Erect your fire­wall to secu­re receiv­a­bles: Con­trac­tual­ly agree pled­ges of rights.

The cur­rent fore­cast data from the Purcha­sing Mana­gers’ Index indi­ca­tes that the eco­no­my is in dan­ger of col­lapsing — with serious con­se­quen­ces for the finan­cial situa­ti­on of com­pa­nies.

Taking the right mea­su­res to secu­re receiv­a­bles imme­dia­te­ly is the order of the day.

The reces­si­on in Ger­ma­ny con­ti­nues unab­a­ted. For com­pa­nies, the legal­ly com­pli­ant imple­men­ta­ti­on of effec­ti­ve mecha­nisms for secu­ring receiv­a­bles in their busi­ness pro­ces­ses is of exis­ten­ti­al importance.

Sin­ce its foun­da­ti­on, the Fede­ral Repu­blic of Ger­ma­ny has been a glo­bal­ly admi­red eco­no­mic suc­cess sto­ry. The foun­da­ti­on of this rise was the social mar­ket eco­no­my intro­du­ced by Lud­wig Erhard, which was based on free com­pe­ti­ti­on and at the same time gua­ran­teed the pro­tec­tion of pro­per­ty rights.

Howe­ver, such a situa­ti­on is not gua­ran­teed in the long term. Com­pa­nies are incre­asing­ly relo­ca­ting their pro­duc­tion abroad — or cea­sing ope­ra­ti­ons altog­e­ther.

The news­pa­per “Die Welt” curr­ent­ly wri­tes that all hopes of an end to the down­turn have eva­po­ra­ted. Ger­ma­ny is in dan­ger of fal­ling back into reces­si­on in the coming months. The experts at the Inter­na­tio­nal Mone­ta­ry Fund have issued a gloo­my fore­cast for Ger­ma­ny and attest to con­tin­ued weak­ne­ss. Chi­na is quiet­ly let­ting the Ger­man mecha­ni­cal engi­nee­ring indus­try die, wri­tes the Ger­man busi­ness maga­zi­ne “Wirt­schafts­wo­che”. Cur­rent reports from the busi­ness world are an indi­ca­ti­on of this. At the agri­cul­tu­ral group Bay­wa, debts in the bil­li­ons are piling up. Kol­bus, the world mar­ket lea­der in bookb­in­ding machi­nes, is insol­vent. 550 employees are worried about their jobs. Ina­pa Deutsch­land GmbH has to file for insol­ven­cy. The same goes for the tra­vel com­pa­nies ITra­vel and FTI. And so on and so forth. This is just the begin­ning of a threa­tening wave of bank­rupt­ci­es in Ger­ma­ny. Thou­sands of cre­di­tors are being dis­pos­s­es­sed of their claims.

We don’t com­ment on poli­tics, but deal with the con­se­quen­ces.

Small and medi­um-sized com­pa­nies in par­ti­cu­lar will have to brace them­sel­ves for a gigan­tic wave of bad debts in unpre­ce­den­ted num­bers and amounts. Tho­se who do not prepa­re for this in good time run the risk of being drag­ged into the maelstrom of doom.

“It is not the stron­gest or most intel­li­gent spe­ci­es that sur­vi­ves, but the one that adapts best” said Charles Dar­win. When cir­cum­s­tances chan­ge, we have to adapt.

Deut­sche Pfand­ver­wer­tung has been deal­ing with the short-term rea­liza­ti­on of receiv­a­bles through the appli­ca­ti­on of sta­tu­to­ry or con­trac­tu­al pled­ges of rights for many years. With our pro­ven exper­ti­se, we can pro­vi­de com­pa­nies with prac­ti­cal advice on how to prepa­re for due receiv­a­bles and bad debts.

It is now important to use all legal opti­ons with fore­sight and imple­ment receiv­a­bles pro­tec­tion in accounts receiva­ble manage­ment. Per­sis­ting with pre­vious pro­ces­ses is a dou­ble-edged sword. It encou­ra­ges com­pa­nies to main­tain the sta­tus quo.

Lamen­ting is not an opti­on. If the cus­to­mer does not pay as agreed, it is often due to the com­pany’s own struc­tures. In accordance with the IDW S 6 stan­dards for audi­tors and cur­rent busi­ness manage­ment theo­ry, the reasons for the pro­blems can be iden­ti­fied. The­se fin­dings are appli­ed in most group-affi­lia­ted com­pa­nies to redu­ce pay­ment defaults. Their audi­tors and con­sul­tants have set up the accounts receiva­ble pro­ces­ses in such a way that, in the event of receiv­a­bles fal­ling due, the­re is an imme­dia­te respon­se right down to clerk level. All legal opti­ons are used in the right order in a cost-opti­mi­zed man­ner. This redu­ces the pres­su­re to act. Other­wi­se, a com­pa­ny would have “bad cards” in the event of impen­ding non-pay­ment.

The future of a com­pa­ny is shaped by its dai­ly pro­ces­ses. In most medi­um-sized or smal­ler com­pa­nies, the reac­tion to debt situa­tions is unpre­pared. The ext­ent of pay­ment defaults, which can quick­ly accu­mu­la­te, is not asses­sed in terms of their con­se­quen­ces; ins­tead, well-worn paths are fol­lo­wed, which usual­ly take fore­ver to reach a result, if at all.

We do not regard ever­y­day decis­i­ons as serious decis­i­ons. Howe­ver, becau­se ever­y­day decis­i­ons accu­mu­la­te with all the missteps — over the cour­se of weeks, months or even years — they add up. Ulti­m­ate­ly, this has a major impact on the com­pany’s liqui­di­ty and ear­nings. For effec­ti­ve receiv­a­bles manage­ment, the imple­men­ta­ti­on of many small mea­su­res is far more important than the sup­po­sedly big decis­i­ons. Even if the­se see­mingly small chan­ges do not appear to be par­ti­cu­lar­ly important at the moment, opti­mi­zed pro­ces­ses have an enorm­ous over­all impact on a com­pany’s resi­li­ence in the event of over­due pay­ments and the abili­ty to rea­li­ze receiv­a­bles at short noti­ce.

The fol­lo­wing mea­su­res can be used to imme­dia­te­ly build an effec­ti­ve fire­wall to redu­ce over­due pay­ments and bad debts.

First:

It should be che­cked whe­ther the com­pa­ny can app­ly the pri­vi­le­ge of sta­tu­to­ry pled­ges of rights.

Second­ly:

Good­will in the event of pay­ment arre­ars is rare­ly reward­ed. Expe­ri­ence has shown this. In order to rule out legal dis­ad­van­ta­ges from the out­set, the sta­tu­to­ry pledge of rights should always be asser­ted imme­dia­te­ly to pro­tect your own com­pa­ny when pay­ments are due. Entre­pre­neurs are often una­wa­re of their sta­tu­to­ry pledge of rights. Befo­re an entre­pre­neur files a cost-inten­si­ve lawsu­it, he should defi­ni­te­ly exer­cise his pledge of rights. The neces­si­ty of this pro­ce­du­re can be explai­ned to the deb­tor in fri­end­ly terms.

Third­ly:

In all B‑to‑B con­trac­tu­al rela­ti­onships, the gene­ral terms and con­di­ti­ons should include a clau­se on the pledge of rights, sta­ting that deb­tors under­ta­ke to proac­tively sup­port the rea­liza­ti­on of a pledge.

Fourth­ly:

The con­se­quen­ces of the cri­mi­nal offen­se of pled­ging should be poin­ted out in the con­tract. The majo­ri­ty of deb­tors do not know this.

Fifth­ly:

When len­ding lar­ger sums, the opti­on of a con­trac­tu­al lien agree­ment by pled­ging com­pa­ny shares — at least tem­po­r­a­ri­ly — should be used.

This puts the sub­or­di­na­ted secu­red cre­di­tor in a much stron­ger posi­ti­on when pay­ment is due.

By using the pledge of rights, an entre­pre­neur puts hims­elf in a more advan­ta­ge­ous start­ing posi­ti­on. Cre­di­tors have to accept fewer com­pro­mi­ses and dis­ad­van­ta­ges in nego­tia­ti­ons with deb­tors or insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tors. In the event of impen­ding default, a pro­fes­sio­nal­ly pre­pared nego­tia­ting posi­ti­on is cru­cial, and this could be decisi­ve for the sur­vi­val of your own com­pa­ny.

If you are well posi­tio­ned, you don’t have to be smar­ter than others to achie­ve a bet­ter per­for­mance. Even the smar­test per­son looks stu­pid if they are poor­ly posi­tio­ned. From an opti­mi­zed posi­ti­on, you are supe­ri­or. A com­pa­ny with low debt and liquid assets only has good opti­ons and can take advan­ta­ge of gre­at oppor­tu­ni­ties in the years ahead. But for high­ly indeb­ted entre­pre­neurs, the scope for action is beco­ming ever nar­rower. Your cur­rent posi­ti­on is one thing. The important thing is whe­ther you are pre­pared to impro­ve this posi­ti­on imme­dia­te­ly!

> We look for­ward to hea­ring from you! To the cont­act form.

Fea­tured pho­to: Lazy_Bear, enva­to ele­ments licen­se 9AHNZ526PT

Share post:

Facebook
X
LinkedIn

Further contributions: