Dis­clai­mer of lia­bi­li­ty: We do not pro­vi­de legal or tax advice, only prac­ti­cal infor­ma­ti­on. The con­tent of this web­site is a pre­sen­ta­ti­on of our acti­vi­ties and not an adver­ti­se­ment.

Pledge of rights and explo­ita­ti­on rights of the mer­chant

The sta­tu­to­ry and con­trac­tu­al pledge of rights is a cen­tral instru­ment for mer­chants to secu­re and enforce their claims. By rea­li­zing the pled­ged goods, the mer­chant can rea­li­ze due claims quick­ly, cost-effec­tively and in accordance with the law wit­hout having to rely on leng­thy legal pro­cee­dings.

The public auc­tion (Sec­tions 383, 385 BGB in con­junc­tion with Sec­tions 369 et seq. HGB) for the rea­liza­ti­on of col­la­te­ral offers mer­chants the oppor­tu­ni­ty to enforce their secu­red claims effi­ci­ent­ly and in a value-pre­ser­ving man­ner. A key fea­ture of the public auc­tion is the legal­ly com­pli­ant, trans­pa­rent and eco­no­mic­al­ly opti­mi­zed imple­men­ta­ti­on of the rea­liza­ti­on, in par­ti­cu­lar by publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eers in accordance with the amend­ment to Sec­tion 383 BGB as of 01.01.2025.

This saves the cre­di­tor both time-con­sum­ing and cost-inten­si­ve dun­ning and legal pro­cee­dings as well as the com­mis­sio­ning of a bai­liff who, in accordance with Sec­tion 191 (1) GVGA, may reject the rea­liza­ti­on wit­hout giving reasons — which regu­lar­ly hap­pens in com­plex pro­cee­dings — and can only act local­ly in his dis­trict. The cre­di­tor the­r­e­fo­re bene­fits from a con­sidera­ble time and cost advan­ta­ge com­pared to most other cre­di­tors.

We assu­me the rea­liza­ti­on of col­la­te­ral within the scope of the fol­lo­wing pled­ges of rights under com­mer­cial law: § 369, § 371, § 373, § 376B, § 379, § 388, § 391, § 397, § 398 HGB.

Advan­ta­ges of the rea­liza­ti­on of liens:

We car­ry out rea­liza­ti­ons for mer­chants

Recy­cling is car­ri­ed out in com­pli­ance with the sta­tu­to­ry pro­vi­si­ons.

Legal­ly com­pli­ant pro­ce­du­re

Iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on and sel­ec­tion

Com­mer­cial exper­ti­se in gene­ra­ting sui­ta­ble pro­s­pec­ti­ve buy­ers, natio­nal­ly and inter­na­tio­nal­ly, for hig­her sales pro­ceeds

Pool of pro­s­pec­ti­ve buy­ers

A base of poten­ti­al buy­ers for items of all kinds built up over many years

Maxi­mum legal cer­tain­ty

Reduc­tion of lia­bi­li­ty due to sta­tu­to­ry pro­vi­si­ons in the case of rea­liza­ti­on by publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eers by way of public auc­tion.

Many years of expe­ri­ence

For more than ten years, we have been cal­led in to rea­li­ze the lien and rea­liza­ti­on rights for mer­chants.

Time and cost savings

No time-con­sum­ing and cost-inten­si­ve dun­ning and legal pro­cee­dings neces­sa­ry.

We per­form due to:

Pledge of rights and explo­ita­ti­on rights of the mer­chant

Pledge of rights and explo­ita­ti­on rights of the mer­chant

The public auc­tion enables the mer­chant to rea­li­ze due claims at short noti­ce, cost-effec­tively and in com­pli­ance with the law. We rea­li­ze your pled­ges of rights and con­duct public auc­tions in accordance with HGB § 369, § 371, § 373, § 376B, § 379, § 388, § 391, § 397, § 398 and § 440.

§ Sec­tion 369 HGB due to receiv­a­bles from mutu­al com­mer­cial tran­sac­tions

Pledge of rights and rights of rea­liza­ti­on of the mer­chant pur­su­ant to § 369 HGB Right of reten­ti­on

In the case of mutu­al com­mer­cial tran­sac­tions, Sec­tion 369 HGB allows the mer­chant a lien-like right of satis­fac­tion on goods or secu­ri­ties against the other par­ty to the con­tract. In the event of insol­ven­cy, Sec­tion 51 No. 3 InsO allows the com­mer­cial right of reten­ti­on the right to sepa­ra­te satis­fac­tion.

§ Sec­tion 369 HGB
1) A mer­chant has a right of reten­ti­on to the mova­ble goods and secu­ri­ties of the deb­tor which have come into his pos­ses­si­on with his will on the basis of com­mer­cial tran­sac­tions, inso­far as he still has them in his pos­ses­si­on, in par­ti­cu­lar can dis­po­se of them by means of bills of lading, con­sign­ment bills or warehouse receipts, due to the claims due to him against ano­ther mer­chant from the mutu­al com­mer­cial tran­sac­tions con­cluded bet­ween them. The right of reten­ti­on is also jus­ti­fied if owner­ship of the object has been trans­fer­red from the deb­tor to the cre­di­tor or has been trans­fer­red from a third par­ty to the cre­di­tor on behalf of the deb­tor but has been trans­fer­red back to the deb­tor.

(2) The right of reten­ti­on shall exist vis-à-vis a third par­ty to the ext­ent that the third par­ty can be asser­ted against the debtor’s cla­im for the return of the object.
(3) The right of reten­ti­on shall be excluded if the reten­ti­on of the object con­tra­dicts the ins­truc­tion given by the deb­tor befo­re or at the time of deli­very or the obli­ga­ti­on assu­med by the cre­di­tor to deal with the object in a cer­tain way.

(4) The deb­tor may avert the exer­cise of the right of reten­ti­on by pro­vi­ding secu­ri­ty. The pro­vi­si­on of secu­ri­ty by gua­ran­tors is excluded.

§ Sec­tion 371 HGB
(1) The cre­di­tor is aut­ho­ri­zed by vir­tue of the right of reten­ti­on to satis­fy his cla­im from the retai­ned object. If a third par­ty has a right to the object against which the right of reten­ti­on can be asser­ted pur­su­ant to sec­tion 369 (2), the cre­di­tor shall have prio­ri­ty with regard to satis­fac­tion from the object.
(2) Satis­fac­tion shall be effec­ted in accordance with the pro­vi­si­ons of the Ger­man Civil Code appli­ca­ble to the pledge of rights. The peri­od of one month spe­ci­fied in sec­tion 1234 of the Civil Code shall be repla­ced by a peri­od of one week.
(3) If satis­fac­tion does not take place by way of com­pul­so­ry enforce­ment, it shall be admis­si­ble only after the cre­di­tor has obtai­ned an enforceable title for his right to satis­fac­tion against the owner or, if the object belongs to him, against the deb­tor; in the lat­ter case, the pro­vi­si­ons of the Civil Code rela­ting to the owner on satis­fac­tion shall app­ly muta­tis mut­an­dis to the deb­tor. In the absence of an enforceable title, the sale of the object is not lawful.
(4) The action for per­mis­si­on to satis­fy the cla­im may be brought befo­re the court in who­se dis­trict the cre­di­tor has his gene­ral place of juris­dic­tion or the place of juris­dic­tion of his place of busi­ness.

pur­su­ant to § 371 HGB right of satis­fac­tion

Pledge of rights and rights of rea­liza­ti­on of the mer­chant pur­su­ant to § 371 HGB Right of satis­fac­tion

§ Sec­tion 371 HGB
(1) The cre­di­tor is aut­ho­ri­zed by vir­tue of the right of reten­ti­on to satis­fy his cla­im from the retai­ned object. If a third par­ty has a right to the object against which the right of reten­ti­on can be asser­ted pur­su­ant to sec­tion 369 (2), the cre­di­tor shall have prio­ri­ty with regard to satis­fac­tion from the object.
(2) Satis­fac­tion shall be effec­ted in accordance with the pro­vi­si­ons of the Ger­man Civil Code appli­ca­ble to the pledge of rights. The peri­od of one month spe­ci­fied in sec­tion 1234 of the Civil Code shall be repla­ced by a peri­od of one week.
(3) If satis­fac­tion does not take place by way of com­pul­so­ry enforce­ment, it shall be admis­si­ble only after the cre­di­tor has obtai­ned an enforceable title for his right to satis­fac­tion against the owner or, if the object belongs to him, against the deb­tor; in the lat­ter case, the pro­vi­si­ons of the Civil Code rela­ting to the owner on satis­fac­tion shall app­ly muta­tis mut­an­dis to the deb­tor. In the absence of an enforceable title, the sale of the object is not lawful.
(4) The action for per­mis­si­on to satis­fy the cla­im may be brought befo­re the court in who­se dis­trict the cre­di­tor has his gene­ral place of juris­dic­tion or the place of juris­dic­tion of his place of busi­ness.

Accor­ding to § 397 HGB, the com­mis­si­on agent has a sta­tu­to­ry pledge of rights from the goods on com­mis­si­on, inclu­ding the cos­ts, advan­ces and com­mis­si­ons used on the goods. The pre­re­qui­si­te for this is that he is in pos­ses­si­on of the goods, in par­ti­cu­lar that he can dis­po­se of them by means of bills of lading, con­sign­ment bills or warehouse receipts (see Marx/Arens Der Auk­tio­na­tor, 2004, p. 274).

§ 373 HGB Default of accep­tance
Pledge of rights and rights of rea­liza­ti­on of the mer­chant accor­ding to § 373 HGB Default of accep­tance / self-help sale / depo­sit
(1) If the Buy­er is in default of accep­tance of the goods, the Sel­ler may depo­sit the goods in a public warehouse or other­wi­se in a safe man­ner at the risk and expen­se of the Buy­er.

(2) He is fur­ther aut­ho­ri­zed, after pri­or war­ning, to have the goods sold by public auc­tion; if the goods have a stock exch­an­ge or mar­ket pri­ce, he may, after pri­or war­ning, also effect the sale by pri­va­te trea­ty through a com­mer­cial bro­ker publicly aut­ho­ri­zed to make such sales or through a per­son aut­ho­ri­zed to sell at public auc­tion at the cur­rent pri­ce. 2Ifthe goods are at risk of spoi­la­ge and the­re is immi­nent dan­ger, no pri­or thre­at is requi­red; the same appli­es if the thre­at is imprac­ti­ca­ble for other reasons.

(3) The self-help sale is made for the account of the defaul­ting buy­er.

(4) The sel­ler and the buy­er may bid at the public auc­tion.

(5) 1Inthe case of a public auc­tion, the sel­ler must noti­fy the buy­er in advan­ce of the time and place of the auc­tion; he must inform the buy­er imme­dia­te­ly of the com­ple­ted sale for each type of sale. 2Inthe event of fail­ure to do so, he shall be lia­ble for dama­ges. 3Thenoti­fi­ca­ti­ons may be omit­ted if they are imprac­ti­cal (see Marx/Arens Der Auk­tio­na­tor, 2004, p. 274).

§ 376 HGB Fixed trade purcha­se

Pledge of rights and rights of rea­liza­ti­on of the mer­chant pur­su­ant to § 376 HGB Default in per­for­mance

(1) If it is sti­pu­la­ted that the per­for­mance of one par­ty is to be effec­ted exact­ly at a fixed time or within a fixed peri­od, the other par­ty may, if the per­for­mance is not effec­ted at the fixed time or within the fixed peri­od, rescind the con­tract or, if the deb­tor is in default, cla­im dama­ges for non-per­for­mance ins­tead of per­for­mance. He can only cla­im per­for­mance if he noti­fies the other par­ty imme­dia­te­ly after the expiry of the time or dead­line that he insists on per­for­mance.

(2) If dama­ges are clai­med for non-per­for­mance and the goods have an exch­an­ge or mar­ket pri­ce, the dif­fe­rence bet­ween the purcha­se pri­ce and the exch­an­ge or mar­ket pri­ce at the time and place of the per­for­mance owed may be clai­med.
(3) The result of a sale or purcha­se effec­ted else­whe­re may, if the com­mo­di­ties have a stock exch­an­ge or mar­ket pri­ce, be taken as the basis of the cla­im for dama­ges only if the sale or purcha­se is effec­ted imme­dia­te­ly after the expiry of the sti­pu­la­ted time or peri­od for per­for­mance. If the sale or purcha­se is not made by public auc­tion, it must be made at the cur­rent pri­ce by a com­mer­cial bro­ker aut­ho­ri­zed to make such sales or purcha­ses or by a per­son aut­ho­ri­zed to make such sales or purcha­ses by public auc­tion.
(4) The pro­vi­si­on of sec­tion 373 (4) shall app­ly to the sale by public auc­tion. The cre­di­tor shall noti­fy the deb­tor of the sale or purcha­se wit­hout delay; in the event of fail­ure to do so he shall be lia­ble to pay dama­ges.

§ Sec­tion 376 of the Ger­man Com­mer­cial Code (HGB ) Default in per­for­mance in a fixed-date tran­sac­tion: In the case of a fixed-date purcha­se, the sel­ler or the buy­er can buy or sell the goods owed at public auc­tion in the event of default in per­for­mance by the other par­ty to the con­tract in accordance with Sec­tion 376 HGB and use the dif­fe­rence as the basis for dama­ges for non-per­for­mance. (Cf. Marx/Arens Der Auk­tio­na­tor, 2004, p. 281).

§ Sec­tion 379 HGB Tem­po­ra­ry sto­rage; distress sale

Pledge of rights and rights of rea­liza­ti­on of the mer­chant pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 379 HGB Tem­po­ra­ry sto­rage; distress sale

(1) If the purcha­se is a com­mer­cial tran­sac­tion for both par­ties, the buy­er is obli­ged, if he com­plains about the goods sent to him from ano­ther place, to ensu­re their tem­po­ra­ry sto­rage.

(2) If the goods are expo­sed to spoi­la­ge and the­re is immi­nent dan­ger, he may have them sold sub­ject to the pro­vi­si­ons of sec­tion 373.

§ 388 HGB Defec­ti­ve goods on com­mis­si­on

§ 388 HGB Defec­ti­ve goods on com­mis­si­on

(1) If the goods sent to the com­mis­si­on agent are in a dama­ged or defec­ti­ve con­di­ti­on upon deli­very, which is extern­al­ly reco­gnizable, the com­mis­si­on agent shall safe­guard the rights against the car­ri­er or ship­per, pro­vi­de evi­dence of the con­di­ti­on and noti­fy the prin­ci­pal wit­hout delay; in the event of fail­ure to do so, he shall be lia­ble for dama­ges.

(2) If the goods are sub­ject to dete­rio­ra­ti­on or if chan­ges sub­se­quent­ly occur in the goods which give rise to fears of their depre­cia­ti­on, and if the­re is no time to obtain the order of the prin­ci­pal, or if the prin­ci­pal defaults in issuing the order, the com­mis­si­on agent may effect the sale of the goods in accordance with the pro­vi­si­ons of sec­tion 373.

§ Sec­tion 391 HGB Distress sale

Pledge of rights and rea­liza­ti­on rights of the mer­chant accor­ding to § 391 distress sale

§ Sec­tion 391 (Duty to inspect and give noti­ce of defects, sto­rage and emer­gen­cy sale in the case of a purcha­se com­mis­si­on) HGB ( Ger­man Com­mer­cial Code )
1If a purcha­se com­mis­si­on is issued which is a com­mer­cial tran­sac­tion for both par­ties, the pro­vi­si­ons of sec­tions 377 to 379 appli­ca­ble to the buy­er shall app­ly muta­tis mut­an­dis with regard to the prin­ci­pal’s duty to inspect the goods and to noti­fy the com­mis­si­on agent of any defects dis­co­ver­ed, as well as with regard to the care for the sto­rage of the goods com­plai­ned of and to the sale in the event of immi­nent spoi­la­ge. 2The prin­ci­pal’s cla­im to assign­ment of the rights to which the com­mis­si­on agent is entit­led against the third par­ty from whom he purcha­sed the goods for the account of the prin­ci­pal shall not be affec­ted by a late noti­fi­ca­ti­on of the defect.

Auc­tion due to risk of immi­nent spoi­la­ge, reduc­tion in value or dis­pro­por­tio­na­te cos­ts

a) In the case of a com­mer­cial purcha­se
The com­mis­si­on agent may have the goods sold by public auc­tion in accordance with the pro­vi­si­ons of Sec­tion 373 HGB due to immi­nent spoi­la­ge of the goods under the con­di­ti­ons of Sec­tions 388 and 391 HGB.

The for­war­der may have the goods sold by public auc­tion in accordance with the pro­vi­si­ons of Sec­tion 373 HGB due to immi­nent spoi­la­ge of the goods under the con­di­ti­ons of Sec­tion 407 HGB.

The warehouse kee­per may have a public auc­tion held in accordance with the pro­vi­si­ons of Sec­tion 373 HGB due to immi­nent spoi­la­ge of the goods under the con­di­ti­ons of Sec­tion 417 HGB.

If the goods are at risk of spoi­la­ge, the car­ri­er may sell them at public auc­tion in accordance with the pro­vi­si­ons of § 437 HGB (Ger­man Com­mer­cial Code) and § 373 HGB (Ger­man Com­mer­cial Code).

b) in other cases
Accor­ding to Sec­tion 383 (1) sen­tence 2 BGB, the deb­tor is entit­led to sell the item owed at public auc­tion under the con­di­ti­ons of Sec­tion 372 sen­tence 2 BGB. 2 BGB, the deb­tor is entit­led to sell the debtor’s pro­per­ty at public auc­tion if it is capa­ble of being depo­si­ted but the­re is a risk of spoi­la­ge or its sto­rage would invol­ve dis­pro­por­tio­na­te cos­ts.

Accor­ding to § 1219 BGB, the pled­gee can have the pledge auc­tion­ed off in the event of immi­nent spoi­la­ge of the pledge or the risk of a signi­fi­cant reduc­tion in value (see Marx/Arens Der Auk­tio­na­tor, 2004, p. 280, 281).

§ Sec­tion 397 HGB Com­mis­si­on agen­t’s lien

Pledge of rights and rea­liza­ti­on rights of the mer­chant accor­ding to § 397 Com­mis­sío­närs­pfand­recht

Accor­ding to § 397 HGB, the com­mis­si­on agent has a sta­tu­to­ry pledge of rights from the goods on com­mis­si­on, inclu­ding the cos­ts, advan­ces and com­mis­si­ons used on the goods. The pre­re­qui­si­te for this is that he is in pos­ses­si­on of the goods, in par­ti­cu­lar that he can dis­po­se of them by means of bills of lading, con­sign­ment bills or warehouse receipts

(Cf. Marx/Arens Der Auk­tio­na­tor, 2004, p. 274).

§ Sec­tion 398 HGB Pledge of rights of the purcha­sing com­mis­si­on agent

Pledge of rights and rights of rea­liza­ti­on of the mer­chant pur­su­ant to § 398 Pledge of rights of the purcha­sing com­mis­si­on agent

Accor­ding to § 398 HGB, the purcha­sing com­mis­si­on agent who has not yet trans­fer­red the goods on com­mis­si­on to the prin­ci­pal, i.e. is not the owner, can satis­fy the claims men­tio­ned in § 397 HGB by way of a sale by pledge (cf. Marx/Arens Der Auk­tio­na­tor, 2004, p. 274).

Ques­ti­ons about:

Cos­ts

Mana­geable cos­ts

We are obli­ged to car­ry out the valua­ti­on and rea­liza­ti­on at reasonable cos­ts, taking into account the rights of all par­ties invol­ved. The amount is based on the type of pledge and the effort requi­red to achie­ve ade­qua­te rea­liza­ti­on pro­ceeds in the inte­rests of the deb­tor. As remu­ne­ra­ti­on for his expen­ses and acti­vi­ties, the auc­tion­eer recei­ves a lump sum from the cli­ent and a so-cal­led pre­mi­um on the ham­mer pri­ce from the buy­ers. In order to avo­id any accu­sa­ti­on of squan­de­ring, the pledge should be adver­ti­sed in an appro­pria­te form. The grea­ter the demand for the pled­ged item, the lower the flat fee.

Important to know: The deb­tor bears the cos­ts of the pro­cee­dings. Unrea­lizable cos­ts can be clai­med as expen­ses for tax pur­po­ses by the cre­di­tor.

The Auc­tion­eer shall have unli­mi­t­ed and per­so­nal lia­bi­li­ty for cul­pa­ble brea­ches of duty. The cli­ent can­not release the auc­tion­eer from this lia­bi­li­ty for dama­ges. The auc­tion­eer’s remu­ne­ra­ti­on is the­r­e­fo­re always also a lia­bi­li­ty remu­ne­ra­ti­on.

Spe­cial situa­ti­on insol­ven­cy

Quick gui­de for mer­chants
Rea­liza­ti­on of liens in the event of distress/insolvency

Imme­dia­te situa­ti­on pic­tu­re

  • Pled­ges of rights typi­cal­ly ari­se by law or by con­tract, e.g:
  • - Com­mer­cial right of retention/pledge of rights to goods/documents han­ded over for out­stan­ding claims from mutu­al com­mer­cial tran­sac­tions (§§ 369 ff. HGB).
  • - con­trac­tu­al pled­ges of rights (secu­ri­ty agree­ments, gene­ral terms and con­di­ti­ons pled­ges).
  • - Indus­try-spe­ci­fic pled­ges of rights (warehouse keeper/forwarder/works contractor/landlord as spe­cial cases).
  • Core requi­re­ment almost always: direct pos­ses­si­on of the goods/item.
  • Objec­ti­ve: Rea­li­ze receiv­a­bles quick­ly, cost-effec­tively and in com­pli­ance with the law wit­hout dunning/complaint/enforcement pro­cee­dings.

Decisi­ve in prac­ti­ce (prio­ri­ty = pos­ses­si­on + matu­ri­ty)

  • The cus­to­mer shall not sur­ren­der the pled­ged pro­per­ty as long as the secu­red cla­im is out­stan­ding and due.
  • Sur­ren­der “as a ges­tu­re of good­will” regu­lar­ly leads to the loss of the lien posi­ti­on.
  • Check and docu­ment imme­dia­te­ly:
  • - which claims are secu­red (prin­ci­pal and ancil­la­ry claims).
  • - which spe­ci­fic items are cover­ed.
  • - whe­ther grounds for exclu­si­on app­ly (e.g. third-par­ty pro­per­ty, non-seiza­bi­li­ty, reten­ti­on of title by third par­ties).

Do’s — con­cre­te road­map

  • Deter­mi­ne pledge situa­ti­on intern­al­ly: Inven­to­ry list (item, seri­al no., con­di­ti­on, loca­ti­on), cla­ri­fy owner­ship situa­ti­on, list of receiv­a­bles with due date/interest/ancillary claims.
  • Inform the deb­tor or (pro­vi­sio­nal) insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor in wri­ting: Refe­rence to the pledge of rights, desi­gna­ti­on of the pled­ged pro­per­ty, amount of the cla­im, short dead­line for pay­ment or con­sent to rea­liza­ti­on.
  • Initia­te rea­liza­ti­on: public auc­tion is the rule for col­la­te­ral enforce­ment (§§ 1228 ff., 1235 BGB); com­mis­si­on a publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer.
  • Imme­dia­te­ly prio­ri­ti­ze time-cri­ti­cal or depre­cia­ting goods (sea­so­nal, tech­ni­cal, peri­s­ha­ble goods); pre­sent reco­very plan with dead­line and expec­ted pro­ceeds.
  • Secu­re audit trail: com­ple­te docu­men­ta­ti­on of the recy­cling pro­cess.

Don’ts — typi­cal lia­bi­li­ty traps

  • No quick sale by pri­va­te trea­ty wit­hout a legal basis or effec­ti­ve rea­liza­ti­on agree­ment.
  • No M&A/bidding pro­ce­du­re as a sub­sti­tu­te for a sta­tu­to­ry auc­tion.
  • No uti­liza­ti­on of third-par­ty pro­per­ty wit­hout pri­or cla­ri­fi­ca­ti­on.
  • No unaut­ho­ri­zed destruction/disposal sole­ly due to sto­rage cos­ts.

Insol­ven­cy of the deb­tor — what chan­ges

  • Claims up to the ope­ning = insol­ven­cy claims → regis­ter in the table.
  • Pled­ges of rights retain their value (segre­ga­ti­on).
  • The right of explo­ita­ti­on depends on pos­ses­si­on:
  • - Pled­ged pro­per­ty in the pos­ses­si­on of the mer­chant → inde­pen­dent col­la­te­ral enforce­ment pos­si­ble accor­ding to BGB rules.
  • - Pled­ged pro­per­ty in the pos­ses­si­on of the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor → admi­nis­tra­tor rea­li­zes; pay­ment to the mer­chant from the pro­ceeds after con­tri­bu­ti­on to cos­ts.
  • Blo­cka­de by admi­nis­tra­tor: pro­ve bet­ter alter­na­ti­ve rea­liza­ti­on, set dead­line, then invol­ve insol­ven­cy court/creditor com­mit­tee.

How we typi­cal­ly sup­port

  • Pledge rea­liza­ti­on app­rai­sal / quick valua­ti­on for reve­nue and inte­rest argu­men­ta­ti­on.
  • Legal­ly com­pli­ant public auc­tion by publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer (also online/live).
  • Fire sale capa­bi­li­ty: short-term buy­er acti­va­ti­on to secu­re the maxi­mum pri­ce and quick cle­arance.

Important for your actions

A mer­chan­t’s pledge of rights is a quick way of rea­li­zing a cla­im — but only if pos­ses­si­on is held, owner­ship is pro­per­ly che­cked and publicly exploi­ted in accordance with the law.

If the rea­liza­ti­on of col­la­te­ral
is time-cri­ti­cal and con­fi­den­ti­al:
Cont­act us.

Ele­ment #1