Dis­clai­mer of lia­bi­li­ty: We do not pro­vi­de legal or tax advice, only prac­ti­cal infor­ma­ti­on. The con­tent of this web­site is a pre­sen­ta­ti­on of our acti­vi­ties and not an adver­ti­se­ment.

Col­la­te­ral enforce­ment due to divi­si­on

The non-par­ti­san valua­ti­on and sub­se­quent dis­tri­bu­ti­on of all mova­ble assets and com­pa­ny shares is car­ri­ed out through the order­ly con­ver­si­on of tan­gi­ble assets into liquid assets. This is an effi­ci­ent and legal­ly com­pli­ant method for taking all par­ties invol­ved into account in the shor­test pos­si­ble time and ensu­ring eco­no­mic­al­ly via­ble solu­ti­ons.

As part of this rea­liza­ti­on, a neu­tral valua­ti­on of the assets is car­ri­ed out in order to pro­per­ly deter­mi­ne their mar­ket value. The sale is then car­ri­ed out by way of a public auc­tion by publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eers, which ensu­res a trans­pa­rent and fair pro­cess. This pro­ce­du­re avo­ids poten­ti­al dis­pu­tes bet­ween the par­ties invol­ved, enables a fair dis­tri­bu­ti­on of the pro­ceeds and at the same time ensu­res that the assets are liqui­da­ted quick­ly.

The public auc­tion by a gene­ral­ly publicly appoin­ted and sworn auc­tion­eer con­sti­tu­tes a sove­reign act. The knock­down in accordance with Sec­tion 156 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB) is a legal­ly for­ma­ti­ve sove­reign act and leads to the bin­ding deter­mi­na­ti­on of the value of the auc­tion­ed pro­per­ty.

Bin­ding effect for the tax office

Under tax law, the fair mar­ket value (§ 9 BewG) is deter­mi­ned on the basis of the pri­ce that can be achie­ved in the ordi­na­ry cour­se of busi­ness. The ham­mer pri­ce achie­ved in a public auc­tion gene­ral­ly accu­ra­te­ly reflects this mar­ket value. The tax office is the­r­e­fo­re gene­ral­ly bound by the ham­mer pri­ce.

Case law and admi­nis­tra­ti­ve prac­ti­ce

BFH, judgment of 17.10.2001 — II R 85/99: The ham­mer pri­ce from a public auc­tion is the fair mar­ket value.
Inhe­ri­tance Tax Gui­de­lines (R B 11.2 Erb­StR): In the case of public auc­tions, the actu­al pro­ceeds rea­li­zed must be taken into account.

This method pro­ves to be a legal­ly com­pli­ant, effi­ci­ent and eco­no­mic­al­ly opti­mi­zed solu­ti­on, par­ti­cu­lar­ly in inhe­ri­tance law dis­pu­tes, cor­po­ra­te law sepa­ra­ti­ons and the rea­liza­ti­on of col­la­te­ral in the con­text of dis­pu­tes bet­ween par­ties.

Advan­ta­ges of the rea­liza­ti­on of liens:

We con­duct par­ti­ti­on auc­tions on the basis of sta­tu­to­ry pro­vi­si­ons.

Recon­ci­lia­ti­on of inte­rests

By way of public auc­tion, the mate­ri­al value is deter­mi­ned by sur­ro­ga­ti­on in rem and the mone­ta­ry value can be divi­ded up.

Iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on and sel­ec­tion

Com­mer­cial exper­ti­se in gene­ra­ting sui­ta­ble pro­s­pec­ti­ve buy­ers, natio­nal­ly and inter­na­tio­nal­ly, for hig­her sales pro­ceeds.

Pool of pro­s­pec­ti­ve buy­ers

Ongo­ing cont­act manage­ment with pro­s­pec­ti­ve buy­ers for com­pa­ny shares and objects of all kinds

Legal cer­tain­ty

Reduc­tion of lia­bi­li­ty due to sta­tu­to­ry pro­vi­si­ons in the case of rea­liza­ti­on by publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eers by way of public auc­tion.

Many years of expe­ri­ence

For over fif­teen years we have been com­mis­sio­ned to car­ry out par­ti­ti­on auc­tions.

Time and cost savings

No time-con­sum­ing and cost-inten­si­ve dun­ning and legal pro­cee­dings neces­sa­ry.

We per­form due to:

Par­ti­ti­on auc­tion

Par­ti­ti­on auc­tion

The non-par­ti­san valua­ti­on and dis­tri­bu­ti­on of all mova­ble assets and com­pa­ny shares is car­ri­ed out by con­ver­ting tan­gi­ble assets into mone­ta­ry value. This is the easy way to satis­fy all par­ties in the short term.

§ Sec­tion 731 BGB Sett­le­ment in the event of divi­si­on

Par­ti­ti­on auc­tion in accordance with Sec­tion 731 of the Ger­man Civil Code (BGB) Sett­le­ment in the event of par­ti­ti­on

In the absence of any other agree­ment, the divi­si­on shall be car­ri­ed out in accordance with Sec­tions 732 to 735. In all other respects, the pro­vi­si­ons on com­mu­ni­ty auc­tions in the event of dis­so­lu­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty shall app­ly to the divi­si­on.

Par­ti­al auc­tion upon dis­so­lu­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty
Pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 753 (1) BGB , the dis­so­lu­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty, pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 731 i. V.m. § Sec­tion 753 BGB, the pro­vi­si­ons on the sale of pled­ges app­ly to the dis­so­lu­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty, the sett­le­ment bet­ween mem­bers of the com­pa­ny, the spou­ses after the ter­mi­na­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty of pro­per­ty (Sec­tion 1477 (1) BGB), the par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on in the dis­so­lu­ti­on of the con­tin­ued com­mu­ni­ty of pro­per­ty (Sec­tion 1498 BGB) and the sett­le­ment of the co-heirs (Sec­tion 2042 (2) BGB).

If an ami­ca­ble agree­ment on the divi­si­on of the pro­ceeds can­not be rea­ched, the pro­ceeds must be depo­si­ted with the depo­si­to­ry of the com­pe­tent local court in favor of the heirs.

§ 749 BGB Can­cel­la­ti­on

Par­ti­al auc­tion in accordance with § 749 BGB Can­cel­la­ti­on

  1. Each part­ner can demand the dis­so­lu­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty at any time
  2. If the right to demand ter­mi­na­ti­on is excluded by agree­ment for good or for a limi­t­ed peri­od, ter­mi­na­ti­on may nevert­hel­ess be deman­ded if the­re is good cau­se. Under the same con­di­ti­on, if a noti­ce peri­od is sti­pu­la­ted, ter­mi­na­ti­on may be deman­ded wit­hout obser­ving the noti­ce peri­od.
  3. An agree­ment which excludes or rest­ricts the right to demand rescis­si­on con­tra­ry to the­se pro­vi­si­ons shall be null and void.

Par­ti­al auc­tion upon dis­so­lu­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty
Pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 753 (1) BGB , the dis­so­lu­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty, pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 731 i. V.m. § Sec­tion 753 BGB, the pro­vi­si­ons on the sale of pled­ges app­ly to the dis­so­lu­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty, the sett­le­ment bet­ween mem­bers of the com­pa­ny, the spou­ses after the ter­mi­na­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty of pro­per­ty (Sec­tion 1477 (1) BGB), the par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on in the dis­so­lu­ti­on of the con­tin­ued com­mu­ni­ty of pro­per­ty (Sec­tion 1498 BGB) and the sett­le­ment of the co-heirs (Sec­tion 2042 (2) BGB).

If an ami­ca­ble agree­ment on the divi­si­on of the pro­ceeds can­not be rea­ched, the pro­ceeds shall be depo­si­ted with the depo­si­to­ry of the com­pe­tent local court in favor of the entit­led par­ties.

§ Sec­tion 753 BGB Divi­si­on by sale

Par­ti­ti­on auc­tion in accordance with § 753 BGB Divi­si­on by sale

  1. If divi­si­on is excluded by natu­re, the com­mu­ni­ty shall be dis­sol­ved by sel­ling the com­mon pro­per­ty in accordance with the pro­vi­si­ons on the sale of pled­ges, in the case of land by forced sale, and by divi­ding the pro­ceeds. If the sale to a third par­ty is not per­mit­ted, the object shall be auc­tion­ed off among the part­ners

  2. If the attempt to sell the object is unsuc­cessful, each part­ner may demand that it be repea­ted; howe­ver, he must bear the cos­ts if the repea­ted attempt fails.

Par­ti­al auc­tion upon dis­so­lu­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty
Pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 753 (1) BGB , the dis­so­lu­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty, pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 731 i. V.m. § Sec­tion 753 BGB, the pro­vi­si­ons on the sale of pled­ges app­ly to the dis­so­lu­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty, the sett­le­ment bet­ween mem­bers of the com­pa­ny, the spou­ses after the ter­mi­na­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty of pro­per­ty (Sec­tion 1477 (1) BGB), the par­ti­ci­pa­ti­on in the dis­so­lu­ti­on of the con­tin­ued com­mu­ni­ty of pro­per­ty (Sec­tion 1498 BGB) and the sett­le­ment of the co-heirs (Sec­tion 2042 (2) BGB).

If an ami­ca­ble agree­ment on the divi­si­on of the pro­ceeds can­not be rea­ched, the pro­ceeds must be depo­si­ted with the depo­si­to­ry of the com­pe­tent local court in favor of the entit­led par­ties

§ Sec­tion 2042 BGB Sett­le­ment of the com­mu­ni­ty of heirs

Par­ti­al auc­tion pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 2042 BGB Sett­le­ment of the com­mu­ni­ty of heirs

  1. Each heir may demand sett­le­ment at any time, unless other­wi­se pro­vi­ded for in Sec­tions 2043 to 2045.
  2. The pro­vi­si­ons of Sec­tion 749 (2), (3) and Sec­tions 750 to 758 shall app­ly.

Each heir can the­r­e­fo­re demand the sett­le­ment of the com­mu­ni­ty of heirs at any time (Sec­tion 2042 BGB), unless the sett­le­ment is excluded in the will or the­re are reasons for post­po­ne­ment. If the heirs fail to reach an agree­ment on the sett­le­ment, the com­mu­ni­ty is dis­sol­ved by sel­ling the joint pro­per­ty in accordance with the pro­vi­si­ons on the sale of pled­ges, in the case of real estate by forced sale (ZVG) and by divi­ding the pro­ceeds (§ 180 ff ZVG). The items are sold in a public auc­tion by a gene­ral­ly publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer. The sale of the items is due at any time, as each par­ti­ci­pant can demand the dis­so­lu­ti­on of the com­mu­ni­ty at any time. All mem­bers of the com­mu­ni­ty must be noti­fied of the inten­ti­on to dis­sol­ve, i.e. to liqui­da­te, with a sales peri­od of one month. The sale may only take place after the dead­line has expi­red if a public announce­ment has been made and the par­ties to the pro­cee­dings have been noti­fied.

If an ami­ca­ble agree­ment on the divi­si­on of the pro­ceeds can­not be rea­ched, the pro­ceeds must be depo­si­ted with the depo­si­to­ry of the com­pe­tent local court in favor of the heirs.

Ques­ti­ons about:

Cos­ts

Mana­geable cos­ts

We are obli­ged to car­ry out the valua­ti­on and rea­liza­ti­on at reasonable cos­ts, taking into account the rights of all par­ties invol­ved. The amount is based on the type of pledge and the effort requi­red to achie­ve ade­qua­te rea­liza­ti­on pro­ceeds in the inte­rests of the deb­tor. As remu­ne­ra­ti­on for his expen­ses and acti­vi­ties, the auc­tion­eer recei­ves a lump sum from the cli­ent and a so-cal­led pre­mi­um on the ham­mer pri­ce from the buy­ers. In order to avo­id any accu­sa­ti­on of squan­de­ring, the pledge should be adver­ti­sed in an appro­pria­te form. The grea­ter the demand for the pled­ged item, the lower the flat fee.

Important to know: The deb­tor bears the cos­ts of the pro­cee­dings. Unrea­lizable cos­ts can be clai­med as expen­ses for tax pur­po­ses by the cre­di­tor.

The Auc­tion­eer shall have unli­mi­t­ed and per­so­nal lia­bi­li­ty for cul­pa­ble brea­ches of duty. The cli­ent can­not release the auc­tion­eer from this lia­bi­li­ty for dama­ges. The auc­tion­eer’s remu­ne­ra­ti­on is the­r­e­fo­re always also a lia­bi­li­ty remu­ne­ra­ti­on.

Spe­cial situa­ti­on insol­ven­cy

Brief ins­truc­tions on divi­si­on in the event of insol­ven­cy of a par­ty
(com­mu­ni­ty of heirs / frac­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty / com­pa­ny assets)

Prin­ci­ple: Share of the insol­vent par­ty

  • The share of the insol­vent joint mem­ber is included in the insol­ven­cy estate.
  • The insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor assu­mes the posi­ti­on of the deb­tor and exer­ci­s­es the debtor’s mem­ber­ship and sha­ring rights.
  • The admi­nis­tra­tor can the­r­e­fo­re demand the dissolution/division of the com­mu­ni­ty hims­elf (sett­le­ment or dis­so­lu­ti­on).

Con­se­quence: divi­si­on is dri­ven by insol­ven­cy

  • The insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor regu­lar­ly has a liqui­di­ty inte­rest: the share should be tur­ned into cash quick­ly.
  • A par­ti­ti­on auc­tion or rea­liza­ti­on by sale is the­r­e­fo­re often car­ri­ed out if no agree­ment can be rea­ched quick­ly.
  • Pro­ceeds are dis­tri­bu­ted accor­ding to quo­tas; inter­nal equa­liza­ti­on issues are to be cla­ri­fied out­side of uti­liza­ti­on.

Do’s for the non-insol­vent mem­bers

  • Imme­dia­te stra­tegy decis­i­on:
  • - Agree­ment on sale by pri­va­te trea­ty or public auc­tion with pro­fes­sio­nal opti­miza­ti­on of pro­ceeds, or
  • - Purchase/takeover of the insol­vent share from the estate.
  • Actively offer reve­nue opti­miza­ti­on: struc­tu­red, legal­ly com­pli­ant mar­ket pro­cess; public auc­tion as a neu­tral pri­cing mecha­nism.
  • Docu­ment quo­tas, ran­king and com­pen­sa­ti­on items in advan­ce (cos­ts, uti­liza­ti­on, invest­ments, with­dra­wals).
  • Agree in wri­ting with the admi­nis­tra­tor that the best pos­si­ble and spee­dy uti­liza­ti­on is sought; use data room/NDA for con­fi­den­ti­al infor­ma­ti­on.

Don’ts (typi­cal mista­kes)

  • Do not remain pas­si­ve: Wai­ting lea­ves the pace to the admi­nis­tra­tor and increa­ses the risk of a distress sale.
  • No infor­mal deals wit­hout mar­ket pri­cing; this crea­tes lia­bi­li­ty and con­se­quen­ti­al dis­pu­te risks.
  • No delay­ing tac­tics wit­hout a via­ble alter­na­ti­ve; the admi­nis­tra­tor can enforce judi­cial divi­si­on.

Spe­cial case: Insol­ven­cy of an entrepreneur/shareholder

  • The share under com­pa­ny law is also included in the estate.
  • The admi­nis­tra­tor may demand realization/division inso­far as con­trac­tual­ly and legal­ly pos­si­ble.
  • Com­pa­ny or con­trac­tu­al obli­ga­ti­ons (e.g. appr­oval requi­re­ments, trans­fer rest­ric­tions, suc­ces­si­on clau­ses) must be strict­ly obser­ved when rea­li­zing assets.
  • Prac­ti­cal focus: hig­hest pos­si­ble pro­ceeds with legal­ly com­pli­ant map­ping of ties.

Important for your Hna­deln

  • Insol­ven­cy of a par­ty = admi­nis­tra­tor takes over its right of par­ti­ti­on.
    - Struc­tu­ring the pro­cess at an ear­ly stage pre­vents distres­sed sales and maxi­mi­zes pro­ceeds.
    - Public auc­tion is the neu­tral instru­ment for divi­ding com­mu­ni­ties into money in a dis­pu­te-pro­of man­ner.

If the rea­liza­ti­on of col­la­te­ral
is time-cri­ti­cal and con­fi­den­ti­al:
Cont­act us.

Ele­ment #1