Dis­clai­mer of lia­bi­li­ty: We do not pro­vi­de legal or tax advice, only prac­ti­cal infor­ma­ti­on. The con­tent of this web­site is a pre­sen­ta­ti­on of our acti­vi­ties and not an adver­ti­se­ment.

Pledge of rights of for­war­ders, warehouse kee­pers, car­ri­ers and ship­pers

Freight for­war­ders, warehouse kee­pers, car­ri­ers and ship­pers are pri­vi­le­ged by the legis­la­tor in accordance with the HGB and BGB. The legis­la­tor grants them a pledge of rights and a right of rea­liza­ti­on in accordance with §§ 464, 475 b, 495, 440 of the Ger­man Com­mer­cial Code (HGB) to the items in their pos­ses­si­on from the deb­tor. The­se pled­ges of rights ari­se by ope­ra­ti­on of law.

The cre­di­tor is spared time-con­sum­ing and cost-inten­si­ve court dun­ning and legal pro­cee­dings as well as the cos­t­ly com­mis­sio­ning of a bai­liff for enforce­ment. Pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 191 (1) GVGA, the lat­ter can reject the rea­liza­ti­on wit­hout giving reasons, which is regu­lar­ly done in the case of cos­t­ly or com­plex mea­su­res. Unli­ke most cre­di­tors, the cre­di­tor the­r­e­fo­re bene­fits from a con­sidera­ble time and cost advan­ta­ge.

Choo­sing the right enforce­ment path is cri­ti­cal.

The sel­ec­ted enforce­ment rou­te has a mate­ri­al impact on reco­veries, cos­ts, and the timing of repay­ment, par­ti­cu­lar­ly whe­re freight for­war­ders have actu­al pos­ses­si­on of pled­ged goods.

Insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tors often urge cre­di­tors to hand over the inven­to­ry or let the estate con­trol the rea­liza­ti­on pro­cess, typi­cal­ly with assu­ran­ces of an effi­ci­ent and value-maxi­mi­zing out­co­me. The com­mer­cial rea­li­ty is dif­fe­rent: gross sale pro­ceeds are not the same as net cre­di­tor reco­veries. In a bulk dis­po­si­ti­on yiel­ding EUR 500,000 to EUR 1 million(from goods with an ori­gi­nal MSRP of EUR 2.5 mil­li­on), aggre­ga­te rea­liza­ti­on cos­ts can easi­ly absorb 12% to 26% of gross pro­ceeds, inclu­ding InsVV-based admi­nis­tra­tor fees (with uplifts), bro­ker cos­ts, sto­rage char­ges, and rela­ted out-of-pocket expen­ses. Timing is also mate­ri­al: clo­sing usual­ly requi­res two to five months, while actu­al remit­tance to the secu­red cre­di­tor often takes four to eight months or more, given the need for final cost sett­le­ment, veri­fi­ca­ti­on of sepa­ra­te satis­fac­tion rights, court aut­ho­riza­ti­on, and pos­si­ble dis­pu­tes over reten­ti­on-of-title inte­rests.

The same appli­es to rea­liza­ti­on spe­cia­lists and M&A advi­sors: struc­tu­red bid­ding pro­ces­ses or packa­ge sales are typi­cal­ly asso­cia­ted with sub­stan­ti­al fee arran­ge­ments and pro­lon­ged exe­cu­ti­on time­lines, while lia­bi­li­ty expo­sure and war­ran­ty claims remain in place.”

Bid pro­ces­ses are not “public auc­tions” as con­tem­pla­ted by the gover­ning sta­tu­to­ry frame­work. Whe­re a bid pro­cess is used to enforce pled­ged assets, the rea­liza­ti­on is legal­ly defec­ti­ve and non-com­pli­ant. Such enforce­ment is sus­cep­ti­ble to chall­enge by the deb­tor and, espe­ci­al­ly, by the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor. The con­se­quence may be civil lia­bi­li­ty in dama­ges for the secu­red cre­di­tor and, depen­ding on the facts and the man­ner of imple­men­ta­ti­on, poten­ti­al­ly cri­mi­nal lia­bi­li­ty as well.

Whe­re a bid pro­cess is used out­side the sta­tu­to­ry enforce­ment frame­work, the enti­re cost bur­den remains with the secu­red cre­di­tor. In par­ti­cu­lar, this includes the retai­ner fees typi­cal­ly incur­red during the pro­cess and any suc­cess fee­pa­ya­ble upon com­ple­ti­on. Such cos­ts are not reco­vera­ble out of the rea­liza­ti­on pro­ceeds and may not be off­set against amounts other­wi­se dis­tri­bu­ta­ble from the enforce­ment.

The posi­ti­on is mark­ed­ly dif­fe­rent in the case of a public auc­tion con­duc­ted by a publicly appoin­ted and sworn auc­tion­eer. As a rule, the pro­cess can be com­ple­ted within three to four weeks, requi­res only a mode­st publi­ca­ti­on char­ge and a tie­red decli­ning buyer’s pre­mi­um, and results in an irre­vo­ca­ble, court-defen­si­ble value deter­mi­na­ti­on. It also enables prompt dis­bur­se­ment of pro­ceeds, typi­cal­ly deli­vers stron­ger net reco­veries for the secu­red cre­di­tor, and acce­le­ra­tes the release of warehousing capa­ci­ty. Of par­ti­cu­lar signi­fi­can­ce are the con­tai­ned lia­bi­li­ty pro­fi­le, the effec­ti­ve exclu­si­on of war­ran­ties, and the fina­li­ty of the pro­cess, wit­hout sub­se­quent ren­ego­tia­ti­on. Whe­re the cre­di­tor is alre­a­dy in pos­ses­si­on of the pled­ged goods, that rou­te should not be sur­ren­de­red wit­hout com­pel­ling reason.

Why hesi­tant receiv­a­bles manage­ment can be expen­si­ve

Even befo­re insol­ven­cy, many busi­nesses refrain from taking decisi­ve enforce­ment action on over­due receivables—whether out of cau­ti­on, uncer­tain­ty, or the mista­ken expec­ta­ti­on of vol­un­t­a­ry pay­ment. What is often missed is that receiv­a­bles are not sta­tic assets: their eco­no­mic value ero­des day by day.

Late pay­ment is not just a mat­ter of oppor­tu­ni­ty cost; it is a direct thre­at to finan­cial sta­bi­li­ty. Capi­tal trap­ped in unpaid receiv­a­bles is unavailable for invest­ment, liqui­di­ty manage­ment, or the ser­vicing of the company’s own obli­ga­ti­ons. At the same time, the risk of non-coll­ec­tion increa­ses with every delay—through insol­ven­cy, asset dis­si­pa­ti­on, or simp­le pas­sa­ge of time.

Under Sec­tion 43(1) GmbHG, mana­ging direc­tors are under a duty to miti­ga­te loss. Anyo­ne who delays or fails to pur­sue rea­lizable receiv­a­bles is acting not only against sound com­mer­cial judgment, but also at the edge of per­so­nal lia­bi­li­ty. The law does not call for pati­ence; it calls for action. Enfor­cing available col­la­te­ral, exer­cis­ing pledge rights, and, whe­re neces­sa­ry, pro­cee­ding imme­dia­te­ly to public auc­tion are not mat­ters of dis­cre­ti­on, but of duty.

Respon­si­ble receiv­a­bles manage­ment means taking action befo­re value ero­des. Anyo­ne who loses months wai­ting for vol­un­t­a­ry pay­ment may ulti­m­ate­ly be forced to take sub­stan­ti­al write-downs—and to explain that inac­tion to share­hol­ders, cre­di­tors, or super­vi­so­ry bodies.

Alter­na­ti­ve: Auc­tion in accordance with § 825 ZPO

An auc­tion can also be held by a publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer ins­tead of a bai­liff for claims that have alre­a­dy been enforced.(Detail­ed infor­ma­ti­on > here.)

Advan­ta­ges:

  • Fas­ter imple­men­ta­ti­on: bai­liffs are very busy; auc­tion­eers are spe­cia­li­zed.
  • Bet­ter sales pro­ceeds: Auc­tion­eers have a broad net­work of buy­ers — both natio­nal­ly and inter­na­tio­nal­ly.
  • Effi­ci­en­cy for the cli­ent: fas­ter rea­liza­ti­on means hig­her pro­ceeds and a lower debt bur­den for the deb­tor.

Fur­ther infor­ma­ti­on on the ship­ping lien — ship­ping lien law — ship­ping lien auc­tion: > Blog post “Ship­ping lien law — so that the cri­sis does not beco­me a cata­stro­phe”.

Advan­ta­ges of col­la­te­ral enforce­ment:

We spe­cia­li­ze in the rea­liza­ti­on of receiv­a­bles for the trans­port and warehousing indus­try

Legal­ly com­pli­ant pro­ce­du­re

Invol­vement of a publicly appoin­ted and sworn auc­tion­eer requi­red by law — to pro­tect the debtor’s pro­per­ty inte­rests

Iden­ti­fi­ca­ti­on and sel­ec­tion

Com­mer­cial exper­ti­se in gene­ra­ting sui­ta­ble pro­s­pec­ti­ve buy­ers, natio­nal­ly and inter­na­tio­nal­ly, for hig­her auc­tion pro­ceeds

Pool of pro­s­pec­ti­ve buy­ers

Ongo­ing cont­act with inte­res­ted buy­ers from our cus­to­mer data­ba­se

Maxi­mum legal cer­tain­ty

Reduc­tion of lia­bi­li­ty due to sta­tu­to­ry pro­vi­si­ons in the case of rea­liza­ti­on by publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eers by way of public auc­tion.
For over fif­teen years, we have been com­mis­sio­ned by logi­stics com­pa­nies to hand­le all kinds of goods.

Many years of expe­ri­ence

Time and cost savings

The pledge of rights ari­ses by law under the Ger­man Com­mer­cial Code: no time-con­sum­ing and cost-inten­si­ve dun­ning and legal pro­cee­dings neces­sa­ry

Pledge of rights accor­ding to § 446 HGB For­war­ding lien

Accor­ding to § 446 HGB, the freight for­war­der has a legal pledge of rights to the goods, inclu­ding freight, com­mis­si­on, expen­ses and use. The pre­re­qui­si­te for this is that he is in pos­ses­si­on of the goods, in par­ti­cu­lar that he can dis­po­se of them by means of bills of lading, con­sign­ment bills or warehouse receipts. (Cf. Marx/Arens: Der Auk­tio­na­tor, 2004, p. 274)

Pledge of rights pur­su­ant to Sec­tion 475 b HGB Warehouse kee­per’s lien

Accor­ding to § 475 b HGB, the warehouse kee­per has a legal pledge of rights to the goods due to the sto­rage cos­ts. The pre­re­qui­si­te for this is that he is in pos­ses­si­on of the goods, in par­ti­cu­lar that he can dis­po­se of them by means of bills of lading, con­sign­ment bills or warehouse receipts (see Marx/Arens Der Auk­tio­na­tor, 2004, p. 274).

Pledge of rights accor­ding to § 440 HGB Car­ri­er’s lien

Accor­ding to § 440 HGB, the car­ri­er has a sta­tu­to­ry lien on the car­go for all claims ari­sing from the con­tract of car­ria­ge and cus­toms duties as well as accor­ding to §§ 26 and 27 BinSchG in con­junc­tion with § 440 HGB. § 440 HGB a sta­tu­to­ry pledge of rights. The pre­re­qui­si­te for this is that he is in pos­ses­si­on of the goods, in par­ti­cu­lar that he can dis­po­se of them by means of bills of lading, con­sign­ment bills or warehouse receipts (see Marx/Arens Der Auk­tio­na­tor, 2004, p. 274).

Ques­ti­ons about:

Cos­ts

Mana­geable cos­ts

We are obli­ged to car­ry out the valua­ti­on and rea­liza­ti­on at reasonable cos­ts, taking into account the rights of all par­ties invol­ved. The amount is based on the type of pledge and the effort requi­red to achie­ve ade­qua­te rea­liza­ti­on pro­ceeds in the inte­rests of the deb­tor. As remu­ne­ra­ti­on for his expen­ses and acti­vi­ties, the auc­tion­eer recei­ves a lump sum from the cli­ent and a so-cal­led pre­mi­um on the ham­mer pri­ce from the buy­ers. In order to avo­id any accu­sa­ti­on of squan­de­ring, the pledge should be adver­ti­sed in an appro­pria­te form. The grea­ter the demand for the pled­ged item, the lower the flat fee.

Important to know: The deb­tor bears the cos­ts of the pro­cee­dings. Unrea­lizable cos­ts can be clai­med as expen­ses for tax pur­po­ses by the cre­di­tor.

The Auc­tion­eer shall have unli­mi­t­ed and per­so­nal lia­bi­li­ty for cul­pa­ble brea­ches of duty. The cli­ent can­not release the auc­tion­eer from this lia­bi­li­ty for dama­ges. The auc­tion­eer’s remu­ne­ra­ti­on is the­r­e­fo­re always also a lia­bi­li­ty remu­ne­ra­ti­on.

Spe­cial situa­ti­on insol­ven­cy

Quick gui­de for freight for­war­ders
Rea­liza­ti­on of freight for­war­der’s lien in the event of insol­ven­cy

1) Imme­dia­te situa­ti­on (what appli­es if the cli­ent is insol­vent?)

  • Only com­mu­ni­ca­te with the (pro­vi­sio­nal) insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor after fil­ing for insol­ven­cy.
  • Sepa­ra­te receiv­a­bles:
  • - Claims befo­re application/opening = insol­ven­cy claims → regis­ter in the table.
  • - Claims after ope­ning only if the admi­nis­tra­tor is new­ly appoin­ted = lia­bi­li­ties of the estate.
  • Time fac­tor: The ear­lier owner­ship is secu­red and rea­liza­ti­on initia­ted, the hig­her the proceeds/ratio.

2) For­war­der’s lien — ori­gin and core requi­re­ment

  • Ari­ses by ope­ra­ti­on of law on the goods han­ded over to you within the frame­work of forwarding/freight/warehousing rela­ti­onships.
  • No “asser­ti­on” neces­sa­ry for the crea­ti­on; pos­ses­si­on of the pro­per­ty is decisi­ve.
  • Pos­ses­si­on: Pledge of rights only exists as long as you are in direct pos­ses­si­on of the pro­per­ty.
  • Sur­ren­der = pledge of rights prac­ti­cal­ly lost (except in nar­row spe­cial cases).

3) Who may exploit? (Prio­ri­ty = direct pos­ses­si­on)

  • Prin­ci­ple: If the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­tor has direct pos­ses­si­on, he shall rea­li­ze the assets for the account of the per­son entit­led to sepa­ra­te satis­fac­tion in accordance with Sec­tion 166 (1) InsO.
  • If you have secu­red direct pos­ses­si­on in an insol­ven­cy-pro­of man­ner, you rea­li­ze the pro­per­ty yours­elf.
  • Prio­ri­ty prin­ci­ple: Whoe­ver has direct pos­ses­si­on in insol­ven­cy first con­trols the rea­liza­ti­on.

4) Sec­tion 88 InsO / “1‑month win­dow”

  • Insol­ven­cy-rela­ted col­la­te­ral is inef­fec­ti­ve.
  • If direct pos­ses­si­on with a pledge of rights is rea­li­zed in an insol­ven­cy-pro­of man­ner no later than 1 month befo­re the insol­ven­cy appli­ca­ti­on is filed, the admi­nis­tra­tor has no power of rea­liza­ti­on.
  • Prac­ti­cal: secu­re pos­ses­si­on in good time and exclude access by the deb­tor befo­re the (pro­vi­sio­nal) admi­nis­tra­tor takes pos­ses­si­on.

5) Type of uti­liza­ti­on — what is legal­ly com­pli­ant?

  • Stan­dard case: public auc­tion in accordance with §§ 1228 ff., 1235 BGB by a publicly appoin­ted, sworn auc­tion­eer.
  • Sale by pri­va­te trea­ty only in excep­tio­nal cases:
  • - if an objec­ti­ve stock exchange/market pri­ce exists (broker/authorized per­son), or
  • - if the­re is an expli­cit, effec­ti­ve agree­ment.
  • Lia­bi­li­ty pit­fall: Free­hand sale or “M&A auc­tion” wit­hout grounds for admis­si­bi­li­ty is unlawful and sub­ject to avoidance/liability.

6) Prac­ti­cal note (inte­rests of the insol­ven­cy admi­nis­tra­ti­on)

  • Admi­nis­tra­tor’s remu­ne­ra­ti­on depends on pro­ceeds from the insol­ven­cy estate → Incen­ti­ve to keep sepa­ra­te assets in the insol­ven­cy estate.
  • Expect resis­tance if you want to recy­cle yours­elf.
  • Anti­do­te: pre­sent fast, docu­men­ted bet­ter uti­liza­ti­on.

7) If the admi­nis­tra­tor liqui­da­tes — your rights

  • The admi­nis­tra­tor must inform you befo­re the sale (inten­ti­on to sell, rou­te, pri­ce).
  • 168 InsO: You can pro­vi­de evi­dence of a bet­ter uti­liza­ti­on opti­on within 1 week.
  • If the admi­nis­tra­tor does not use them, he must place you in the same eco­no­mic posi­ti­on as if he had used them.

8) Do’s — con­cre­te road­map for freight for­war­ders

  • Do not sur­ren­der as long as the cla­im is out­stan­ding and a pledge of rights appli­es.
  • Imme­dia­te­ly in wri­ting to the (pro­vi­sio­nal) admi­nis­tra­tor: noti­fy the right to sepa­ra­te satis­fac­tion, spe­ci­fy the pro­per­ty, quan­ti­fy the cla­im, set a short dead­line.
  • Crea­te inventory/condition docu­men­ta­ti­on (pho­tos, seri­al num­bers, papers, sto­rage loca­ti­on).
  • Man­da­te a publicly appoin­ted auc­tion­eer and sche­du­le the auc­tion.
  • In the event of time criticism/decline in value: sub­mit fire sale/auction pro­po­sal with reve­nue fore­cast imme­dia­te­ly.

9) Don’ts — typi­cal mista­kes

  • Publi­ca­ti­on “on demand”.
  • Sale on the open mar­ket wit­hout a mar­ket pri­ce or wit­hout an effec­ti­ve agree­ment.
  • Only ver­bal agree­ments.
  • Delay uti­liza­ti­on — pro­ceeds fall, are­as remain blo­cked.

10) How we typi­cal­ly work

  • Pledge rea­liza­ti­on app­rai­sal to deter­mi­ne the value and to argue for pro­ceeds on request.
  • Legal­ly com­pli­ant public auc­tion with a lar­ge net­work of buy­ers.
  • Short-term public auc­tion to enforce a bet­ter rea­liza­ti­on against the admi­nis­tra­tor.
  • Result: hig­her pro­ceeds, fas­ter pay­out, space quick­ly available.

Important for your actions

For­war­ding lien ari­ses auto­ma­ti­cal­ly with pos­ses­si­on. Whoe­ver holds the direct pos­ses­si­on insol­ven­cy-pro­of, rea­li­zes — regu­lar­ly publicly; by pri­va­te trea­ty only in excep­tio­nal cases.

If the rea­liza­ti­on of col­la­te­ral
is time-cri­ti­cal and con­fi­den­ti­al:
Cont­act us.