a decla­ra­ti­on of intent aimed at the con­clu­si­on of a con­tract. The hig­hest bid is accept­ed.

A sove­reign act in which mate­ri­al value is con­ver­ted into mone­ta­ry value in accordance with a regu­la­ted pro­ce­du­re. The legal defi­ni­ti­on of Sec­tion 383 (3) sen­tence 1 BGB appli­es to public auc­tions. Pled­ged items or rights based on a sta­tu­to­ry or con­trac­tu­al pledge of rights must be sold by public auc­tion. The pos­si­ble mar­ket pri­ce for this place and time is deter­mi­ned. Auc­tions based on pled­ges of rights must always be public and can only be car­ri­ed out by aut­ho­ri­zed per­sons, such as nota­ries or sworn auc­tion­eers who are gene­ral­ly publicly appoin­ted. The reason for this is that the deb­tor can­not influence the pri­ce and must rely on the auc­tion­eer’s inde­pen­dence and spe­cial exper­ti­se. The auc­tion­eer is sworn to car­ry out his task con­sci­en­tious­ly, wit­hout ins­truc­tions and impar­ti­al­ly. This means that he is obli­ged to car­ry out the valua­ti­on and rea­liza­ti­on at reasonable cost, taking into account the rights of all par­ties invol­ved.

In con­trast to the usu­al method of debt coll­ec­tion by means of dun­ning, legal action or insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings, the rea­liza­ti­on of pled­ges is car­ri­ed out by means of a sim­pli­fied pro­ce­du­re. Howe­ver, becau­se the debtor’s rights are not review­ed in court pro­cee­dings, the legis­la­tor pre­scri­bes a pro­ce­du­re regu­la­ted by the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB), Com­mer­cial Code (HGB), Code of Civil Pro­ce­du­re (ZPO), Com­pul­so­ry Admi­nis­tra­ti­on Act (Zwangs­ver­wal­tungs­ge­setz), Pawn­bro­king Ordi­nan­ce (Pfand­leih­ver­ord­nung), Limi­t­ed Lia­bi­li­ty Com­pa­nies Act (GmbHGB), Stock Cor­po­ra­ti­on Act (AktG) and Auc­tion­eers Ordi­nan­ce (Ver­stei­ge­rer­ver­ord­nung) as a super­vi­so­ry aut­ho­ri­ty.

Under Ger­man law, an auc­tion is the sove­reign act of rea­li­zing a lien. The term “auc­tion­eer” is used in the Auc­tion­eers Ordi­nan­ce (VerstV). In con­nec­tion with public auc­tions (lien auc­tions) by a publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer, the term auc­tion or auc­tion­eer is the­r­e­fo­re not used. A public auc­tion is con­duc­ted accor­ding to the sur­ro­ga­te prin­ci­ple, which means that the mate­ri­al value is con­ver­ted into mone­ta­ry value.

In an auc­tion, on the other hand, a hig­hest bidder is deter­mi­ned for items vol­un­t­a­ri­ly con­si­gned for sale.

No — the pledge of rights ari­ses by law or con­tract.

No — the auc­tion­eer’s esti­ma­te of value is reco­gni­zed in court accor­ding to cur­rent case law.

It is a sove­reign act that may only be car­ri­ed out by aut­ho­ri­zed per­sons such as publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eers in accordance with a legal­ly regu­la­ted pro­ce­du­re.

Acqui­si­ti­on in good faith, exclu­si­on of war­ran­ty, legal peace.

The law sti­pu­la­tes that an auc­tion (rea­liza­ti­on of a lien) must always be held in public. A public auc­tion must be acces­si­ble to a lar­ger, not indi­vi­du­al­ly defi­ned group of peo­p­le. Ever­yo­ne, inclu­ding the deb­tor, has the right to par­ti­ci­pa­te.

Yes, the pled­gee can par­ti­ci­pa­te in the auc­tion: Sec­tion 1239 BGB (1) Bid­ding by the cre­di­tor. If the pled­gee wins the bid, the purcha­se pri­ce is dee­med to have been recei­ved by him. This means that the cre­di­tor can bid up to the amount of his cla­im wit­hout having to make an actu­al pay­ment for the ham­mer pri­ce on the pledge. The pledge then beco­mes the legal pro­per­ty of the cre­di­tor and he can dis­po­se of it free­ly. If the pledge is award­ed to the cre­di­tor for a lower amount than his cla­im, he reta­ins a cla­im against the deb­tor or the insol­ven­cy estate for the remai­ning amount. The cre­di­tor thus reta­ins con­trol and can pre­vent the goods or rights from being sold for less than the pri­ce he had in mind.

It is regu­la­ted by law that the rea­liza­ti­on of liens must take place at the place whe­re the lien ari­ses. The excep­ti­on is if hig­her pro­ceeds could be expec­ted at ano­ther loca­ti­on.

A con­si­gnor is the per­son or entre­pre­neur in who­se pos­ses­si­on the pledge to be auc­tion­ed is loca­ted.

The basic pre­re­qui­si­te is that a con­trac­tu­al pledge has been agreed or that the­re is a sta­tu­to­ry pledge of rights. The lien must have matu­red. This means that the cla­im has fal­len due and the deb­tor has been infor­med of the asser­ti­on of the pledge of rights and the inten­ded rea­liza­ti­on of the pledge in due time. Other­wi­se, the pro­ce­du­re is very simp­le for you as the cli­ent: Fill out the online form to deter­mi­ne the matu­ri­ty of the lien (“Initia­te lien rea­liza­ti­on”) and send it to us (“Sub­mit” but­ton). Then send us meaningful digi­tal pho­tos in jpg for­mat by email — or by WeTrans­fer for lar­ge image files. You will then recei­ve the auc­tion con­tract from us, which con­sti­tu­tes our offer. Your order is only pla­ced with us once you have signed the con­tract.

The recy­cling pro­cess must be car­ri­ed out at reasonable cost. The depo­sit must be adver­ti­sed appro­pria­te­ly so that no accu­sa­ti­on of squan­de­ring can be made. This is more com­plex for a spe­cial machi­ne, a warehouse or a work of art, for exam­p­le, than for an easi­ly saleable car.

Legis­la­ti­on pri­vi­le­ges the sale of pled­ges by public auc­tion.

All items purcha­sed in a public auc­tion are always acqui­red in good faith in accordance with § 935 BGB para. 2. Any war­ran­ty can be excluded. Claims of trade­mark rights are excluded.

No. A land­lord can rely on the ten­an­t’s pre­sump­ti­on of owner­ship in the con­text of the land­lor­d’s lien. If a third par­ty claims to be the owner of the items brought into the ren­ted pre­mi­ses by the ten­ant and the­r­e­fo­re demands their return, the land­lord can rely on the ten­an­t’s pre­sump­ti­on of owner­ship under Sec­tion 1006 BGB to defend his land­lor­d’s lien. This is the result of a decis­i­on by the Fede­ral Court of Jus­ti­ce: Fede­ral Court of Jus­ti­ce, decis­i­on of 03.03.2017 — V ZR 268/15 -. Reaso­ning: Accor­ding to the Fede­ral Court of Jus­ti­ce, the pre­sump­ti­on of owner­ship can be rebut­ted by pro­of to the con­tra­ry. Howe­ver, it is not suf­fi­ci­ent for the third par­ty to pro­ve that they were the owner at an ear­lier point in time. Rather, it is neces­sa­ry to pro­ve that the ten­ant never beca­me the owner despi­te acqui­ring owner­ship.

Yes — the buy­er recei­ves a con­fir­ma­ti­on of purcha­se for sub­mis­si­on to the regis­tra­ti­on office.

Lien rea­liza­ti­ons are car­ri­ed out accor­ding to the Sur­ogat prin­ci­ple. The mate­ri­al value is con­ver­ted into mone­ta­ry value. The pos­si­ble mar­ket pri­ce for that day and place is deter­mi­ned. The­re is the­r­e­fo­re no mini­mum pre­mi­um pri­ce. The depo­sit may not be squan­de­red. The hig­hest bidder must be deter­mi­ned at a reasonable cost. As a regu­la­ti­on, the legis­la­tor allows the cli­ent to par­ti­ci­pa­te in the auc­tion. Of cour­se, he does not have to pay for a knock­down up to the amount of his cla­im.

The buy­er’s pre­mi­um is a fee that the bidder pays in addi­ti­on to the ham­mer pri­ce. Sta­tu­to­ry VAT is char­ged on the buy­er’s pre­mi­um. The amount of the pre­mi­um is sta­ted in the auc­tion announce­ment for the respec­ti­ve auc­tion.

In the case of a public lien rea­liza­ti­on, pay­ment is always made in cash or by cash-like means of pay­ment such as bank-cer­ti­fied checks.

In prin­ci­ple, it should be noted: An object taken in pledge is not the pro­per­ty of the cre­di­tor! A cre­di­tor may not dis­po­se of it as he sees fit. Third par­ties may have legi­ti­ma­te claims of which the cre­di­tor is una­wa­re. The deb­tor has the right to have the pledge sold in accordance with the sta­tu­to­ry pro­vi­si­ons of the pledge of rights. Cf. sec­tion 1244 BGB Unlawful sale (1): “The sale of the pledge is not lawful if the pro­vi­si­ons of sec­tion 1228 (2), sec­tion 1230 sen­tence 2, sec­tion 1235, sec­tion 1237 sen­tence 1 or sec­tion 1240 are vio­la­ted.” Non-legal rea­liza­ti­on of liens can have con­se­quen­ces under civil and cri­mi­nal law.

No, a sale via inter­net plat­forms such as Ebay is not a public auc­tion within the mea­ning of the law.

Important note: If a rent deb­tor remo­ves some or all of the pled­ged pro­per­ty from the ren­ted pro­per­ty while a pledge of rights exists and the cre­di­tor has pre­vious­ly asser­ted the pledge of rights, the rent deb­tor is lia­ble to pro­se­cu­ti­on under § 289 StGB. In this case, cre­di­tors should con­sider fil­ing a cri­mi­nal com­plaint against the ten­ant.

In its ruling (BGH, Octo­ber 9, 2014, Ref.: IX ZR 69/14), the BGH streng­the­ned the land­lor­d’s lien in insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings.

In its ruling (BGH, Octo­ber 9, 2014, Ref.: IX ZR 69/14), the BGH streng­the­ned the land­lor­d’s lien in insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings. Note: If a com­mer­cial ten­an­cy with the deb­tor as ten­ant con­ti­nues after insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings, the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor is NOT entit­led to dis­tri­bu­te the pro­ceeds from the sale of items sub­ject to the land­lor­d’s lien to the land­lord with the repay­ment pro­vi­si­on, to off­set the pay­ment pri­ma­ri­ly against the rent claims estab­lished as a lia­bi­li­ty of the estate after the ope­ning of the pro­cee­dings and only then against the rent claims that aro­se as insol­ven­cy claims befo­re the ope­ning of the pro­cee­dings. Case dealt with by the BGH: A ten­ant was in con­sidera­ble arre­ars and fell into insol­ven­cy. The insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor con­tin­ued to use the ren­tal pro­per­ty even after the ope­ning of insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings, so that the rents due from the ope­ning of insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings were to be adjus­ted by the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor as lia­bi­li­ties of the estate. Howe­ver, the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor did not pay the­se rents. The land­lord exer­cis­ed his land­lor­d’s lien for all rent arre­ars. Pur­su­ant to 3 166 InsO, only the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor was entit­led to rea­li­ze the items sub­ject to the land­lor­d’s lien. Howe­ver, the land­lord was entit­led to a right to sepa­ra­te satis­fac­tion of the rea­liza­ti­on pro­ceeds! After the liqui­da­ti­on, the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor retur­ned the liqui­da­ti­on pro­ceeds with the repay­ment pro­vi­si­on that the insuf­fi­ci­ent pro­ceeds were to be cre­di­ted with prio­ri­ty to the rents due AFTER the ope­ning of insol­ven­cy pro­cee­dings. The BGH ruled in favor of the land­lord, as the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor was not aut­ho­ri­zed to devia­te from the sta­tu­to­ry order of repay­ment when sel­ling the items sub­ject to the land­lor­d’s lien. The land­lord the­r­e­fo­re recei­ves prio­ri­ty in the rea­liza­ti­on of his insol­ven­cy claims from the land­lor­d’s lien, with which he would other­wi­se default (fur­ther details: juris.org).